Utilization of exogenous enzymes in beef cattle creep feeds

References

• Balci F, Dikmen S, Gencoglu H, Orman A, Turkmen II, Birick H. 2007. The effect of fibrolytic exogenous enzyme on fattening performance of steers. Bulg. J Vet Med. 10:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Colombatto D, Morgavi DP, Yang WZ. 2003. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. J Anim Sci. 81:E37–E47. doi:10.2527/2003.8114_suppl_2E37x doi: 10.2527/2003.8161628x
   Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Rode LM, Sewalt VJH. 1995. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages. Can J Anim Sci. 75:641–644. doi:10.4141/cjas95-096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter AJ, Binversie E, Ruiz-Moreno M, Stern MD. 2017. Effect of dried fermentation biomass on microbial fermentation in continuous culture and in vitro intestinal digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 230:47–58. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church DC. 1979. Growth and development of the ruminant stomach. digestive physiology and nutrition of ruminants. Volume 1: digestive Physiology, 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Oxford Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Getachew G, Blümmel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 72:261–281. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo LA, Tejido ML, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD. 2008. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on in vitro ruminal fermentation of substrates with different forage: concentrate ratios. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 141:306–325. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He ZX, He ML, Walker ND, McAllister TA, Yang WZ. 2014. Using a fibrolytic enzyme in barley-based diets containing wheat dried distillers grains with solubles: ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and growth performance of feedlot steers. J Anim Sci. 92:3978–3987. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-7707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholif AE, Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, Barbabosa A, Márquez O, Odongo NE. 2017. The effects of three total mixed rations with different concentrate to maize silage ratios and different levels of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris on in vitro total gas, methane and carbon dioxide production. J Agric Sci. 155:494–507. doi:10.1017/S0021859616000812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenco JM, DiLorenzo N, Stelzleni AM, Segers JR, Stewart Jr RL. 2016. Use of by-product feeds to decrease feed cost while maintaining performance of developing beef bulls. Prof. Anim Sci. 32:287–294. doi:10.15232/pas.2015-01436.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço JM, Froetschel MA, Segers JR, Tucker JJ, Stewart Jr RL. 2017. Utilization of canola and sunflower meals as replacements for soybean meal in a corn silage-based stocker system. Transl Anim Sci. 1:592–598. doi:10.2527/tas2017.0068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister TA, Oosting SJ, Popp JD, Mir Z, Yanke LJ, Hristov AN, Treacher RJ, Cheng KJ. 1999. Effect of exogenous enzymes on digestibility of barley silage and growth performance of feedlot cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 79:353–360. doi:10.4141/A98-099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall EI. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem J. 43:99–109. doi: 10.1042/bj0430099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meale SJ, Beauchemin KA, Hristov AN, Chaves AV, McAllister TA. 2014. Board-Invited Review: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve ruminant production. J Anim Sci. 92:427–442. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriel P, Arthington JD. 2013. Effects of trace mineral-fortified, limit-fed preweaning supplements on performance of pre- and postweaned beef calves. J Anim Sci. 91:1371–1380. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Washington, DC: Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Washington, DC: Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard DL, Hargrove DD, Olson TA, Marshall TT. 1989. Effects of creep feeding, zeranol implants and breed type on beef production: I. calf and cow performance. J Anim Sci. 67:609–616. doi:10.2527/jas1989.673609x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez J, Posada O, Noguera R. 2015. Effects of Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) age and different forage: concentrate ratios on methanogenesis. Rev MVZ Cordoba. 20:4726–4738. doi: 10.21897/rmvz.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers JR, Stelzleni AM, Pringle TD, Froetschel MA, Ross CL, Stewart Jr RL. 2013. Use of corn gluten feed and dried distillers grains plus solubles as a replacement for soybean meal and corn for supplementation in a corn silage-based stocker system. J Anim Sci. 91:950–956. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr SL, Faulkner DB, Buskirk DD, Ireland FA, Parrett DF, Berger LL. 1994. The value of creep feeding during the last 84, 56, or 28 days prior to weaning on growth performance of nursing calves grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue. J Anim Sci. 72:1084–1094. doi:10.2527/1994.7251084x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viñoles C, Jaurena M, De Barbieri I, Do Carmo M, Montossi F. 2013. Effect of creep feeding and stocking rate on the productivity of beef cattle grazing grasslands. N Z J Agr Res. 56:279–287. doi:10.1080/00288233.2013.840320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Abecia L, Newbold CJ. 2015. Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review. Front Microbiol. 6:1133. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar