Short communication: egg size and quality of hens housed in three different group sizes

References

• Abrahamsson P, Tauson R. 1997. Effects of group size on performance, health and birds’ use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 14(4):254–260. doi:10.1080/09064709709362394.
   Google Scholar
• Castelló JA, Barragán JI, Borroeta AC, Calvet S. 2010. Producción de huevos. Real Escuela de Avicultura. Barcelona. 575 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cepero R, Hernándiz A. 2015. Effects of housing systems for laying hens on egg quality and safety. 16th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products; Nantes, France.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts J, Wilson G. 2010. Optimum egg quality, 2nd ed. Sheffield: 5M Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elson HD, de Jong IC, Kjaer JB, Sossidou EN, Tauson R. 2012. Poultry welfare and management: WPSA working group nine. Worlds Poult Sci. 68(4):768–775. doi:10.1017/S0043933912000888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistic Division. Selected Indicator. [accessed 2021 Jun 22]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QCL.
   Google Scholar
• Gilani AM, Knowles TC, Nicol CJ. 2013. The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 148:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2013.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland H, Svihus B, Lervik S, Moe R. 2003. Effect of feed structure on performance and welfare in laying hens housed in conventional and furnished cages. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 53(2):92–100. doi:10.1080/09064700310002387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo A, Rossi M, Clerici F, Ratti S. 2008. A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems. Food Chem. 106(3):1031–1038. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt PS, Davies RH, Dewulf J, Gast RK, Huwe JK, Jones DR, Waltan D, William KR. 2011. The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poult Sci. 90(1):251–262. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huneau-Salaün A, Guinebretière M, Taktak A, Huonnic D, Michel V. 2011. Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality. Animal. 5(6):911–917. doi:10.1017/S1751731110002582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hy-Line Management Guide. 2021. [Internet], [accessed 2021 July 23]. https://www.hyline.com/filesimages/Hy-Line-Products/Hy-Line-Product-PDFs/Brown/BRN%20COM%20ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenna L, Pike P, Cooper J. 2016. Ranging behaviour of commercial free-range laying hens. Animals. 6(5):28. doi:10.3390/ani6050028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcher DM, Jones DR, Abdo Z, Zhao Y, Shepherd TA, Xin H. 2015. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters. Poult Sci. 94(3):485–501. doi:10.3382/ps/peu078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketta M, Tůmová E. 2016. Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review. Czech J Anim. Sci. 61(7):299–309. doi:10.17221/46/2015-CJAS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Chen D, Meng F, Su Y, Wang L, Zhang R, Li J, Bao J. 2017. Exterior egg quality as affected by enrichment resources layout in furnished laying-hen cages. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 30(10):1495–1499. doi:10.5713/ajas.16.0794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mench JA, van Tienhoven AV, Marsh JA, McCormick CC, Cunningham DL, Baker RC. 1986. Effects of cage and floor pen management on behavior, production, and physiological stress responses of laying hens. Poult Sci. 65(6):1058–1069. doi:10.3382/ps.0651058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Chen D, Li X, Li J, Bao J. 2015. Effects of large or small furnished cages on performance, welfare and egg quality of laying hens. Anim Prod Sci. 55:793–798. doi:10.1071/an13552.
   Google Scholar
• Nicodemus N, Callejo A, Blanco D, Buxadé C. 2012. Efecto de la densidad de gallinas por jaula y de la estirpe sobre la producción y la calidad del huevo. Memoria en: 5ª reunión AECACEM. Querétaro, Mexico. [accessed 2021 Jun 25]. http://oa.upm.es/21207/1/INVE_MEN_2012_128008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts J. 2004. Factors affecting egg internal quality and eggshell quality in laying hens. J Poult Sci. 41(3):161–177. doi:10.2141/jpsa.41.161.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenburg T, Koene P. 2007. The impact of group size on damaging, behaviours, aggression, fear end stress in farm animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 103:205–214. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck-Paim C, Negro-Calduch E, Alonso WJ. 2021. Laying hen mortality in different indoor housing systems: a meta-analysis of data from commercial farms in 16 countries. Sci Rep. 11:3052. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81868-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselt ED, van Bussel LGJ, van Horne P, van der Voet H, van der Heijden GW, van der Fels-Klerx HJ. 2015. Assessing the sustainability of egg production systems in the Netherlands. Poult Sci. 94(8):1742–1750. doi:10.3382/ps/pev165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vits A, Weitzenbürger D, Hamann H, Distl O. 2005. Production, Egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poult Sci. 84(10):1511–1519. doi:10.1093/ps/84.10.1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlčková J, Tůmová E, Ketta M, Englmaierová M, Chodová D. 2018. Effect of housing system and age of laying hens on eggshell quality, microbial contamination, and penetration of microorganisms into eggs. Czech J Anim Sci. 63(2):51–60. doi:10.17221/77/2017-CJAS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall H. 2011. Production performance and proportion of nest eggs in layer hybrids housed in different designs of furnished cages. Poult Sci. 90(10):2153–2161. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall H, Tauson R. 2002. Egg quality in furnished cages for laying hens—effects of crack reduction measures and hybrid. Poult Sci. 81(3):340–348. doi:10.1093/ps/81.3.340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardy W, Sae-Eaw A, Sriwattana S, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W. 2015. Assessing consumer emotional responses in the presence and absence of critical quality attributes: a case study with chicken eggs. J Food Sci. 80(7):S1574–S1582. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.12930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widowski T, Caston LJ, Hunniford ME, Cooley L, Torrey S. 2017. Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: performance and well-being. Poult Sci. 96(11):3805–3815. doi:10.3382/ps/pex197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar