Influence of Enterococcus faecium with and without xylanase to corn and soybean meal-based diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, and faecal microflora in growing pigs

References

• Agboola AF, Odu O, Omidiwura BRO, Iyayi EA. 2015. Effect of probiotic, carbohydrase enzyme and their combination on the performance, histomorphology and gut microbiota in broilers fed wheat-based diets. Am J Exp Agric. 8:307–319.
   Google Scholar
• AOA. 2002. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 17th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC).
   Google Scholar
• Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Muzquiz JL. 2006. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol. 114:173–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera M, Cervantes M, Sauer WC, Araiza AB, Torrentera N. 2004. Ileal amino acid digestibility and performance of growing pigs fed wheat-based diets supplemented with xylanase. J Anim Sci. 82:1997–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford MR. 2000. Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition – their current value and future benefits. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 86:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Černauskienė J, Bartkevičiūtė Z, Hammerer J, Kozłowski K, H J. 2011. The effect of “bonvital”, a probiotic product containing Enterococcus faecium on the fattening performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of pigs under production conditions. Vet Ir Zootech. 54:20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Kwon OS, Min BJ, Son KS, Cho JH, Hong JW, Kim IH. 2005. The effects of dietary Biotite V supplementation as an alternative substance to antibiotics in growing pigs. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci 18:1642–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuka E. 2014. Comparative study of the effects of probiotic and commercial enzyme on growth rate, Haematology and serum Biochemistry of Broiler Chicken. J Food Process Technol. 5:5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Danicke S, Vahjen W, Simon O, Jeroch H. 1999. Effects of dietary fat type and xylanase supplementation to rye-based broiler diets on selected bacterial groups adhering to the intestinal epithelium. on transit time of feed, and on nutrient digestibility. Poult Sci. 78:1292–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dersjant-Li Y, Van De Belt K, Van Der Klis J, Dersjant-Li Y, Van De Belt K, Van Der Klis JD, Kettunen H, Rinttilä T, Awati A. 2015. Effect of multi-enzymes in combination with a direct-fed microbial on performance and welfare parameters in broilers under commercial production settings. J Appl Poult Res. 24:80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton T. W., Fenton M. 1979. An improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. Can J Anim Sci. 59:631–634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George M, Joseph L, George D. 2016. Role of prebiotic and probiotic in the management of chronic kidney disease patients. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 5:50–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübener K, Vahjen W, Simon O. 2002. Bacterial responses to different dietary cereal types and xylanase supplementation in the intestine of broiler chicken. Arch Anim Nutr. 56:167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazado CC, Caipang CMA, Kiron V. 2012. Enzymes from the gut bacteria of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua and their influence on intestinal enzyme activity. Aquac Nutr. 18:423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Shin NH, Ok JU, Jung HS, Chu GM, Kim JD, Kim IH, Lee SS. 2009. Effects of dietary synbiotics from anaerobic microflora on growth performance, noxious gas emission and fecal pathogenic bacteria population in weaning pigs. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 22:1202–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallo JJ, Rioperez J, Honrubia P. 2010. The addition of Enterococcus faecium to diet improves piglet’s intestinal microbiota and performance. Livest Sci. 133:176–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathlouthi N, Lalles JP, Lepercq P, Juste C, Larbier M. 2002. Xylanase and β-glucanase supplementation improve conjugated bile acid fraction in intestinal contents and increase villus size of small intestine wall in broiler chickens fed a rye-based diet. J Anim Sci. 80:2773–2779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain S, Allender MC, Schumacher J, Ramsay E. 2011. The effects of a probiotic on blood urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations in large felids. J Zoo Wildl Med. 42:426–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohana Devi S, Kim IH. 2014. Effect of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) supplementation on the growth performance, digestibility and blood profiles in weanling pigs. Vet Med. 59:527–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momtazan R, Moravej H, Zaghari M, Taheri HR. 2011. A note on the effects of a combination of an enzyme complex and probiotic in the diet on performance of broiler chickens. Irish J Agr Food Res. 50:249–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountzouris KC, Tsitrsikos P, Palamidi I, Arvaniti A, Mohnl M, Schatzmayr G, Fegeros K. 2010. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poult Sci. 89:58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugesan GR, Persia ME. 2013. Effects of exogenous enzymes and direct-fed microbials on performance, energy utilization, and body composition of broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 92(E-Suppl. 1):10.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen DH, Lee KY, Mohammadigheisar M, Kim IH. 2018. Evaluation of the blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids in matrix coating as antibiotic growth promoter alternative on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, excreta microflora, and carcass quality in broilers. Poult. Sci.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen DH, Lee KY, Tran HN, Upadhaya SD, Jeong YJ, Kim IH. 2017. Influence of Enterococcus faecium and endo-1, 4-β-xylanase supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, fecal gas emission, and meat quality in finishing pigs fed with diets based on corn–soybean meal. Can J Anim Sci. 98:126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist R. 2006. A preliminary clinical evaluation of Kibow Biotics®, a probiotic agent, on feline azotemia. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 24:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Park JW, Jeong JS, Lee SI, Kim IH. 2016. Effect of dietary supplementation with a probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) on production performance, excreta microflora, ammonia emission, and nutrient utilization in ISA brown laying hens. Poult Sci. 95:2829–2835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picchietti S, Fausto AM, Randelli E, Carnevali O, Taddei AR, Buonocore F, Scapigliati G, Abelli L. 2009. Early treatment with Lactobacillus delbrueckii strain induces an increase in intestinal T-cells and granulocytes and modulates immune-related genes of larval Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 26:368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Mustari A, Salauddin M, Rahman MM. 2014. Effects of probiotics and enzymes on growth performance and haematobiochemical parameters in broilers. J Bangladesh Agric Uni. 11:111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Romero LF, Indrakumar SE, Ravindran V. 2013. Influence of combinations of a direct-fed microbial and exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility in broilers at 11 and 21 days of age. Poult Sci. 92(E-Suppl. 1):88.
   Google Scholar
• Samli HE, Senkoylu N, Koc F, Kanter M, Agma A. 2007. Effects of Enterococcus faecium and dried whey on broiler performance, gut histomorphology and intestinal microbiota. Arch Anim Nutr. 61:42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 2004. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 9th ed. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Suzer C, Çoban D, Kamaci HO, Saka Ş, Firat K, Otgucuoğlu Ö, Küçüksari H. 2008. Lactobacillus spp. bacteria as probiotics in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L.) larvae: effects on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities. Aquaculture. 280:140–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahjen W, Gläser K, Schäfer K, Simon O. 1998. Influence of xylanase-supplemented feed on the development of selected bacterial groups in the intestinal tract of broiler chicks. J Agric Sci. 130:489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine NG, Leukes WD, Kaiser H. 2004. In vitro growth characteristics of five candidate aquaculture probiotics and two fish pathogens grown in fish intestinal mucus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 231:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt CL, Parr T, Bedford M. 2008. Mechanisms of action for supplemental NSP and phytase enzymes in poultry diets. In Carolina Poultry Nutrition Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Yan L, Kim IH. 2013. Effect of probiotics supplementation in diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, faecal microbial population and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. J App Anim Res. 41:23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZF, Kim IH. 2014. Effects of multistrain probiotics on growth performance, apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, cecal microbial shedding, and excreta odor contents in broilers. Poult Sci. 93:364–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZF, Kim IH. 2015. Effects of Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 supplementation in different energy and crude protein density diets on ileal amino acid digestibility and intestinal shedding of Lactobacilli and Escherichia coli in finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 201:115–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZF, Lee JM, Kim IH. 2014. Effects of Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 on weanling pigs were influenced by dietary energy and crude protein density. Livest Sci. 169:106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wang Y, Yao J, Li W. 2010. Inhibition ability of probiotic, Lactococcus lactis, against A. hydrophila and study of its immunostimulatory effect in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2:73–80.
   Google Scholar