Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs

References

• Beattie VE , O’Connell NE , Moss BW. 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest Prod Sci. 65(1–2):71–79. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00179-7
   Google Scholar
• Beattie VE , Walker N , Sneddon IA. 1996. An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behaviour and production of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 48(3–4):151–158. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botermans JAM , Olsson AC , Andersson M , Bergsten C , Svendsen J. 2015. Performance, health and behaviour of organic growing-finishing pigs in two different housing systems with or without access to pasture. Acta Agr Scand a-An. 65(3–4):158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourmad JY , Hassouna M , Robin R , Guingand N , Meunier-Salaun MC , Lebret B. 2009. Influence of pig rearing system on animal performance and manure composition. Animal. 3(4):606–616. doi: 10.1017/S1751731108003601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkmann A , Hoy S. 2009. Frequency of occupation with different simultaneously offered devices by fattening pigs kept in pens with or without straw. Livest Sci. 124(1–3):330–334. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo YG , Lian XM , Yan PS. 2015. Diurnal rhythms, locations and behavioural sequences associated with eliminative behaviours in fattening pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 168:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MB , Studnitz M , Pedersen LJ. 2010. The effect of type of rooting material and space allowance on exploration and abnormal behaviour in growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 123(3–4):87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen P , Toates FM. 1993. Who needs behavioral needs - Motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 37(2):161–181. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90108-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison RS , Hemsworth PH , Cronin GM , Campbell RG. 2003. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 82(3):173–188. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00067-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison RS , Johnston LJ , Hilbrands AM. 2007. The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 103(1–2):12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell NE , Beattie VE. 1999. Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Anim Welfare. 8(3):269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh HK , Choi HB , Ju WS , Chung CS , Kim YY. 2010. Effects of space allocation on growth performance and immune system in weaning pigs. Livest Sci. 132(1–3):113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen AW , Simonsen HB , Dybkjaer L. 2002. Effect of access to roughage and shelter on selected behavioural indicators of welfare in pigs housed in a complex environment. Anim Welfare. 11(1):75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce GP , Paterson AM. 1993. The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behavior, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 36(1):11–28. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90095-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presto MH , Algers B , Persson E , Andersson HK. 2009. Different roughages to organic growing/finishing pigs - influence on activity behaviour and social interactions. Livest Sci. 123(1):55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott K , Chennells DJ , Campbell FM , Hunt B , Armstrong D , Taylor L , Gill BP , Edwards SA. 2006. The welfare of finishing pigs in two contrasting housing systems: fully-slatted versus straw-bedded accommodation. Livest Sci. 103(1–2):104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JI , Park KH , Jeon JH , Choi HL , Barroga AJ. 2013. Dynamics of air temperature, velocity and ammonia emissions in enclosed and conventional pig housing systems. Asian Austral J Anim. 26(3):433–442. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozawa A , Tanaka S , Sato S. 2016. The effects of components of grazing system on welfare of fattening pigs. Asian Austral J Anim. 29(3):428–435. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Weerd HA , Day JEL. 2009. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 116(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer HM , de Greef KH , Houwers HWJ. 2014. Space allowance and pen size affect welfare indicators and performance of growing pigs under comfort Class conditions. Livest Sci. 159:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar