303
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rapid Communication

Removal of sorghum stover from feed choices has no confounding effect on the quantity and quality of diets selected by group or individually fed sheep

, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 653-657 | Received 09 Apr 2020, Accepted 11 Sep 2023, Published online: 19 Oct 2023

References

  • Allen MS, Bradford BJ, Oba M. 2009. Board-invited review: the hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. J Anim Sci. 87:3317–3334. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-1779.
  • Alonso-Díaz MA, Torres-Acosta JFJ, Sandoval-Castro CA, Hoste H, Aguilar-Caballero AJ, Capetillo-Leal CM. 2009. Sheep preference for different tanniniferous tree fodders and its relationship with in vitro gas production and digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 151:75–85. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.12.002.
  • AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc.
  • Bach A, Villalba JJ, Ipharraguerre IR. 2012. Interactions between mild nutrient imbalance and taste preferences in young ruminants1,2. J Anim Sci. 90:1015–1025. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4176.
  • Basha NAD, Scogings PF, Dziba LE, Nsahlai IV. 2012. Diet selection of Nguni goats in relation to season, chemistry and physical properties of browse in sub-humid subtropical savanna. Small Ruminant Res. 102:163–171. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.08.002.
  • Baumont R, Prache S, Meuret M, Morand-Fehr P. 2000. How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review. Livest Prod Sci. 64:15–28. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00172-X.
  • Brunsvig BR, Smart AJ, Bailey EA, Wright CL, Grings EE, Brake DW. 2017. Effect of stocking density on performance, diet selection, total-tract digestion, and nitrogen balance among heifers grazing cool-season annual forages. J Anim Sci. 95:3513–3522. doi:10.2527/jas.2017.1563.
  • Castro M, Fernández-Núñez E. 2016. Seasonal grazing of goats and sheep on Mediterranean mountain rangelands of northeast Portugal. Livest Res Rural Dev. 28.
  • Chua B, Coenen E, Van Delen J, Weary D. 2002. Effects of pair versus individual housing on the behavior and performance of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 85:360–364. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74082-4.
  • Costes-Thire M, Laurent P, Ginane C, Villalba JJ. 2019. Diet selection and trade-offs between condensed tannins and nutrients in parasitized sheep. Vet Parasitol. 271:14–21. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.05.013.
  • Duncan AJ, SA Y. 2002. Can goats learn about foods through conditioned food aversions and preferences when multiple food options are simultaneously available? J Anim Sci. 80:2091–2098. doi:10.1093/ansci/80.8.2091.
  • Forbes JM, Kyriazakis I. 1995. Food preferences in farm animals: why don’t they always choose wisely? Proc Nutr Soc. 54(2):429–440. doi:10.1079/PNS19950012.
  • Ginane C, Baumont R, Lassalas J, Petit M. 2002. Feeding behaviour and intake of heifers fed on hays of various quality, offered alone or in a choice situation. Anim Res. 51:177–188. doi:10.1051/animres:2002016.
  • Meyer K, Hummel J, Clauss M. 2010. The relationship between forage cell wall content and voluntary food intake in mammalian herbivores. Mammal Rev. 40:221–245. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00161.x.
  • Mkhize NR, Scogings PF, Nsahlai IV, Dziba LE. 2014. Diet selection of goats depends on season: roles of plant physical and chemical traits. Afr J Range Forage Sci. 31(3):209–214. doi:10.2989/10220119.2014.901417.
  • Moore KJ, Jung HJG. 2001. Lignin and fiber digestion. J Range Manag. 54(4):420–430. doi:10.2307/4003113.
  • Mutimura M, Ebong C, Rao IM, Nsahlai IV. 2015. Nutritional values of available ruminant feed resources in smallholder dairy farms in Rwanda. Trop Anim Health Prod. 47(6):1131–1137. doi:10.1007/s11250-015-0839-y.
  • Ngwa A, Pone D, Mafeni J. 2000. Feed selection and dietary preferences of forage by small ruminants grazing natural pastures in the Sahelian zone of Cameroon. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 88:253–266. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00215-7.
  • Olson KC, Jaeger JR, Brethour JR, Avery TB. 2002. Steer nutritional response to intensive-early stocking on shortgrass rangeland. J Range Manag. 55:222–228. doi:10.2307/4003127.
  • Osoro K, Ferreira LMM, García U, Jáuregui BM, Martínez A, García RR, Celaya R. 2013. Diet selection and performance of sheep and goats grazing on different heathland vegetation types. Small Ruminant Res. 109(2-3):119–127. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.07.010.
  • Phillips C. 2004. The effects of forage provision and group size on the behavior of calves. J Dairy Sci. 87:1380–1388. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73287-7.
  • Provenza FD, Villalba JJ, Dziba L, Atwood SB, Banner RE. 2003. Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity. Small Ruminant Res. 49:257–274. doi:10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00143-3.
  • Pulina G, Avondo M, Molle G, Francesconi AHD, Atzori AS, Cannas A. 2013. Models for estimating feed intake in small ruminants. Rev Bras Zootec. 42(9):675–690. doi:10.1590/S1516-35982013000900010.
  • Redmon LA, McCollum III FT, Horn GW, Cravey MD, Gunter SA, Beck PA, Mieres JM, San Julian R. 1995. Forage intake by beef steers grazing winter wheat with varied herbage allowances. J Range Manag. 48:198–201. doi:10.2307/4002420.
  • Rook A, Penning P. 1991. Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 32:157–166. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80039-5.
  • Salem HB, Smith T. 2008. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Ruminant Res. 77:174–194. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.03.008.
  • Villalba JJ, Provenza F, Catanese F, Distel RA. 2015. Understanding and manipulating diet choice in grazing animals. Anim Prod Sci. 55:261–271. doi:10.1071/AN14449.
  • Villalba JJ, Provenza FD. 2009. Learning and dietary choice in herbivores. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 62(5):399–406. doi:10.2111/08-076.1.
  • Wang L, Wang D, Liu J, Huang Y, Hodgkinson KC. 2011. Diet selection variation of a large herbivore in a feeding experiment with increasing species numbers and different plant functional group combinations. Acta Oecol. 37(3):263–268. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2011.02.010.