Digestible and metabolizable energy prediction models in guinea pig feedstuffs

References

• AEC. Alimentation Equilibrée de Commentry (AEC). 1978. Animal feeding: energy, amino acids, vitamins, minerals. Paris: Doc. No.4. AEC, Commentry, France.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera JF. 2001. Aportaciones al conocimiento de la nutrición energética de pequeños rumiantes, con particular referencia al ganado caprino. Arch Zootec. 50(192):565–596.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn JS, Son GH, Kim MJ, Choi CS, Lee CW, Park JK, Kwon EG, Shin JS, Park BK. 2019. Effect of total digestible nutrients level of concentrates on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat composition of Korean Hanwoo steers. Food Sci Anim Resour. 39(3):388–401. doi:10.5851/kosfa.2019.e32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bakarat N, Laudadio V, Cazzato E, Tufarelli V. 2013. Potential contribution of retama raetam (forssk.) webb & berthel as a forage shrub in Sinai, Egypt. Arid Land Res Manag. 27:257–271. doi:10.1080/15324982.2012.756561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindelle J, Kinsama A, Picron P, Umba di M’Balu J, Kindele E, Buldgen A. 2009. Nutritive value of unconventional fibrous ingredients fed to guinea pigs in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Trop Anim Health Prod. 41(8):1731–1740. doi:10.1007/s11250-009-9372-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castrillo C, Hervera M, Baucells MD. 2009. Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods. R Bras Zootec. 38(1):1–14 (supl. especial). doi:10.1590/S1516-35982009001300001.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Bedriñana J, Chirinos-Peinado D. 2020. Digestibility, digestible and metabolizable energy of earthworm meal (Eisenia foetida) included in two levels in guinea pigs (Cavia Porcellus). Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst J. 5(3):171–177. doi:10.25046/aj050323.
   Google Scholar
• Castro J, Chirinos D. 2015. Impact of a comprehensive intervention on food security in poor families of Central Highlands of Peru. Food and Public Health. 5(6):213–219. doi:10.5923/j.fph.20150506.02.
   Google Scholar
• Castro J, Chirinos D, Calderón J. 2018. Nutritional quality of maca stubble (Lepidium peruvianum Chacón) in guinea pigs. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 29(2):410–418. doi:10.15381/rivep.v29i2.13405.
   Google Scholar
• Castro J, Chirinos D, Páucar C. 2017. Alkaline treatment (NaOH) effect in the dry matter and protein digestibility of california bulrush (Scirpus californicus) in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Rev Inv Vet Perú. 28(1):86–91. doi:10.15381/rivep.v28i1.11793.
   Google Scholar
• Chung KY, Chang SS, Lee EM, Kim HJ, Park BH, Kwon EG. 2015. Effects of high energy diet on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and blood constituents of final fattening Hanwoo steers. Korean J Agric Sci. 42(3):261–226. doi:10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.3.261.
   Google Scholar
• Clemente E, Arbaiza T, Carcelén F, Lucas O, Bazán V. 2003. Evaluación del valor nutricional de la Puya llatensis en la alimentación del cuy (Cavia porcellus). Rev Inv Vet Perú. 14(1):1–6. Available from: https://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rivep/v14n1/a01v14n1.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton E, Harris L. 1974. Nutrición animal aplicada, 2° edición. Zaragoza, España: Editorial Acribia, 756 pp.
   Google Scholar
• ENA. 2017. Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2017. Lima, Peru: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Available from: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1593/.
   Google Scholar
• Faber T, Hopkins A, Middelbos I, Price N, Fahey Jr G. 2011. Galactoglucomannan oligosaccharide supplementation affects nutrient digestibility, fermentation end-product production, and large bowel microbiota of the dog. J Anim Sci. 89(1):103–112. doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan YF, Yang YY, Yang P, Xia T, Ma YX. 2017. Available energy content, nutrients digestibility of chili meal and effects on performance of growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 229:97–105. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEEDNA. 2018. Composición de alimentos y valor nutritivo. Available from: https://www.fundacionfedna.org/tablas-fedna-composicion-alimentos-valor-nutritivo.
   Google Scholar
• Félix A, Gabeloni L, Brito C, Oliveira S, Silva A, Maiorka A. 2012. Effect of b-mannanase on the digestibility of diets with different proteín sources in dogs determined by different methodologies. J Anim Sci. 90(9):3060–3067. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galyean ML, Cole NA, Tedeschi LO, Branine ME. 2016. Board-invited review: efficiency of converting digestible energy to metabolizable energy and reevaluation of the California net energy system maintenance requirements and equations for predicting dietary net energy values for beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 94(4):1329–1341. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-0223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara P, Claeys T, Janssens GP. 2008. Apparent digestibility in meat-type guinea pigs as determined by total collection or by internal marker. Vet Med (Praha). 53(4):203–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MB, Eastridge ML. 2014. Carbohydrate and fat: considerations for energy and more. Prof Anim Scient. 30(2):140–149. doi:10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30101-7.
   Google Scholar
• Harahap RP, Jayanegara A, Fakhri N. 2018. Evaluation of oil palm fronds using fiber cracking technology combined with Indigofera sp. in ruminant ration by Rusitec. AIP Conf Proc. 2021:050008-1–050008-6. doi:10.1063/1.5062758.
   Google Scholar
• James G, Witten d, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning, with application in R. 1st ed. Springer Texts in Statistics. New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
   Google Scholar
• Jayanegara A, Ridla M, Nahrowi & Laconi EB. 2019. Estimation and validation of total digestible nutrient values of forage and concentrate feedstuffs. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng, 546, 042016. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/546/4/042016
   Google Scholar
• Kassa A. 2019. The different methods of measuring feed digestibility: a review. EC Nutrition. 14(1): 68–74. Available from: https://www.ecronicon.com/ecnu/pdf/ECNU-14-00542.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keys J, Van Soest P, Young E. 1970. Effect of increasing dietary cell wall content on the digestibility of hemicellulose and cellulose in swine and rats. J Anim Sci. 31(6):1172–1177. doi:10.2527/jas1970.3161172x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienzle E. 2002. Further developments in the prediction of metabolizable energy in pet food. J Nutr. 132(6):1796–1798. doi:10.1093/jn/132.6.1796S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laflamme DP. 2001. Determining metabolizable energy content in commercial pet foods. J Anim Physiol a Anim Nutr. 85(7–8):222–230. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0396.2001.00330.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers PJ, Carlson SL, Zdorkowski GA, Honeyman MS. 2009. Reducing food insecurity in developing countries through meat production: The potential of the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Renew Agric Food Syst. 24:155–162. doi:10.1017/S1742170509002543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JF, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG. 2010. Animal nutrition, 7th ed. Madrid, España: Prentice Hall-Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Meza G, Cabrera R, Morán J, Meza F, Cabrera C, Meza C, Meza J, Cabanilla M, López F, Pincay J, et al. 2014. Mejora de engorde de cuyes (Cavia porcellus L.) a base de gramíneas y forrajeras arbustivas tropicales en la zona de Quevedo, Ecuador. IDESIA (Chile). 32(3):75–80. doi:10.4067/S0718-34292014000300010.
   Google Scholar
• MIDAGRI. 2020. En el 2020 se elevarán las ventas y consumo de cuy. Lima, Peru: Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego – Perú. Available from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/midagri/noticias/76440-en-el-2020-se-elevaran-las-ventas-y-consumo-de-cuy.
   Google Scholar
• Moir KW, Yule WJ, Connor JK. 1980. Energy losses in the excreta of poultry: a model for predicting dietary metabolizable energy. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb. 20(103):151. doi:10.1071/ea9800151.
   Google Scholar
• NAS. 2019. Nutrient requirements of animals collection. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/collection/63/nutrient-requirements-of-animals.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 1995. Nutrient requirements of laboratory animals. 4th rev ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/4758.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle: seventh revised edition: update 2000. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2006. Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio-Carmona E, Giraldo-Carmona J, Narváez-Solarte W. 2012. Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina. Vet Zootec. 6(1):87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz MQ, Südekum KH, Clauss M, Jayanegara A. 2014. Voluntary feed intake and digestibility of four domestic ruminant species as influenced by dietary constituents: a metaanalysis. Livest Sci. 162:76–85. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostagno H, Texeira L, Donzele J, Gomez P, De Oliveira R, Lopes D, Ferreira A, Toledo S, Euclides R. 2011. Composición de alimentos y requerimientos nutricionales. Tercera Ediçao: Universidad Federal de Viçosa. 259 p. Available from: https://www.lisina.com.br/arquivos/Geral%20Espa%C3%B1ol.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schofield J, Noonan D, Chen Y, Penson P. 2014. Chapter 12 - Laboratory Animals Regulations and Recommendations for Global Collaborative Research: Australia and New Zealand. In: Javier Guillén, editor. Laboratory Animals. Academic Press; p. 333–376. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397856-1.00012-X.
   Google Scholar
• Shi CX, Liu ZY, Shi M, Li P, Zeng ZK, Liu L, Huang CF, Zhu ZP, Li DF. 2015. Prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy content of rice bran fed to growing pigs. Asian Australas. J Anim Sci. 28(5):654–661. doi:10.5713/ajas.140507.
   Google Scholar
• Sotelo A, Contreras C, Norabuena E, Castañeda R, van Heurck M, Bullón L. 2016. Digestibilidad y energía digestible de cinco leguminosas forrajeras tropicales. Rev Soc Quím Perú. 82(3):306–314.
   Google Scholar
• Spotorno AE, Marin JC, Manriquez G, Valladares JP, Rico E, Rivas C. 2006. Ancient and modern steps during the domestication of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus L.). J Zool. 270(1):57–62. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00117.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein HH, Sève B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CF. 2007. Invited review: amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. J Anim Sci. 85(1):172–180. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supo J. 2016. Soluciones de Análisis Predictivos Para la Investigación. Curso de especialización. Lima, Perú: SAPRE. Bioestadístico.
   Google Scholar
• Tshibangu I, Nsahlai V, Kiatoko H, Hornick JL. 2014. Nutritive value of Adenodolichos rhomboideus leaves compared with Leucaena leucocephala and Stylosanthes guianensis forages in indigenous goats in Lubumbashi (DR Congo). Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 18(2):165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 2008. Total digestible nutrients and protein per acre produced by five Indiangrass cultivars. Pasture & Hay Planting; CP 512. Available from: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_PLANTMATERIALS/publications/arpmctn 8012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2019. USDA Food Composition Databases. United States Department of Agriculture. Available from: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Amburgh ME, Collao-Saenz EA, Higgs RJ, Ross DA, Recktenwald EB, Raffrenato E, Chase LE, Overton TR, Mills JK, Foskolos A. 2015. The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system: updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. J Dairy Sci. 98(9):6361–6380. doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalobos L, Sánchez J. 2010. Evaluación agronómica y nutricional del pasto ryegrass perenne tetraploide (Lolium perenne) producido en lecherías de las zonas altas de Costa Rica. II. Valor nutricional. Agronomía Costarricense. 34(1):43–52. Available from: https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0377-94242010000100004.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss W, Conrad H, Pierre N. 1992. A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 39:95–110. doi:10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss W, Tebbe A. 2019. Estimating digestible energy values of feeds and diets and integrating those values into net energy systems. Trans Anim Sci. 3(3):953–961. doi:10.1093/tas/txy119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar