Estimation of gas production and post-ruminal crude protein from native or ensiled Pisum sativum and Vicia faba grains

References

• Abreu JMF, Bruno-Soares AM. 1998. Chemical composition, organic matter digestibility and gas production of nine legume grains. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 70:49–57. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00071-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blümmel M, Aiple KP, Steingass H, Becker K. 1999. A note on the stoichiometrical relationship of short chain fatty acid production and gas formation in vitro in feedstuffs of widely differing quality. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 81:157–167. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0396.1999.813205.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò S, Tudisco R, Balestrieri A, Piccolo G, Infascelli F, Cutrignelli MI. 2009. Fermentation characteristics of different grain legumes cultivars with the in vitro gas production technique. Ital J Anim Sci. 8:280–282. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani M, Tagliapietra F, Maccarana L, Hansen HH, Bailoni L, Schiavon S. 2014. Technical note: in vitro total gas and methane production measurements from closed or vented rumen batch culture systems. J Dairy Sci. 97:1736–1741. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone JW, van Gelder AH, Bachmann H. 2002. Influence of inoculum source on gas production profiles. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 99:221–231. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00073-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone JW, van Gelder AH, Visscher GJW, Oudshoorn L. 1996. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 61:113–128. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(96)00950-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornou C, Drejer Storm IML, Hindrichsen IK, Worgan H, Bakewell E, Yáñez Ruiz DR, Abecia L, Tagliapietra F, Cattani M, Ritz C, Hansen HH. 2013. A ring test of a wireless in vitro gas production system. Anim Prod Sci. 53:585–592. doi: 10.1071/AN12091
   Google Scholar
• Davies ZS, Mason D, Brooks AE, Griffith GW, Merry RJ, Theodorou MK. 2000. An automated system for measuring gas production from forages inoculated with rumen fluid and its use in determining the effect of enzymes on grass silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 83:205–221. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckardt K, Khol-Parisini A, Zebeli Q. 2013. Peculiarities of enhancing resistant starch in ruminants using chemical methods: opportunities and challenges. Nutrients. 5:1970–1988. doi: 10.3390/nu5061970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds B, Südekum KH, Schwarz FJ, Schuster M, Spiekers H. 2010. Evaluating the protein value of forages using a modified gas test. In: Crovetto GM, editor. Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition. EAAP publication no. 127. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 719–720.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds B, Südekum KH, Spiekers H, Schuster M, Schwarz FJ. 2012. Estimating utilisable crude protein at the duodenum, a precursor to metabolisable crude protein for ruminants, from forages using a modified gas test. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 175:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, Lopez S, Bannink A. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br J Nutr. 83:143–150. doi: 10.1017/S0007114500000180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefrom A, Ott EM, Hoedtke S, Zeyner A. 2013. Effect of ensiling moist field bean (Vicia faba), pea (Pisum sativum) and lupine (Lupinus spp.) grains on the contents of alkaloids, oligosaccharides and tannins. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 97:1152–1160. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GfE. 2009. New equations for predicting metabolisable energy of compound feeds for cattle. 63rd Conference of the Society of Nutrition Physiology. Göttingen. p. 143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gierus M, Schiborra A, Südekum KH, Rave G, Taube F. 2008. Comparison of gas accumulation profiles of several feeds using manual or automated gas production methods. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 147:310–325. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedtke S, Zeyner A. 2011. Comparative evaluation of laboratory-scale silages using standard glass jar silages or vacuum-packed model silages. J Sci Food Agr. 91:841–849. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig H. 1990. Evaluation of aerobic stability. EUROBAC Conference, Uppsala. p. 72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kand D, Bagus Raharjo I, Castro-Montoya J, Dickhoefer U. 2018. The effects of rumen nitrogen balance on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis vary with dietary carbohydrate and nitrogen sources. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 241:184–197. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson L, Hetta M, Udén P, Martinsson K. 2009. New methodology for estimating rumen protein degradation using the in vitro gas production technique. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 153:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keim JP, Alvarado-Gilis C, Arias RA, Gandarillas M, Cabanilla J. 2017. Evaluation of sources of variation on in vitro fermentation kinetics of feedstuffs in a gas production system. Anim Sci J. 88:1547–1555. doi: 10.1111/asj.12825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorasani GR, Okine EK, Corbett RR, Kennelly JJ. 2001. Nutritive value of peas for lactating dairy cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 81:541–551. doi: 10.4141/A01-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnitzsch C, Hofmann T, Bachmann M, Martens SD, Henle T, Zeyner A, Steinhöfel O. 2019. Effect of ensiling and toasting of field pea grains on formation of Maillard polymers from lysine and arginine. Adv Anim Biosci. 10:540.
   Google Scholar
• Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 57:347–358. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoero F, Pulimeno AM, Rossi F. 2005. Effect of extrusion, expansion and toasting on the nutritional value of peas, faba beans and lupins. Ital J Anim Sci. 4:177–189. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2005.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauricio RM, Mould FL, Dhanoa MS, Owen E, Channa KS, Theodorou MK. 1999. A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 79:321–330. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00033-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agr Sci. 93:217–222. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 28:7–55.
   Google Scholar
• Raab L, Cafantaris B, Jilg T, Menke KH. 1983. Rumen protein degradation and biosynthesis 1. A new method for determination of protein degradation in rumen fluid in vitro. Br J Nutr. 50:569–582. doi: 10.1079/BJN19830128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingass H, Nibbe D, Südekum KH, Lebzien P, Spiekers H. 2001. Schätzung des nXP-Gehaltes mit Hilfe des modifizierten Hohenheimer Futterwerttests und dessen Anwendung zur Bewertung von Raps- und Sojaextraktionsschroten. VDLUFA-Kongress, Berlin, p. 114.
   Google Scholar
• Tagliapietra F, Cattani M, Bailoni L, Schiavon S. 2010. In vitro rumen fermentation: effect of headspace pressure on the gas production kinetics of corn meal and meadow hay. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 158:197–201. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufarelli V, Khan RU, Laudadio V. 2012. Evaluating the suitability of field beans as a substitute for soybean meal in early-lactating dairy cow: production and metabolic responses. Anim Sci J. 83:136–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00934.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaga M, Hetta M, Huhtanen P. 2017. Effects of heat treatment on protein feeds evaluated in vitro by the method of estimating utilisable crude protein at the duodenum. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 101:1259–1272. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder AH, Hetta M, Rodrigues MAM, De Boever JL, Den Hartigh H, Rymer C, van Oostrum M, van Kaathoven R, Cone JW. 2005. Ranking of in vitro fermentability of 20 feedstuffs with an automated gas production technique: results of a ring test. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 123-124:243–253. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Laar H, van Straalen WM, van Gelder AH, De Boever JL, D'heer B, Vedder H, Kroes R, de Bot P, van Hees J, Cone JW. 2006. Repeatability and reproducibility of an automated gas production technique. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 127:133–150. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Váradyová Z, Baran M, Zeleňák I. 2005. Comparison of two in vitro fermentation gas production methods using both rumen fluid and faecal inoculum from sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 123-124:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VDLUFA. 2012. Methodenbuch, Vol. 3, Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Darmstadt: VDLUFA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yu P, Goelema JO, Leury BJ, Tamminga S, Egan AR. 2002. An analysis of the nutritive value of heat processed legume seeds for animal production using the DVE/OEB model: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 99:141–176. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00114-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar