Corporate board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia

References

• Aaijaz, N., & Ibrahim, M. (2012). CSR inflections: An overview on CSR global strategies adopted by companies in Malaysia and other Asian countries. The Journal of Southeast Asian Research, 12, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Presley, T. J. (2012). Female board presence and the likelihood of financial restatement. Accounting Horizons, 26, 607–629. doi:10.2308/acch-50249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah, S. N. (2014). The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 18, 1137–1159. doi:10.1007/s10997-013-9279-0
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah, S. N., Mohamad, N. R., & Mokhtar, M. Z. (2011). Board independence, ownership and CSR of Malaysian Large Firms. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8, 3417–3431.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. (2015). Board diversity: More than a gender issue. Deakin Law Review, 20, 123–152. doi:10.21153/dlr2015vol20no1art497
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaum, G., & Peterson, R. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes of future business leaders do they vary by gender and religiosity? Business & Society, 45, 300–321. doi:10.1177/0007650306289388
   Google Scholar
• Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 497–512. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1930-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amran, N. A. (2011). Corporate governance mechanisms and company performance: Evidence from Malaysian companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7, 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 141–156. doi:10.1002/bse.672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, B., Gul, F., Guthrie, J., & Teoh, H. Y. (1989). A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: The case of Malaysia and Singapore. The British Accounting Review, 21, 371–376. doi:10.1016/0890-8389(89)90034-6
   Google Scholar
• Bantel, K. A. (1993). Top team, environment, and performance effects on strategic planning formality. Group & Organization Management, 18, 436–458. doi:10.1177/1059601193184004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2011). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 15, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, M., O’connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (2013). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 419–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 120–136. doi:10.1002/bse.506
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, N. M., Solomon, J., Uddin, S., & Choudhury, J. (2008). Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: Illustrations from a less-developed country. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 1026–1051.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholtz, A. K., & Carroll, A. B. (2012), Business & society: Ethics & stakeholder management, South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 59–73. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciocirlan, C., & Pettersson, C. (2012). Does workforce diversity matter in the fight against climate change? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 47–62. doi:10.1002/csr.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., Dixon, R., & Michael, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A longitudinal study of listed banking companies in Bangladesh. World Review of Business Research, 5, 130–154.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37, 1636–1663. doi:10.1177/0149206311411506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, D., & Velte, P. (2016). The impact of supervisory board composition on CSR reporting. Evidence from the German two-tier system. Sustainability, 8, 63. doi:10.3390/su8010063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djajadikerta, H. G., & Trireksani, T. (2012). Corporate social and environmental disclosure by Indonesian listed companies on their corporate web sites. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13, 21–36. doi:10.1108/09675421211231899
   Google Scholar
• Esa, E., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian government-linked companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12, 292–305. doi:10.1108/14720701211234564
   Google Scholar
• Fauzi, F., & Locke, S. (2012). Board structure, ownership structure and Firm performance: A study of New Zealand listed-firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8, 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez‐Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz‐Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21, 351–364. doi:10.1002/csr.1329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5, 233–262. doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56, 393–416. doi:10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28, 327–356. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00376
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. P., Lam, K. C., Sami, H., & Zhou, H. (2014). board diversity and its effect on firm financial and non-financial performance. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2531212
   Google Scholar
• Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9, 77–108. doi:10.1108/09513579610109987
   Google Scholar
• Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 463–479. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haji, A. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility disclosures over time: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28, 647–676. doi:10.1108/MAJ-07-2012-0729
   Google Scholar
• Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 641–660. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnah, H., Sofri, Y., Sharon, M., & Ishak, I. (2006). Level of corporate social disclosure in Malaysia. Malaysian Accounting Review, 5, 159–184.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, L. C. J., & Taylor, M. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom‐line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18, 123–150.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2009). Determinants of board members' financial expertise—Empirical evidence from France. The International Journal of Accounting, 44, 378–402. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2009.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 601–615. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 399–415. doi:10.1002/smj.230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, H.-U.-Z. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 52, 82–109. doi:10.1108/17542431011029406
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 207–223. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1336-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliç, M., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting in the Turkish banking industry Corporate Governance, 15(3), 357–374. doi:10.1108/CG-02-2014-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, A. (2010). Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business, 45, 367–374. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards, Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larmou, S., & Vafeas, N. (2010). The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 14, 61–85. doi:10.1007/s10997-009-9091-z
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. (2014). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 712–722. doi:10.1002/smj.2127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2016). CFO gender and earnings management: Evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 46, 881–905. doi:10.1007/s11156-014-0490-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2014). Stakeholders' power, corporate characteristics, and social and environmental disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 426–436. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance. (2007). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cg_code_malaysia_2007_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance. (2012). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2012. Retrieved fromhttp://www.mia.org.my/new/downloads/circularsandresources/circulars/2012/21/MCCG_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MCG Index. (2011). MSWG Survey. Retrieved from http://www.mswg.org.my/files/editor_files/file/CEO/MCG-Index-2011-CEO-Powerpoint-Presentation-of-Findings-07-Dec-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed Adnan, S. (2012). Culture and corporate social responsbility (CSR) reporting: Evidence from China, India, Malaysia and United Kingdom (PhD thesis). University of Auckland, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7, 251–266. doi:10.1108/14720700710756535
   Google Scholar
• MWFCD. (2014). Quick Facts MWFCD. Retrieved from http://www.kpwkm.gov.my/documents/10156/671634/QUICK_FACTS_KPWKM_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Naser, K., Al-Hussaini, A., Al-Kwari, D., & Nuseibeh, R. (2006). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: The case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting, 19, 1–23. doi:10.1016/S0897-3660(06)19001-7
   Google Scholar
• Ng, L. W. (1985). Social responsibility disclosures of selected New Zealand companies for 1981, 1982 and 1983. Palmerston North, NZ: Faculty of Business, Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors' contribution to board decision‐making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7, 16–29. doi:10.1057/emr.2009.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Black economic empowerment disclosures by South African listed corporations: The influence of ownership and board characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 121–138. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1446-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman, R., & Ameer, R. (2010). Environmental disclosures of palm oil plantation companies in Malaysia: A tool for stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Ansah, S. (1998). The impact of corporate attribites on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting, 33, 605–631. doi:10.1016/S0020-7063(98)90015-2
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218–228. doi:10.2307/2393956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978), The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50, 189–223. doi:10.1177/0007650310394642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12, 143–163.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. (2013). CEO duality and agency cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Management & Governance, 17, 989–1008. doi:10.1007/s10997-012-9213-x
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. (2014). Revisiting agency theory: Evidence of board independence and agency cost from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 181–198. Vol.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A., & Lodh, S.C. (2008). The influence of ownership structures and board practices on corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 211–237. doi:10.1016/S1479-3563(08)08008-0
   Google Scholar
• Said, R., Hj Zainuddin, Y., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5, 212–226. doi:10.1108/17471110910964496
   Google Scholar
• Said, R., Omar, N., & Nailah Abdullah, W. (2013). Empirical investigations on boards, business characteristics, human capital and environmental reporting. Social Responsibility Journal, 9, 534–553. doi:10.1108/SRJ-02-2012-0019
   Google Scholar
• Sartawi, I. I. M., Hindawi, R. M., Bsoul, R., & Ali, A. E. J. (2014). Board composition, firm characteristics, and voluntary disclosure: The case of jordanian firms listed on the amman stock exchange. International Business Research, 7, 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, W. E., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The US versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 265–284. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9110-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukeri, S. N., Shin, O. W., & Shaari, M. S. (2012). Does board of director's characteristics affect firm performance? Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. International Business Research, 5, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Sundarasen, S. D., Je-Yen, T., & Rajangam, N. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16, 35–53. doi:10.1108/CG-05-2015-0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Korn Ferry Institute (2011). The 2010 Asian Diversity Survey. Retrieved from http://www.kornferry.com
   Google Scholar
• Ujunwa, A., Okoyeuzu, C., & Nwakoby, I. (2012). Corporate board diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Revista De Management Comparat International, 13, 605–620.
   Google Scholar
• Wan Abd Rahman, N. H., Mohamed Zain, M., & Yaakop Yahaya Al-Haj, N. H. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: Evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7, 181–201. doi:10.1108/17471111111141486
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. Accounting Review, 65, 131–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48, 817–838. doi:10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, W. F. W. (2010). Characteristics of boards of directors and board effectiveness: A study of Malaysian public listed companies. PhD thesis. Victoria University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, W. F. W., & Amrstrong, A. (2012). What competencies should directors possess? Malaysia perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 7, 142–150.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2012). Board demographic diversity, independence, and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12, 686–700. doi:10.1108/14720701211275604
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H.-B. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 381–392. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1352-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar