Effects of protein supplements on fertility and assessment of the fertility genes (GDF9 and BMP15) in indigenous sheep of Bangladesh

References

• Aguirre Riofrio EL, Ferraz JBS, Mattos EC. 2016. Influence of non-genetic factors on growth and reproductive traits of sheep Santa Inês in extensive systems. Livestock Res Rural Dev. 28(7):Article #121 [accessed 2019 July 3]. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/7/agui28121.html.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş AH, Dursun Ş, Dŏgan Ş, Kiyma Z, Demirci U, Halıcı I. 2015. Effects of ewe live weight and age on reproductive performance, lamb growth, and survival in central anatolian merino sheep. Arch Anim Breed. 58:451–459. doi:10.5194/aab-58-451-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam MGS, Ul-Azam MS, Khan MJ. 2006. Supplementation with urea and molasses and body weight, milk yield and onset of ovarian cyclicity in cows. J Reprod Develop. 52:529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al- Haboby AH, Salmana T, Abdul Kareem A. 1999. Influence of protein supplemetation on reproductive traits of Awassi sheep grazing cereal stubble. Sm Rumin Res. 34:33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argüello-Hernández HJ, Cortez-Romero C, Rojas-Martínez RI, Segura-León OL, Herrera-Haro JG, Salazar-Ortiz J, Gallegos-Sanchez J. 2014. Origin, history and current situation of pelibuey sheep in Mexico. Trop Subtrop Agroecosys. 20:429–439.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee R. 2008. Conservation and in situ development of a prolific indigenous sheep in the Sundarban and Sagar Island [PhD thesis]. Koltata: University of Calcutta [accessed 2018 April 26]. http://www.caluniv.ac.in.
   Google Scholar
• Barzegari A, Atashpa S, Ghabili K, Nemati Z, Rustaei M, Azarbaijani R. 2010. Polymorphisms in GDF9 and BMP15 associated with fertility and ovulation rate in Moghani and Ghezel sheep in Iran. Reprod Domest Anim. 45:666–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan AKFH. 2014. Farm animal genetic resources in Bangladesh: diversity, conservation and management. Dhaka, Bangladesh: SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC) Press, p. 174.
   Google Scholar
• Bibinu BS, Yakubu A, Ugbo SB, Dim NI 2016. Computational molecular analysis of the sequences of BMP15 gene of ruminants and non-ruminants. Open J Genet. 6:39.
   Google Scholar
• Fukui Y, Kohno H, Okabe K, Katsuki S, Yoshizawa M, Togari T, Watanabe H. 2010. Factors affecting the fertility of ewes after intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed semen during the non-breeding season. J Reprod Dev. 56:460–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway SM, Mcnatty KP, Cambridge LM. 2000. Mutations in anoocyte-derive growth differentiation factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensetive manner. Nature Genet. 25:279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan JP, Gregan SM, Mulsant P, Mullen M, Davis GH, Powell R, Galloway SM. 2004. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries). Biol Reprod. 70:900–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan M, Talukder M. 2012. Comparative performance of different regional native sheep in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Veter. 28:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hess B, Lake S, Scholljegerdes E, Weston T, Nayigihugu V, Molle J, Moss G. 2005. Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction. J Anim Sci. 83:E90–E106.
   Google Scholar
• Javanmard A, Azadzadeh N, Esmailizadeh AK. 2011. Mutations in bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 genes are associated with increased litter size in fat-tailed sheep breeds. Vet Res Commun. 35:157–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir F, Sultana M, Shahjalal M, Khan M, Alam M. 2004. Effect of protein supplementation on growth performance in female goats and sheep under grazing condition. Pak J Biol Sci. 3:237–239.
   Google Scholar
• Legesse G. 2008. Productive and economic performance of small ruminants in two production systems of the highlands of Ethiopia. Cuvillier Verlag. 14:12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Maitra A, Sharma R, Ahlawat S, Borana K, Tantia M. 2016. Fecundity gene SNPs as informative markers for assessment of Indian goat genetic architecture. Indian J Anim Sci. 50:349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Nawaz A, Masroor K, Babar E, Nadeem A, Hussain T, Bilal F, Javed K, Muhammad K. 2013. Identification of molecular markers in bone morphogenetic protien15 (BMP15) gene of Balochi sheep. Pak J Zool. 45:1351–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonia J. 2008. Reproductive performance of Munjal sheep. Indian J Small Rumin. 14:121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman S, Begum IA, Alam MJ. 2014. Livestock in Bangladesh: distribution, growth, performance and potential. Livest Res Rural Devel. 26:233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Lozano JM. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza. 13:309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS, Users guide statistics. 2008. Institute, Inc. Cary, North Carolina. Sign, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principal and procedure of statistics- A biometrical approach. NewYork and London: Mc Graw-Hill, p. 39–177.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana N, Hassan N, Ershaduzzaman M, Talukder M, Iqbal A. 2011. Effect of intensive and semi-intensive feeding system on productive and reproductive performances of native sheep. J Sci Res. 3:693–698.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Våge DI, Husdal M, Kent MP, Klemetsdal G, Boman IA. 2013. A missense mutation in growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) is strongly associated with litter size in sheep. BMC Genomics. 14:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zohara BF, Azizunnesa A, Islam M, Alam M, Bari FY. 2014. Exfoliative vaginal cytology and serum progesterone during the estrous cycle of indigenous ewes in Bangladesh. J. Embryo Transf. 29:183–188.
   Google Scholar