Reexamining the issue of wild animals in disaster management

References

• Adom D. 2019. The place and voice of local people, culture, and traditions: a catalyst for ecotourism development in rural communities in Ghana. Scientific African. 6:e00184. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00184.
   Google Scholar
• Aguree S, Abah Abagale SA, Sackey I. 2023. Proximate composition and mineral profile of elephants forages in the Savannah ecological zone of Ghana. J Appl Anim Res. 51(1):573–580. doi:10.1080/09712119.2023.2250409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey R. 2019. Can animals sense natural disasters? [14 May 2019] https://www.thoughtco.com/can-animals-sense-natural-disasters-373256.
   Google Scholar
• Baird ME. 2010. The ‘phases’ of emergency management. https://www.memphis.edu/ifti/pdfs/cait_phases_of_emergency_mngt.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso P, Relimpio D, Zearra JA, Cerón JJ, Palencia P, Cardoso B, Ferreras E, Escobar M, Cáceres G, López-Olvera JR, Gortázar C. 2023. Using integrated wildlife monitoring to prevent future pandemics through one health approach. One Health. 16:100479. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson M. 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2:8–14. doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bogale GAB, Erena ZB. 2022. Drought vulnerability and impacts of climate change on livestock production and productivity in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. J Appl Anim Res. 50(1):471–489. doi:10.1080/09712119.2022.2103563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brando S, Norman M. 2023. Handling and training of wild animals: evidence and ethics-based approaches and best practices in the modern zoo. Animals (Basel). 13(14):2247. doi:10.3390/ani13142247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broad S. 2020. Wild trade, COVID-19, and zoonotic disease risks. https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/12764/covid-19-briefing-vfinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso B, García-Bocanegra I, Acevedo P, Cáceres G, Alves PC, Gortázar C. 2022. Stepping up from wildlife disease surveillance to integrated wildlife monitoring in Europe. Res Vet Sci. 144:149–156. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho GH, Ha K-M. 2019. Emergency awareness for animals: a Korean experience. J Appl Anim Res. 47(1):34–40. doi:10.1080/09712119.2018.1561370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin S, Kragh G. 2014. Wildlife tourism: reconnecting people with nature. Hum Dimen Wildlife. 19(6):545–554. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.921957.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis. SAGE Open. 4(1):215824401452263–10. doi:10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Farzanegan MR, Feizi M, Gholipour HF. 2021. Globalization and the outbreak of COVID-19: an empirical analysis. J Risk Fin Manag. 14(3):105. doi:10.3390/jrfm14030105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2021. Fundamentals of emergency management. https://emilms.fema.gov/is_0230e/curriculum/1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gaillard JC, van Niekerk D, Shoroma LB, Coetzee C, Amirapu T. 2019. Wildlife hazards and disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 33:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary F, Clauss M, Bonbon E, Myers L. 2021. Good emergency management practice: the essentials. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). doi:10.4060/cb3833en.
   Google Scholar
• Guney K, Kucuk O, Akturk E, Evcin O. 2017. Biodiversity of Gavurdag wildlife development area. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 51(3):S368–S372. doi:10.5530/ijper.51.3s.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilić T, Kulišić Z, Antić N, Radisavljević K, Dimitrijević S. 2017. Prevalence of zoonotic intestinal helminths in pet dogs and cats in the Belgrade area. J Appl Anim Res. 45(1):204–208. doi:10.1080/09712119.2016.1141779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries B. 2020. The loss of nature and the rise of pandemics. https://media.wwf.no/assets/attachments/the_loss_of_nature_and_rise_of_pandemics___protecting_human_and_planetary_health.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez A, Díaz MJ, Monroe MC, Benayas J. 2015. Analysis of the variety of education and outreach interventions in biodiversity conservation projects in Spain. Journal for Nature Conservation. 23:61–72. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johan SA, Bakar A, Shafawati Mohn Taib U, Khairat F, J E. 2022. House crows (Corvus splendens): the carrier of pathogenic viruses or the misunderstood bird? J Appl Anim Res. 50(1):678–686. doi:10.1080/09712119.2022.2133902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan NR, Smith BP, Appleby RG, van Eeden LM, Webster HS. 2020. Addressing inequality and intolerance in human–wildlife coexistence. Conserv Biol. 34(4):803–810. doi:10.1111/cobi.13471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargbo A, Jawo E, Amoutchi AI, Ndow M, Bojang A, Zainabou D, Jessica A. KF, Koua HK, Kuye R. 2023. Perceptions and impacts of climate variability on livestock farming in the Gambia. J Appl Anim Res. 51(1):366–374. doi:10.1080/09712119.2023.2203765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolinski L, Milich KM. 2021. Human-wildlife conflict mitigation impacts community perceptions around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Diversity (Basel). 13(4):145. doi:10.3390/d13040145.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L, Zhao H, Wu LB, Cheng Z, Liu C. 2023. Impact of the microbiome on human, animal, and environmental health from a One Health perspective. Science in One Health. 2:100037. doi:10.1016/j.soh.2023.100037.
   Google Scholar
• Margherita A, Elia G, Klein M. 2021. Managing the COVID-19 emergency: a coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 166:120656. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menghistu HT, Mersha TT, Abraha AZ. 2018. Farmers’ perception of drought and its socioeconomic impact: The case of Tigray and Afar regions of Ethiopia. J Appl Anim Res. 46(1):1023–1031. doi:10.1080/09712119.2018.1450752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monty F, Murti R, Furuta N. 2016. Helping nature and helping us: transforming disaster risk reduction through ecosystem management. https://www.iucn.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/helping-nature-help-us-transforming-disaster-risk-reduction-through-ecosystem-management.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Najib H. 1996. Effect of incorporating yeast culturesaccharomyces cerevisiaein to the Saudi Baladi and White Leghorn layer's diet. J Appl Anim Res. 10(2):181–186. doi:10.1080/09712119.1996.9706147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Council of Ministers. 2017. Ecosystem restoration for mitigation of natural disasters. https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1134363/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Recht J, Schuenemann VJ, Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2020. Host diversity and origin of zoonoses: the ancient and the new. Animals (Basel). 10(9):1672. doi:10.3390/ani10091672.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rusu AS, Criste AD, Dezmirean DS. 2021. Voices of NGOs supporting the first master’s degree program in ethology and human-animal interactions in Romania: an exploratory qualitative analysis. Animals (Basel). 11(4):1091. doi:10.3390/ani11041091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirakaya S. 2023. Chemical, nutritive, fermentative and microbial composition of almond hull silage. J Appl Anim Res. 51(1):17–23. doi:10.1080/09712119.2022.2148678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeman JM, Brand CJ, Wright SD. 2012. Strategies for wildlife disease surveillance. USGS Staff-Published Research. 971(37):539–551. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/971
   Google Scholar
• Spooner SL, Farnworth MJ, Ward SJ, Whitehouse-Tedd KM. 2021. Conservation education: are zoo animals effective ambassadors and is there any cost to their welfare? J Zoo Bot Gard. 2(1):41–65. doi:10.3390/jzbg2010004.
   Google Scholar
• Taiwo VO, Ogunsanmi AO. 2000. Erythrocyte membrane sialoglycoproteins. I. Qualitative and quantitative differences in zebu and taurine cattle and buffalo. J Appl Anim Res. 18(2):199–208. doi:10.1080/09712119.2000.9706344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M. 2019. Managing animals in disasters (MAID): improving preparedness, response, and resilience through individual and organisational collaboration. Melbourne, Australia: The Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre. https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/sites/default/files/managed/downloads/managing_animals_in_disasters_maid_-_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The International Fund for Animal Welfare. 2021. Beyond rescue: animals in disaster. https://d1jyxxz9imt9yb.cloudfront.net/resource/1341/attachment/original/IFAW_AnimalsinDisastersEurope_ENG_LR_DIGITAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thekaekara T, Bhagwat SA, Thornton TF. 2021. Coexistence and culture: understanding human diversity and tolerance in human-elephant interactions. Fron Conserv Sci. 2:735929. doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.735929.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasik B. 2015. The importance of wild-animal suffering. Relations. 3(3):133–152. doi:10.7358/rela-2015-002-toma.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2022. United Nations summit on biodiversity. https://news.un.org/en/search/%EF%BB%BFUnited%20Nations%20Summit%20on%20Biodiversity.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020. Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in the UN sustainable development cooperation framework. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/Integrating-DRR-CCA-in-CFs-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United States Geological Survey. 2023. Animals & earthquake prediction. https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/animals-earthquake-prediction.
   Google Scholar
• University of Oxford. 2017. Affluent counties contribute less to wildlife conservation than the rest of the world. [accessed 2017 May 4( https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170504131700.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehorn PR, Navarro LM, Schröter M, Fernandez M, Rotllan-Puig X, Marques A. 2019. Mainstreaming biodiversity: a review of national strategies. Biol Conserv. 235:157–163. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Animal Protection. 2023. Don’t forget them. https://www.worldanimalprotection.org/our-work/historical-achievements/animals-disasters.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2017. One health. http://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/one-health.
   Google Scholar
• World Wildlife Fund. 2022. Measuring the Importance of healthy rangelands to wildlife and people. https://www.worldwildlife.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J-M. 2023. Willingness to buy animal welfare products: a study on the conflict between moral attitudes and perceived higher prices. J Appl Anim Res. 51(1):447–455. doi:10.1080/09712119.2023.2225586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou XH, Wan XT, Jin YH, Zhang W. 2016. Concept of scientific wildlife conservation and its dissemination. Zool Res. 37(5):270–274. doi:10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2016.5.270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar