Lysinibacillus fusiformis: a novel fibrolytic native strain from the rumen microbiome that increases in vitro digestibility of central agricultural residues

References

• Ander P, Messner K. 1998. Oxidation of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole by laccase and lignin peroxidase. Biotechnol Tech. 12:191–195. doi:10.1023/A:1008813206178.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola K, Kim S, Staples C, Adesogan A. 2011. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme application to low- and high-concentrate diets on the performance of lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 94:832–841. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban Y, Guan LL. 2021. Implication and challenges of direct-fed microbial supplementation to improve ruminant production and health. J Animal Sci Biotechnol. 12:109. doi:10.1186/s40104-021-00630-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant MP, Burkey A. 1953. Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. J Dairy Sci. 36:205–216. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(53)91482-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Harstad OM, McAllister T, Dörsch P, Holo H. 2020. Propionic acid bacteria enhance ruminal feed degradation and reduce methane production in vitro. Acta Agric Scandinavica section A. Anim Sci. 69:169–175. doi:10.1080/09064702.2020.1737215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, Martínez-Castañeda JS, Camacho LM, Kholif AEK, Vázquez-Chagoyán JC. 2015. Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization of low quality roughages in ruminants. J Integr Agric. 14:526–533. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60834-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun J-S, Beauchemin K, Schulze H. 2007. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to enhance in vitro fermentation of alfalfa hay and corn silage. J Dairy Sci. 90:1440–1451. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71629-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gado HM, Salem AZM, Robinson PH, Hassan M. 2009. Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 154:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill PR, Murray W, Wright MH. editors. 1997. Practical optimization. London: Academic Press; p. 136–137.
   Google Scholar
• Haque M. 2018. Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. J Anim Sci Technol. 60:1–10. doi:10.1186/s40781-018-0175-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W. 2015. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 5:14567. doi:10.1038/srep14567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabeur f, Mechri S, Kriaa M, Gharbi I, Bejaoui N, Sadok S, Joauadi B. 2020. Statistical experimental design optimization of microbial proteases production under co-culture conditions for chitin recovery from speckled shrimp Metapenaeus monoceros by-product. BioMed Res Int. 2020:1–10. doi:10.1155/2020/3707804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing D. 2010. Improving the simultaneous production of laccase and lignin peroxidase from Streptomyces lavendulae by medium optimization. Bioresour Technol. 101:7592–7597. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıc U, Gulecyuz E. 2017. Effects of some additives on in vitro true digestibility of wheat and soybean straw pellets. Open Life Sci. 12:206–213. doi:10.1515/biol-2017-0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM. 2014. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J Dairy Sci. 97:3231–3261. doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike S, Kobayashi Y. 2009. Fibrolytic rumen bacteria: Their ecology and functions. J Anim Sci. 22:131–138. doi:10.5713/ajas.2009.r.01.
   Google Scholar
• Kondratovich BL, Sarturi JO, Hoffmann CA, Ballou MA, Trojan ST, Campa PRB. 2019. Effects of dietary exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation characteristics of beef steers fed high- and low-quality growing diets. J Anim Sci. 97:3089–3102. doi:10.1093/jas/skz165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields GM, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. 2007. Clustal W and CLUSTAL X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 23:2947–2948. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh MS, Mohini M. 2014. Crop residues for sustainable livestock production. J Adv Dairy Res. 02:1000–e108. doi:10.4172/2329-888X.1000e108.
   Google Scholar
• Mechri S, Kriaa M, Berrouina MBE, Benmrad MO, Jaouadi NZ, Rekik H, Bouacem K, Bounanae-Darenfed A, Chebbi A, Sayadi S, et al. 2017. Optimized production and characterization of a detergent-stable protease from Lysinibacillus fusiformis C250R. Int J Macromol. 101:383–397. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza GD, Loera-Corral O, Plata-Pérez FX, Hernández-García PA, Ramírez-Mella M. 2014. Considerations on the use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve forage utilization. Review article. Sci World J. ID:247437. doi:10.1155/2014/247437.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi I, Wallace RJ, Moraïs S. 2021. The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 19:553–566. doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00543-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. 2005. Response surface methods and designs. In: Montgomery DC., editor. Design and analysis of experiments. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; p. 472–484.
   Google Scholar
• Morgavi DP, Kelly WJ, Janssen PH, Attwood GT. 2013. Rumen microbial (meta)genomics and its application to ruminant production. Animal. 7:184–201. doi:10.1017/S1751731112000419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete-Bolaños JL. 2012. Improving traditional fermented beverages: how to evolve from spontaneous to directed fermentation. Eng Life Sci. 12:410–418. doi:10.1002/elsc.201100128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete-Bolaños JL, Jiménez-Islas H, Botello-Álvarez E, Rico-Martínez R. 2003. Mixed culture optimization for marigold flower ensilage via experimental design and response surface methodology. J Agric Food Chem. 51:2206–2211. doi:10.1021/jf0257650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete-Bolaños JL, Serrato-Joya O. 2023. A novel strategy to construct multi-strain starter cultures: an insight to evolve from natural to directed fermentation. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 1:1–11. doi:10.1080/10826068.2023.2177870.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrete-Bolaños JL, Téllez-Martínez MG, Miranda-López R, Jiménez-Islas H. 2017. An experimental strategy validated to design cost-effective culture media based on response surface methodology. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 47:578–588. doi:10.1080/10826068.2017.1280825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omisore SO, Fabunmi TB, Ayodeji AO, Olaniyi OO, Arotupin DJ. 2022. Production and biochemical characterization of partially purified cellulase-free, thermo-acidophilic endoxylanase from Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain TB7 using kolanut husk as feedstock. Heliyon. 8:e11106. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly K, Attwood GT. 1998. Detection of Clostridium proteoclasticum and closely related strains in the rumen by competitive PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 64:907–913. doi:10.1128/AEM.64.3.907-913.1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. 1978. Proposed Hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J Anim Sci. 47:747–759. doi:10.2527/jas1978.473747x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61:539–542. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem AZM, Gado HM, Colombatto D, Elghandour MMY. 2013. Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and growth performance in beef steers. Livestock Sci. 154:69–73. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval-González L, Miranda-Romero LA, Lara-Bueno A, Huerta-Bravo M, Uribe-Gómez M, Martínez-Martínez M. 2016. In vitro fermentation and the correlation of the nutritional content of leucaena associated with star grass. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc. 7:3185–3196. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342016001203185&lng=es&nrm=iso.
   Google Scholar
• Seo JK, Kim SW, Kim MH, Upadhaya SD, Kam DK, Ha JK. 2010. Direct-fed microbials for ruminant animals. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 23:1657–1667. doi:10.5713/ajas.2010.r.08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabat SKB, Sasson G, Doron-Faigenboim A, Durman T, Yaacoby S, Berg-Miller ME, White BA, Shterzer N, Mizrahi I. 2016. Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. ISME J. 10:2958. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanier RY, Ingraham JL, Wheelis ML, Painter PR. 1986. The microbial world, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado-González DN, Miranda-Romero LA, Ruíz-Flores A, Medina-Cuéllar SE, Ramírez-Valverde R, Tirado-Estrada G. 2018. Meta-analysis: effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes in ruminant diets. J Appl Anim Res. 46:771–783. doi:10.1080/09712119.2017.1399135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Wine RH. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J Assoc Anal Chem. 50:50–55. doi:10.1093/jaoac/50.1.50.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhang G, Li Y, Zhang Y. 2020. Effects of high forage/concentrate diet on volatile fatty acid production and the microorganisms involved in VFA production in cow rumen. Animals (basel). 10:223–235. doi:10.3390/ani10020223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weimer PJ, Cox MS, Vieira de Paula T, Lin M, Hall MB, Suen G. 2017. Transient changes in milk production efficiency and bacterial community composition resulting from near-total exchange of ruminal contents between high- and low-efficiency Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 100:7165–7182. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanti Y, Yayota M. 2017. Agricultural by-products as feed for ruminants in tropical area: Nutritive value and mitigating methane emission. Reviews in Agric Sci. 5:65–76. doi:10.7831/ras.5.65.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoman CJ, Fields CJ, Lepercq P, Ruiz P, Forano E, White BA, Mosoni P. 2021. In vivo competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a gnotobiotic sheep model revealed by multi-omic analyses. ASM J (mBio). 12:e03533–20. doi:10.1128/mBio.03533-20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Chung J, Jiang Q, Sun R, Zhang J, Zhong Y, Ren N. 2017. Characteristics of rumen microorganisms involved in anaerobic degradation of cellulose at various pH values. RSC Adv. 7:40303–40310. doi:10.1039/C7RA06588D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar