Nutritional parameters and performance of crossbred heifers fed with millet and BRS 716 biomass sorghum silages

References

• Agricultural and food research council - AFRC. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. Wallingford: CAB International, 159 p.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida LGF, Parrella RAC, Simeone MLF, Ribeiro PCO, Santos AS, Costa ASV, Guimarães AG, Schaffert RE. 2019. Composition and growth of sorghum biomass genotypes for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy. 122:343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoac international (association of official analytical chemists international). 1990. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC international, 15th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• Assis RL, Freitas RS, Mason SC. 2018. Pearl millet production practices in Brazil: a review. Exp Agric. 54:699–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges LDA, Rocha Júnior VR, Monção FP, Soares C, Ruas JRM, Silva FV, Rigueira JPS, Costa NM, Oliveira LLS, Rabelo WO. 2019. Nutritional and productive parameters of Holstein/Zebu cows fed diets containing cactus pear. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 18:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Braga JMDS, Valadares RF, Pellizzoni SG, Valadares Filho SDC, Prates LL, Costa e Silva LF. 2012. Estimation of endogenous contribution and urinary excretion of purine derivatives from the total digestible nutrient intake in Nellore heifers. Rev Bras Zootec. 41:1899–1906.
   Google Scholar
• Burger PJ, Pereira JC, Queiroz AC, Silva JFC, Valadares Filho SC, Cecon PR, Casali ADP. 2000. Ingestive behavior in Dutch calves fed diets containing different concentrate levels. Rev Bras Zootec. 29:236–242.
   Google Scholar
• Calegari AG, Costa A, Lanillo RF, Casão Junior R, Santos DR. 2014. Conservation agriculture in Brazil. In: R. A. Jat, K. L. Sahrawat, A. H. Kassam, editor. In conservation agriculture: global prospects and challenges. Oxfordshire: CAB International; 54–88.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho GGP, Freitas PMD, Santos EM, Araújo GGL, Oliveira JS, Pires AJV, Maranhão CMA, Rodrigues TCGC, Freitas Júnior JE, Rufino LMA, et al. 2018. Effect of pearl millet silage ammoniated with urea on lamb production and metabolic performance. Grass Forage Sci. 1:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Casali AO, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SC, Pereira JC, Henriques LT, Freitas SG, Paulino MF. 2008. Influência do tempo de incubação e do tamanho de partículas sobre os teores de compostos indigestíveis em alimentos e fezes bovinas obtidos por procedimentos in situ. Rev Bras Zootec. 37:335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Castro FMR, Bruzi AT, Nunes JAR, Parrella RAC, Lombardi JMR, Albuquerque CJB, Lopes M. 2015. Agronomic and energetic potential of biomass sorghum genotypes. Am J Plant Sci. 06:1862–1873.
   Google Scholar
• Chen XB, Gomes MJ. 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle basedon urinary excretion of purine derivatives – an overview of technical details (Occasional Publication). Aberdeen: Rowett Research Institute, International Feed Resources Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Chizzotti ML, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Chizzotti FHM, Tedeschi LO. 2008. Determination of creatinine excretion and evaluation of spot urine sampling in Holstein cattle. Livest Sci. 113:218–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmann E, Souza MA, Valadares Filho SC, Queiroz AC, Berchielli TT, Saliba EOS, Cabral LS, Pina DS, Ladeira MM, Azevedo JAG. 2012. Methods for food analysis = Métodos para análise de alimentos. Suprema, Visconde do Rio Branco, MG, Brasil (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). ARS-USDA, Washington, DC. Agric. Handbook No. 379 [accessed 2020 Nov 5]. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/CAT87209099/PDF
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves GS, Pedreira MS, Pereira MLA, Santos DO, Souza DD, Porto Junior AF. 2014. Nitrogen metabolism and microbial production of dairy cows fed sugarcane and nitrogen compounds. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 15:48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics software Packaged for education and data analysis. Version 1.94b. Palaentologia Electronica, 4:1-9. Disponível em: < http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/>. Acesso em: 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman PC. 1997. Optimum body size of Holstein replacement heifers. J Anim Sci. 75:836–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Wichern WD. 2002. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. XX:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens DR, Loften JR. 1980. The effect of starch on forage fiber digestion kinetics in vitro. J Dairy Sci. 63:1437–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monção FP, Costa MAMS, Rigueira JPS,Moura MMA, Rocha VR, Gomes VM, Leal DB, Maranhão CMA, Albuquerque CJB, Chamone JMA. 2019. Yield and nutritional value of BRS Capiaçu grass at different regrowth ages. Semina Ciências Agrárias. 40:2045–2055. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5p2045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monção FP, Santana PF, Rocha Júnior VR, Ruas JRM, Rigueira JPS, Borges LDA, Menezes GCC, Sousa TES, Costa MD, Oliveira LLS, Queiroz FE. 2020. Nutritional efficiency of feed-restricted F1 Holstein/Zebu cows in early lactation. Trop Anim Health Prod. 52:141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. 1985. Applied linear statistical models. Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs, 2nd ed. Athens: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.1127 p.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th rev. ed. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ørskov ER, McDonald I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci. 92:499–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz FE, Rocha Júnior VR, Monção FP, Rigueira JPS, Parrella RAC, Rufino LDA, Santos AS, Cordeiro MWS. 2021. Effect of row spacing and maturity at harvest on the fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and nutritional characteristics of biomass sorghum (BRS 716) silage in the semiarid region of Brazil. Rev Bras Zootec. 50:e20200254.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos JCP, Rocha Júnior VR, Monção FP, da Costa Parrela RA, Caxito AM, Cordeiro MWS, da Hora FF, de Assis Pires DA. 2021. Effect of replacing forage sorghum silage with biomass sorghum silage in diets for F1 Holstein × Zebu lactating cows. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 53:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02503-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigueira JPS, Jesus NG, Rocha Júnior VR, Monção FP, Costa NM, David GSS, Silva FV, Carvalho CCS. 2021. Effects of different banana crop wastes on nutrient intake and digestibility, microbial protein synthesis, feeding behavior, and animal performance of ¾ Holstein × Zebu heifers in a semiarid rangeland. Trop Anim Health Prod. 53:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nded. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 476 p.
   Google Scholar
• Verbic J, Chen XB, Macleod NA. 1990. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steers. J Agric Sci. 114:243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldo DR, Smith LW, Cox LE. 1972. Model of cellulose disappearance from the rumen. J Dairy Sci. 55:125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss WP, Conrad HR, St. Pierre NR. 1992. A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 39:95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar