Feminist Methodology and Gender Planning Tools: Divergences and Meeting Points

References

• Bourdieu, Pierre. (1996) ‘Understanding,’ Theory, Culture and Society 13 (2): 17-37.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Robert. (1994) ‘Participatory Rural Appraisal: Challenges, Potentials and Paradigm,’ World Development 22 (10): 1437-54.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, Des. (1997) Logical Frameworks: A Critical Assessment. Managerial Theory. Pluralistic Practice, Institute of Social Studies, Working Paper Series No. 264, The Hague, ISS.
   Google Scholar
• Gianotten, Vera, Groverman, Verona, van Walsum, Edith and Zuidberg, Lida. (1996) ‘Assessing the Gender Impact of Development Projects,’ in Case Studies from Bolivia, Burkina Faso and India, KIT/ETC/Intermediate Technology, Amsterdam/Leusden/London, p. 103.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, Anne Marie. (1991) ‘Feminism and the Claim to Know: Contradictions in Feminist Approaches to Women and Development,’ in Grant, Rebecca and Newland, Kathleen (eds), Gender and International Relations, Indianapolis University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp. 133-58.
   Google Scholar
• Cuba, Egon G. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. (1987) ‘Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?’, in Sandra Harding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. (1992) ‘The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory,’ in Crowley, Helen and Himmelweit, Susan (eds), Knowing Women. Feminism and Knowledge, Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers and The Open University, Cambridge and Oxford, pp. 338-55.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, Nancy. (1999) The Feminist Standpoint Revisited, and Other Essays, Westview Press, Boulder/London.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, Mary E. (1989) `Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth,’ Signs 14 (3): 533-58.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, Emma. (1996) Gender Guidelines for Donor Funded Projects, The British Council Development and Training Services, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• INTRAC/South Research LFA/OOIP Workshop. (1994) ‘A Tool for Project Manag-ment and People-driven Development,’ in Proceedings of the INTRAC and South Research Workshop on LFA and OOIP, Leuven, Belgium, 16-18 May, p.35.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, Naila. (1994) Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought, Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• March, Candida. (1996) A Tool Kit: Concepts and Frameworks for Gender Analysis and Planning, Gender and Learning Team, Oxfam UK/Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, Mary. (1994) ‘Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research,’ in Maynard, Mary and Purvis, Jane (eds), Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 10-27.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland. (1994) Guidelines on Gender Analysis, Department for International Development Cooperation, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, Maxine. (1998) ‘Analyzing Women’s Movements,’ in Jackson, Cecile and Pearson, Ruth (eds), Feminist Visions of Development. Gender Analysis and Policy, Routledge, London, pp. 65-89.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Caroline. (1995) Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, David. (1994) ‘Authority, Gender and Knowledge: Theoretical Reflections on the Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal,’ Development and Change 25 (3): 497-527.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, Linda. (1990) ‘Introduction,’ in Nicholson, Linda (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London, pp. 1-19.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.M. (1990) ‘Introduction,’ in Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 1-41.
   Google Scholar
• Overholt, Catherine A., Cloud, Kathleen, Anderson, Mary B. and Austin, James E. (1985) Gender Roles in Development Projects: A Case Book, Kurnarian Press, West Hartford, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Parpart, Jane and Marchand, Marianne. (1995) ‘Exploding the Canon: An Introduction Conclusion,’ in Marchand, Marianne and Parpart, Jane L. (eds), Feminism. Postmodernism, Development, Routledge, London, pp. 1-23.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Ruth. (1992) ‘Gender Matters in Development,’ in Allen Tim, and Thomas. Alan (eds), Poverty and Development in the 1990s, Oxford University Press in Association with the Open University, Oxford, pp. 29l-313.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Ruth and Jackson, Cecile. (1998) ‘Introduction: Interrogating Development: Feminism, Gender and Policy,’ in Jackson, Cecile and Pearson, Ruth (eds), Feminist Visions of Development. Gender Analysis and Policy, Routledge, London, pp. 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, Shahra. (1997) ‘Fitting Gender into Development Institutions,’ World Development 25 (7): 1111-25.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (1999) Human Development Report, UNDP, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Suzanne. (1994) The Oxfam Gender Training Manual, Oxfam. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Diane L. (1996) ‘Situating Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork,’ in Wolf, Diane L. (ed.), Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 1-56.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Kate. (1993) Planning Development with Women. Making a World of Difference, Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar