Sources of rumen enhancers including nitrate, chitosan extract and shrimp shell meal could modulate nutrient degradability and in vitro gas fermentation

References

• Anantasook N, Wanapat M. 2012. Influence or rain tree pod meal supplementation on rice straw based diets using in vitro gas fermentation technique. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 25(3):325–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analyses, 15th edn. Arlington, VA: Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem.
   Google Scholar
• Belanche A, Pinloche E, Preskett D, Newbold CJ. 2016. Effects and mode of action of chitosan and ivy fruit saponins on the microbiome, fermentation and methanogenesis in the rumen simulation technique. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 92:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchaar C, Greahead D. 2011. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 166-167:338–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabiles MS, Salah R, Lounici H, Drouiche N, Goosen MFA, Mameri N. 2012. Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocoll. 29:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blummel, M, Orskov, ER. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughage in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 40:109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Masse D. 2004. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84:319–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Bannink A, Odongo NE, McBride BW, France J. 2008. Aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle. J. Agric. Sci. 146:213–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galyen M. 1989. Laboratory procedures in animal nutrition research. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University.
   Google Scholar
• Goiri I, Garcia-Rodriguez A, Oregui LM. 2009. Effect of chitosans on in vitro rumen digestion and fermentation of maize silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 148:276–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon YI, Kamil JYVA, Shahidi F. 2002. Chitosan as an edible invisible film for quality preservation of herring and Atlantic cod. J. Agric. Food Chem. 20:5167–5178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joblin KN. 1999. Ruminal acetogens and their potential to lower ruminant methane emissions. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50:1307–1314.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2483–2492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang S, Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Norrapoke T, Foiklang S, Ampapon T, Phesatcha B. 2017. Using krabok (Irvingia malayana) seed oil and Flimingia macrophylla leaf meal as a rumen enhancer in an in vitro gas production system. Anim. Prod. Sci. 57:327–333.
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan SF, Pierce KM, Serra E, McDonald M, Rajauria G, Boland TM. 2021. Effect of chitosan inclusion and dietary crude protein level on nutrient intake and digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and N excretion in beef heifers offered a grass silage based diet. Animals (Basel). 11:171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leng RA. 2014. Interaction between microbial consortia in biofilm: a paradigm shift in rumen microbial ecology and enteric methane mitigation. Anim. Prod. Sci. 54:519–543.
   Google Scholar
• Makkar HPS, Blummel M, Becker K. 1995. In vitro effects and interaction between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. J. Sci. Food Agric. 69:481–493.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister TA, Newbold CJ. 2008. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootech. 49:231–253.
   Google Scholar
• Orskov ER, McDonal I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92:499–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paula EM, Broderick GA. 2020. Effects of replacing soybean meal with canola meal for lactating dairy cows fed 3 different ratios of alfalfa to corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 103(2):1463–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phesatcha K, Phesatcha B, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A. 2020. Roughage to concentrate ratio and Saccharomyces cerevisiae inclusion could modulate feed digestion and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Vet. Sci. 7(151):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel M, Sagathevan S, Thomas J, Mathen G. 1997. An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids in ruminal fluid. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 67:805–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sar C, Mwenya B, Pen B, Takaura K, Morikawa R, Tsujimoto A, Kuwaki K, Isogai N, Shinzato I, Asakura Y, et al. 2005. Effect of ruminal administration of Escherichia coli wild type or a genetically modified strain with enhanced high nitrite reductase activity on methane emission and nitrate toxicity in nitrate-infused sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 94:691–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2013. User's guide: statistic, version 6, 12th ed.. Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmock RL, Husby FH, Brundage AL. 1985. Application of Van Soest acid detergent fiber method for analysis of shellfish chitin. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1502–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi J, Young BA. 1991. Prophylactic effect of L-cysteine on nitrate-induced alterations in respiratory exchange and metabolic rate in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 35:105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18:104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Tong JJ, Zhang H, Wang J, Yun L, Mao SY, Xiong BH, Jiang LS. 2020. Effect of different molecular weight of chitosan on methane production and bacterial community structure in vitro. J. Integr. Agric. 19(6):1644–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanapat M, Kongmun P, Poungchompu O, Cherdthong A, Khejornsart P, Pilajun R, Kaenpakdee S. 2012. Effects of plants containing secondary compounds and plant oils on rumen fermentation and ecology. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod. 44:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanapat M, Pimpa O. 1999. Effect of ruminal NH3-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 12(6):904–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, He Z, Beauchemin KA, Tang S, Zhou C, Han X, Wang M, Kang J, Odongo NE, Tan Z. 2016. Evaluation of different yeast species for improving in vitro fermentation of cereal straws. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 29:230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanferari F, Vendramini THA, Rentas MF, Gardinal R, Calomeni GD, Mesquita LG, Takiya CS. 2018. Effects of chitosan and whole raw soybeans on ruminal fermentation and bacterial populations, and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 101:10939–10952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar