Use of different methods for the evaluation of teat disinfectant products

References

• Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. 2016. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 6:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkema HW, Green MJ, Bradley J, Zadoks RN. 2009. Invited review: The role of contagious disease in udder health. Journal of Dairy Science. 92:4717–4729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumberger C, Guarin JF, Ruegg PL. 2016. Effect of 2 different premilking teat sanitation routines on reduction of bacterial counts on teat skin of cows on commercial dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 99:2915–2929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowey R, Edmondson P. 1996. Teat disinfection in dairy herds. In Practice. 18:254–260.
   Google Scholar
• Boddie RL, Nickerson SC. 1992. Evaluation of postmilking teat germicides containing lauricidin, saturated fatty acids, and lactic acid. Journal of Dairy Science. 75:1725–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddie RL, Nickerson SC, Adkinson RW. 2000. Efficacies of chlorine dioxide and iodophor teat dips during experimental challenge with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae. Journal of Dairy Science. 83:2975–2979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddie RL, Owens WE, Ray CH, Nickerson SC, Boddie NT. 2002. Germicidal activities of representatives of five different teat dip classes against three bovine mycoplasma species using a modified excised teat model. Journal of Dairy Science. 85:1909–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSi. 2009. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants and antiseptics used in the veterinary area. test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1) BS EN 1656:2009. London: BSi British Standards.
   Google Scholar
• EMA. 2019. Veterinary medicines: Regulatory information. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Enger BD, Fox LK, Gay JM, Johnson KA. 2015. Reduction of teat skin mastitis pathogen loads: diferences between strains, dips and contact times. Journal of Dairy Science. 98:1354–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick SR, Garvey M, Flynn J, Jordan K, Gleeson D. 2019b. Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others? Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 61:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick S, Garvey M, Flynn J, Jordan K, O’ Brien B, Gleeson D. 2019a. Screening commercial teat disinfectants against bacteria isolated from bovine milk using disk diffusion. Veterinary World. 12:629–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton DM, Peterson LG, Merrill WG. 1988. Evaluation of udder preparations on intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science. 71:1417–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton DM, Petersson LG, Merrill WG. 1986. Effects of premilking udder preparation practices on bacterial counts in milk and teats. Journal of Dairy Science. 69:260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey M, Curran D, Savage M. 2017. Efficacy testing of teat dip solutions used as disinfectants for the dairy industry: antimicrobial properties. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 70:179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson H, Sinclair LA, Brizuela CM, Worton HL, Protheroe RG. 2008. Effectiveness of selected premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercial Dairy farms. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 46:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson D, Flynn J, O’ Brien B. 2018. Effect of pre-milking teat disinfection on new mastitis infection rates of dairy cows. Irish Veterinary Journal. 71:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson D, O'Brien B, Flynn J, O'Callaghan E, Galli F. 2009. Effect of pre-milking teat preparation procedures on the microbial count on teats prior to cluster application. Irish Veterinary Journal. 62:461–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggag Y, Nossair M, Mansour A, Rahman A. 2018. Streptococci in dairy farms: isolation, antibiogram pattern and disinfectant sensitivity. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 59:85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hardefeldt LY, Marenda M, Crabb H, Stevenson MA, Gilkerson JR, Billman-Jacobe H, Browning GF. 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Australian veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Australian Veterinary Journal. 96:142–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan JS, Galton DM, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW. 1990. Protocols for evaluating efficacy of postmilking teat dips. Journal of Dairy Science. 73:2580–2585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane OM, Budd KE, Flynn J, McCoy F. 2013. Pathogen profile of clinical mastitis in Irish milk-recording herds reveals a complex aetiology. Veterinary Record. 17:173.
   Google Scholar
• Klostermann K, Crispie F, Flynn J, Meaney WJ, Paul Ross R, Hill C. 2009. Efficacy of a teat dip containing the bacteriocin lacticin 3147 to eliminate gram-positive pathogens associated with bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Research. 77:231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Benavides M, LeJune D, Mateus C, Faltynowski A, Hemling TC. 2012. In Vitro Efficacy of Non-Iodine Teat Disinfectants. In: Proceedings of 51st National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, St. Pete Beach, Florida, USA, pp. 195-196.
   Google Scholar
• MGS. 2020. Disinfectant Testing. Accessed 04 May 2021. https://www.mgslabs.co.uk/Disinfectant-Testing.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Mišeikienė R, Rudejevienė J, Gerulis G. 2015. Effect of pre-milking antiseptic treatment on the bacterial contamination of cow teats’ skin. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 18:159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson S, Saxon A, Fox L, Hemling T, Hogan J, Morelli J, Oliver S, Owens W, Pawlak M, Petersson L. 2004. Recommended protocols for evaluating efficacy of postmilking teat germicides. In: Proceedings of 43rd National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Charlotte, NC, page 379-399.NMC, 2017. Current Concepts of Bovine Mastitis. Minnesota, USA.
   Google Scholar
• NMC. 2017. Current Concepts of Bovine Mastitis (5th ed.). Minnesota, MN: National Mastitis Council.
   Google Scholar
• NMC. 2020. National Mastitis Council. Accessed 03 May 2021. https://www.nmconline.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Oura LY, Fox LK, Warf CC, Kemp GK. 2002. Efficacy of two acidified chlorite postmilking teat disinfectants with sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid on prevention of contagious mastitis using an experimental challenge protocol. Journal of Dairy Science. 85:252–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt AL, Oliver SP, Fydenkevez ME. 1984. Evaluation of experimental teat dip containing sodium chlorite and lactic acid by excised teat assay. Journal of Dairy Science. 67:3075–3080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukken YH, Rauch BJ, Morelli J. 2013. Defining standardized protocols for determining the efficacy of a postmilking teat disinfectant following experimental exposure of teats to mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science. 96:2694–2704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowron K, Sekowska A, Kaczmarek A, Grudlewska K, Budzynska A, Bialucha A, Gospodarek-Komkowska E. 2019. Comparison of the effectiveness of dipping agents on bacteria causing mastitis in cattle. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 26:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slimani K, Pirotais Y, Maris P, Abjean J-P, Hurtaud-Pessel D. 2018. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-dodecylpropane-1,3-diamine, a biocidal disinfectant, in dairy products. Food Chemistry. 262:168–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson J, Malcolm D. 2012. Smart approach to post-milking teat disinfection. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Milk Quality Conference. New Zealand Veterinary Association.
   Google Scholar