Morphological and genetic characterization of the Graciosa donkey breed

References

• Almeida LD. 2009. Diversidade genética de raças asininas criadas no Brasil, baseada na análise de locus microssatélites e DNA mitocondrial [Genetic diversity of donkey breeds raised in Brasil, based on microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analysis] [Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências Animais, Universidade de Brasília, Brasil. Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Ayad A, Aissanou S, Amis K, Latreche A, Iguer-Ouada M. 2019. Morphological characteristics of donkeys (Equus asinus) in Kabylie area. Algeria. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 52(2):53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Beretti V, Zanon A, Soffiantini CS, Sabbioni A. 2005. Preliminary results about morphological and demographic traits of Romagnolo donkey. Ann. Fac. Medic. Vet. di Parma. XXV:131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt ML. 1950. Ilha Graciosa [Graciosa Island]. Lisboa, Portugal. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Binns MM, Holmes NG, Holliman A, Scott AM. 1995. The identification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the horse and their use in thoroughbred parentage testing. Br. Vet. J. 151(1):9–15. doi:10.1016/s0007-1935(05)80057-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bordonaro S, Guastella AM, Criscione A, Zuccaro A, Marletta D. 2012. Genetic diversity and variability in endangered Pantesco and two other Sicilian donkey breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. Sci World J 2012:648427. doi:10.1100/2012/648427.
   Google Scholar
• Breen M, Lindgren G, Binns MM, Norman J, Irvin Z, Bell K, Sandberg K, Ellegren H. 1997. Genetical and physical assignments of equine microsatellites-first integration of anchored markers in horse genome mapping. Mamm Genome. 8(4):267–273. doi:10.1007/s003359900407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunevski G, Nikitovic J, Janzekovic M, Mergedush A, Prishenk J, Trajkovski B, Antić M. 2018. Defining breed standards and breeding goals for domestic donkey. Acta Agriculturae Serbica. XXIII(46):213–2211. doi:10.5937/AASer1846213B.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral GC, de Almeida FQ, Quirino CR, de Azevedo PCN, Batista Pinto LF, Santos EM. 2004. Morphometric evaluation of Mangalarga Marchador horse: conformation index and body proportions. R. Bras. Zootec. 33(6):1798–1805. doi:10.1590/S1516-35982004000700018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang W, Shang S, Zhang X, Yu Y, Irwin DM, Wang Z, Zhang S. 2019. A novel 13-plex STR typing system for individual identification and parentage testing of donkeys (Equus asinus). Equine Vet. J. 52(2):290–297. doi:10.1111/evj.13158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Rosa AR, Amato C, Zumbo A. 2007. Morphological traits of the Pantesco donkey. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6(1):646. doi:10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.646.
   Google Scholar
• Ellegren H, Johansson M, Sandberg K, Andersson L. 1992. Cloning of highly polymorphic microsatellites in the horse. Anim. Genet. 23:133–142. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.1992.tb00032.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira AB. 1987. A ilha da Graciosa [Graciosa Island]. Lisboa, Portugal: Livros Horizonte. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Folch P, Jordana J. 1997. Characterization, references ranges and the influence of gender on morphological parameters of the endangered Catalonian donkey breed. J Equine Vet Sci. 17(2):102–111. doi:10.1016/S0737-0806(97)80347-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca Jiménez Y, Cedeño Molina I, Pérez Pineda E, Rodríguez Valera Y, Martínez Aguilar Y, Cos Domínguez Y, Chacón Marcheco E. 2016. Caracterización zoométrica del asno Criollo Cubano (Equss asinus asinus), en la provincia Granma, Cuba [Zoometric characterization of the cuban creole donkey (Equss asinus asinus) of Granma province, Cuba]. REDVET. 17(3):1–11. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiev GZ. “Normality Test Calculator”, [online] Available at: https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/normality-test-calculator.php URL [Accessed Date: 22 Apr, 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Godard S, Vaiman D, Oustry A, Nocart M, Bertaud M, Guzylack S, Mériaux JC, Cribiu EP, Guérin G. 1997. Characterization, genetic and physical mapping analysis of 36 horse plasmid and cosmid-derived microsatellites. Mamm Genome. 8(10):745–750. doi:10.1007/s003359900558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guérin G, Bertaud M, Amiques Y. 1994. Characterization of seven new horse microsatellites: HMS1, HMS2, HMS3, HMS5, HMS6, HMS7 and HMS8. Anim Genet 25(1):62. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ISAG] International Society for Animal Genetics. 2017. Equine Genetics and Thoroughbred Parentage Testing Standardisation Workshop, Dublin, Ireland. pp 1–8. Available at: https://www.isag.us/Docs/EquineGenParentage2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana J, Folch P, Aranguren JA. 2011. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in the Catalonian donkey breed. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 118(1):57–63. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2001.00266.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kefena E, Beja-Pereira A, Han JL, Haile A, Mohammed YK, Dessie T. 2011. Eco-geographical structuring and morphological diversities in Ethiopian donkey populations. Livest Sci. 141:232–241. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaleel AG, Lawal LA, Nasir M, Hassan AM, Abdu MI, Salisu N, Kamarudin A-A. 2020. Morphometric characterization of donkeys (Equus asinus) in D/Kudu Kano State for selective breeding and genetic conservation. J Agrobiotechnol. 11(2):12–21. doi:10.37231/jab.2020.11.2.216.
   Google Scholar
• Komosa M, Purzyc H. 2009. Konik and Hucul horses: a comparative study of exterior measurements. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2245–2254. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugler W, Grunenfelder H-P, Broxham E. 2008. Donkey breeds in Europe: Inventory, description, need for action, conservation report 2007/2008. Monitoring Institute for Rare Breeds and Seeds in Europe in collaboration with SAVE foundation, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Liotta L, Arcudi D, Panetta C, Siclari A, D'Alessandro E. 2014. Computerized phenotypic characterization of the calabrese donkey population. Arch. Zootec. 63(243):551–554. doi:10.4321/S0004-05922014000300016.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes MS, Mendonça D, Rojer H, Cabral V, Bettencourt SX, da Câmara Machado A. 2015. Morphological and genetic characterization of an emerging Azorean horse breed: the Terceira Pony. Front Genet 6(62):1–7. doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00062.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacManus CM, Santos SA, da Silva JA, Louvandini H, Avreu UGP, Sereno JRB, Mariante AS. 2008. Body indices for the Pantaneiro horse. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 45(5):362–370. doi:10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2008.26677.
   Google Scholar
• Mariz TM de A, Escobdro PB, Dittrich JR, Neto MS, Lima CB, Ribeiro JdS. 2014. Padrão biométrico, medidas de atrelagem e índice de carga de equídeos de tração Urbana do município de Arapiraca, Alagoas [Biometric standard, wagon measures and load índex of urban cart equids of Arapiraca city, Alagoas]. Arch. Vet. Sci. 19(2):1–8. doi:10.5380/avs.v19i2.34085. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Marklund S, Ellegren H, Eriksson S, Sandberg K, Andersson L. 1994. Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 25(1):19–23. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00050.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshal TC, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton JM. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7(5):639–655. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin EG. 2006. Caracterización morfológica, hematológica y bioquímica clínica en cinco razas asnales españolas para programas de conservacion [Morphological, hematological and clinical biochemical characterization in five spanish donkey breeds for conservation programs] [PhD in Animal Production. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Rosset W. 1983. Particularités de la croissance et du développment du cheval [particularities of the growth and development of the horse]. Ann. Zootec. 32(1):109–130. French.
   Google Scholar
• Matassino D, Cecchi F, Ciani F, Incoronato C, Occidente M, Santoro L, Ciampolini R. 2014. Genetic diversity and variability in two Italian autochthonous donkey genetic types assessed by microsatellite markers. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 13(1):53–60. doi:10.4081/ijas.2014.3028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça MGV. 2005. Contributo para a Caracterização Biométrica e Molecular do Burro Anão da Graciosa [Contribution to the biometric and molecular characterisation of the Graciosa Dwarf Donkey]. Degree in Biotechnology, University of Azores. Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. 1988. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16(3):1215. doi:10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nengomasha EM, Pearson RA, Smith T. 1999. The donkey as a draught power resource in smallholder farming in semi-arid western Zimbabwe: 1. Live weight and food and water requirements. Anim. Sci. 69(2):297–304. doi:10.1017/S1357729800050864.
   Google Scholar
• Oom MM, da Costa Ferreira J. 1987. Estudo biométrico do cavalo alter [Biometric study of the Alter horse]. Rev. Port. Ciênc. Vet. 82:101–148. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012. Genalex 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 28:2537–2539. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RA, Ouassat M. 1996. Estimation of the liveweight and body condition of working donkeys in Morocco. Vet Rec. 138:229–233. doi:10.1136/vr.138.10.229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel MML, Pinheiro M, Maia Filho H, Sakamoto SM, Viana Nobre F, Valéria da Cunha Dias R. 2014. Parâmetros biométricos de asininos (Equus asinus) utilizados em provas de corrida no estado do Rio Grande do Norte [Biometric parameters of asinines (Equus asinus) used in evidence of race in the state of Rio Grande do Norte]. Acta Vet. Bras. 8(2):136–143. doi:10.21708/AVB.2014.8.2.3579. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Quaresma M, Nóvoa M, Monteiro A, Almeida JM, Portas M. 2005. A raça Asinina de Miranda [The donkey breed Asinina de Miranda]. Rev. Port. Cien. Vet. 100(555-556):227–231.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro B. 1989. O cavalo: raças, qualidades e defeitos [The horse: breeds, qualities and defects]. São Paulo: Editora Globo. Brasil. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Sargentini C, Tocci R, Giangiacomo L, Gianangeli B, Martini A, Gallai S, Giorgetti A. 2009. Morphological characteristics of Amiata donkey reared in Tuscany. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8(2):721–723. doi:10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.721.
   Google Scholar
• Stanisic LJ, Aleksic JM, Dimitrijevic V, Kovačevic B, Stevanovic J, Stanimirovic Z. 2020. Banat donkey, a neglected donkey breed from the central Balkans (Serbia). PeerJ. 8:e8598. doi:10.7717/peerj.8598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanisic LJ, Aleksic JM, Dimitrijevic V, Simeunovic P, Glavinic U, Jovanovic B, Stevanovic J, Stanimirovic Z. 2017a. Assessment of 17 microsatellite loci for their use in parentage verification and individual identification in the Balkan donkey breed. Genetika. 49(1):21–30. doi:10.2298/GENSR1701021S.
   Google Scholar
• Stanisic LJ, Aleksic JM, Dimitrijevic V, Simeunovic P, Glavinic U, Stevanovic J, Stanimirovic Z. 2017b. New insights into the origin and the genetic status of the Balkan donkey from Serbia. Anim. Gen. 48(5):1–11. doi:10.1111/age.12589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozaki T, Kakoi H, Mashima S, Hirota K, Hasegawa T, Ishida N, Miura N, Coi-Miura N, Tomita M. 2001. Population study and validation of paternity testing for thoroughbred horses by 15 microsatellite loci. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63(11):1191–1197. doi:10.1292/jvms.63.1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner HW, Sefc KM. 1999. IDENTITY 4.0. Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Xiangyu J, Zhang Y-p. 2006. DNA banking of animal genetic resources DNA banks— providing novel options. In: M. Carmen de Vicente, editor. Topical reviews in agricultural biodiversity. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute Chapter VIII: 56-60
   Google Scholar
• Yatkin S, Özdil F, Ünal EÖ, Genç S, Kaplan S, Gürcan EK, Arat S, Soysal MI. 2020. Genetic characterization of native donkey (Equus asinus) populations of Turkey using microsatellite markers. Animals (Basel). 10(6):1093. doi:10.3390/ani10061093.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng L, Dang R, Dong H, Li F, Chen H, Lei C. 2019. Genetic diversity and relationships of Chinese donkeys using microsatellite markers. Arch. Anim. Breed. 62:181–187. doi:10.5194/aab-62-181-2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RF, Xie WM, Zhang T, Lei CZ. 2016. High polymorphism at microsatellite loci in the Chinese donkey. Genet. Mol. Res. 15(2):gmr.15028291. doi:10.4238/gmr.15028291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar