Modularity among horse mandibles: a study in the Araucan breed

References

• Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 2013. A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix. 24:7–14. doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone R. 1999. Anatomie comparée des mamifères domestiques. Tome 1. Vigot Fréres, 5ta. ed.
   Google Scholar
• Barone R. 2000. Anatomie comparée des mammifères domestiques. Tome 2. Arthrologie et myologie. Vigot.
   Google Scholar
• Bertossa RC. 2011. Morphology and behaviour: functional links in development and evolution. Phil Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sc. 366:2056–2068. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curth S, Fischer MS, Kupczik K. 2017. Patterns of integration in the canine skull: an inside view into the relationship of the skull modules of domestic dogs and wolves. Zoology. 125:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressino V, Lamas SG. 2010. Una perspectiva modular de la adaptación biológica. Ludus Vitalis. 18:13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami A, Polly PD. 2010. Methods for studying morphological integration and modularity. (J. Alroy, & G. Hunt, Edits.). Paleontol Soc Pap. 16:213–243. doi:10.1017/S1089332600001881.
   Google Scholar
• Heck L, Wilson LA, Evin A, Stange M, Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2018. Shape variation and modularity of skull and teeth in domesticated horses and wild equids. Frontiers Zool. 15:1–17. doi:10.1186/s12983-018-0258-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules and evolvability. In: En BK, editor. Variation. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP. 2009. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses. Evol Develop. 11:405–421. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00347.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP. 2011. Morphoj: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Res. 11:353–357. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP. 2014. Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis. Phil Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sc. 369:33–35. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. 2009. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol. 36:235–247. doi:10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizoguchi I, Toriya N, Nakao Y. 2013. Growth of the mandible and biological characteristics of the mandibular condylar cartilage. Jap Dental Sc Review. 49:139–150. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2013.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Parés-Casanova PM. 2014. Age-dependent mandibular asymmetries in domestic pigs. Research. 1:4–7. doi:10.13070/rs.en.1.797.
   Google Scholar
• Parés-Casanova PM, Cabello M. 2020. Patterns of mandibular asymmetries in two types of companion rabbits. J Vet Medic Series C: Anat Histol Embryol. 49:227–232. doi:10.1111/ahe.12517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Püschel T. 2014. Modularidad e Integración Morfológica en Cráneos Humanos: un Enfoque Morfométrico Geométrico. Int J Morphol. 32:299–304. doi:10.4067/S0717-95022014000100048.
   Google Scholar
• Richtsmeier JT, DeLeon VB, Lele SR. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Y Phys Anthropol. 45:63–91. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 2010. Digitalized landmarks and outlines (2.26). Stony Brook. Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 2015. The tps series of software. Hystrix. 26(1):9–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romaniuk A. 2018. Functional and phylogenetic aspect in modularity of Palearctic mustelids (Carnivora, Mustelidae) mandible. Vestnik Zool. 52:165–176. doi:10.2478/vzoo-2018-0018.
   Google Scholar
• Salamanca CA, Parés-Casanova PM, Crosby RA, Monroy N. 2017. Biometric analysis of Araucano Criollo horse. Arch. Zootec. 66:267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Salamanca CA, Parés-Casanova PM, Vélez TM, Bentez MJ. 2016. Uso de índices zoométricos en la diferenciación racial del caballo criollo de las sabanas inundables araucanas (Colombia). Actas Iberoam Conserv Anim. 7:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Salamanca-Carreño A, Jordana J, Crosby-Granados RA, Bentez-Molano J, Parés-Casanova PM. 2020. Lineal discrimination of horses and mules. A sympatric case from Arauca, Colombia. Animals (Basel). 10:1–6. doi:10.3390/ani10040679.
   Google Scholar
• Segura V, Cassini GH, Prevosti FJ, Andrade MF. 2020. Integration or modularity in the mandible of canids (Carnivora: Canidae): a geometric morphometric approach. J Mammal Evol. 28:145–157. doi:10.1007/s10914-020-09502-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thilander B. 1995. Basic mechanisms in craniofacial growth. Acta Odontol Scandin. 53:144–151. doi:10.3109/00016359509005964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro M, Manriquez SG, Suazo GI. 2010. Morfometría geométrica y el estudio de las formas biológicas: de la morfología descriptiva a la morfología cuantitativa geométrica. Int J Morphol. 28:977–990. doi:10.4067/S0717-95022010000400001.
   Google Scholar
• Veneziano A, Meloro C, Irish JD, Stringer C, Profico A, De Groote I. 2018. Neuromandibular integration in humans and chimpanzees: implications for dental and mandibular reduction in homo. Am J Phys Anthropol. 167:84–96. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, Bargo MS, Cassini GH, Toledo N, Vizca SF, Bargo S, Cassini GH, Toledo S. 2016. Forma y función en paleobiología de vertebrados, primera ed. EDULP.
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-778460-1.X5000-5.
   Google Scholar