Empowerment in their hands: use of WhatsApp by women in Nigeria

References

• Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach. Journal of Human Development, 6, 115–133. doi:10.1080/146498805200034275
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, A., & Urquhart, C. (2012). Unveiling the modernity bias: A critical examination of the politics of ICT4D. Information Technology for Development, 18, 281–292. doi:10.1080/02681102.2011.643204
   Google Scholar
• Badran, M. F. (2015). Empowering female-owned SMEs with ICT in a group of selected Arab countries and Brazil. In International Conference on Internet Science (pp. 30–48). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18609-2_3
   Google Scholar
• Bailur, S., & Masiero, S. (2017). Women’s income generation through mobile Internet: A study of focus group data from Ghana, Kenya, and Uganda. Gender, Technology and Development, 21(1-2), 77–98. doi: 10.1080/09718524.2017.1385312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buskens, I. (2010). Agency and reflexivity in ICT4D research: Questioning women’s options, poverty, and human development. Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Buskens, I., & Webb, A. (2009). African women and ICTs. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology-GST. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, H., Levy, M., & Ilavarasan, V. (2010). The limited Impact of ICTs on microenterprise growth: A study of businesses owned by women in urban India. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, T. R., Segatto, A. P., & Frega, J. R. (2015). Analysing ICT and development from the perspective of the capabilities approach: A study in South Brazil. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 67, 1–14. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00480.x
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S. (2002). Development as freedom: The spaces of Amartya Sen. Progress in Development Studies, 2, 183–217. doi:10.1191/1464993402ps037ra
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, F. (2006). Empowerment to participate: A case study of participation by Indian sex workers in HIV prevention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 301–315. doi:10.1002/casp.866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasuki, S. I., & Abbott, P. (2015). A socio‐technical analysis of ICT investments in developing countries: A capability perspective. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 67, 1–29. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00484.x
   Google Scholar
• Dasuki, S. I., Abbott, P., & Azerikatoa, D. (2014). ICT and empowerment to participate: A capability approach. Information Development, 30, 321–331. doi:10.1177/0266666913485259
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, S. (2001). Sen’s entitlement approach: Critiques and counter-critiques. Oxford Development Studies, 29, 245–263. doi:10.1080/13600810120088859
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O. P. M. (2011). Gender digital divide: The role of mobile phones amongst Latina farm workers in Southeast Ohio. Gender, Technology and Development, 15, 53–74. doi:10.1177/097185241101500103
   Google Scholar
• Gigler, B. S. (2004). Including the excluded-Can ICTs empower poor communities? Towards an alternative evaluation framework based on the capability approach. In 4th International conference on the capability approach. University of Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Grunfeld, H., Hak, S., & Pin, T. (2011). Understanding benefits realisation of iREACH from a capability approach perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 151–172. doi:10.1007/s10676-011-9268-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatakka, M., & Lagsten, J. (2012). The capability approach as a tool for development evaluation–analyzing students’ use of internet resources. Information Technology for Development, 18, 23–41. doi:10.1080/02681102.2011.617722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? Journal of International Development, 22, 625–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITU. (2005). ITU Internet Reports 2005: The Internet of Things. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/tunis/newsroom/stats/The-Internet-of-Things-2005.pdf (accessed 2016, February 31).
   Google Scholar
• Jagun, A., Heeks, R., & Whalley, J. (2008). The Impact of mobile telephony on developing country enterprise: A Nigerian case study. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 47–65. doi:10.1162/itid.2008.00026
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, A., & Zheng, Y. (2017). A spatial perspective of innovation and development: Innovation hubs in Zambia and the UK. In: Choudrie J., Islam M., Wahid F., Bass J., Priyatma J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Development. ICT4D 2017. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 504. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_15.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, J. (2007). Technology as empowerment: A capability approach to computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 73–87. doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9127-x
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on measurements of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–302. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivunike, F. N., Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M., & Tusubira, F. F. (2011). Perceptions of the role of ICT on quality of life in rural communities in Uganda. Information Technology for Development, 17, 61–80. doi:10.1080/02681102.2010.511698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D. (2010). ICT4WHAT?—Using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development. Journal of International Development, 22, 674–692. doi:10.1002/jid.1719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, S., & Nair-Reichert, U. (2008). Empowering women through ICT-based business initiatives: An overview of best practices in e-commerce/e-retailing projects. Information Technologies & International Development, 4, 43. doi:10.1162/itid.2008.00007
   Google Scholar
• Masika, R., & Bailur, S. (2015). Negotiating women’s agency through ICTs: A comparative study of Uganda and India. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1), 43–69. doi:10.1177/0971852414561615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, D. (2005). Conceptual framework and methodological challenges. In D. Narayan (Ed.). Measuring empowerment: Cross disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. (2006). National Core Welfare Indicators Survey 2006. Retrieved from http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/nada/index.php/catalog/30 (accessed 2016, February 31).
   Google Scholar
• National Population Commission. (2006). The 2006 Census report. Retrieved from http://www.population.gov.ng/index.php/censuses (accessed 2016, February 31).
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, V. (2000). Development and quality of life: A critique of Amartya Sen’s development as freedom. International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation, 30, 661–674. doi:10.2190/10XK-UYUC-E9P1-CLFX
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTS. (2016). Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report. Retrieved from www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/download/438
   Google Scholar
• Nyemba-Mudenda, M., & Chigona, W. (2017). mHealth outcomes for pregnant mothers in Malawi: A capability perspective. Information Technology for Development, 1–34. doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1397594
   Google Scholar
• Oates, B. J. (2006). Researching information systems and computing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oreglia, E., & Srinivasan, J. (2016). ICT, intermediaries, and the transformation of gendered power structures. MIS Quarterly, 40, 501–510.. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panchanadeswaran, S., Unnithan, A. M., Chacko, S., Brazda, M., & Kuruppu, S. (2017). What’s technology got to do with it? Exploring the impact of mobile phones on female sex workers’ lives and livelihood in India. Gender, Technology and Development, 21, 152–167. doi:10.1080/09718524.2017.1385318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parpart, J. (2002). Lessons from the field. Rethinking empowerment gender and development from a post (post-?) development perspective. In Sauders, K., Feminist post-development thought: rethinking modernity, postcolonialism and representation, London, England, Zed Books
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: Theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6, 93–117. doi:10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2015). Information and communication technology in transition economies: An assessment of research trends. Information Technology for Development, 21, 330–364. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2014.891498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. (1998). Empowerment through residence. Housing Studies, 13, 233–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa, D., Sein, M. K., & Saebø, Ø. (2012). Building collective capabilities through ICT in a mountain region of Nepal: Where social capital leads to collective action. Information Technology for Development, 18, 5–22. doi:10.1080/02681102.2011.643205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toboso, M. (2011). Rethinking disability in Amartya Sen’s approach: ICT and equality of opportunity. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 107–118. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9254-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauth, E. M. (2013). The role of theory in gender and information systems research. Information and Organization, 23, 277–293. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, U. S. (2015). Women and poverty in Nigeria: Agenda for poverty eradication. Women, 5(3), 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 18–41. doi:10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2010). ICTs for the broader development of India: An analysis of the literature. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 41, 1. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2010.tb00293.x
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. L. (2008). Empowerment zones? Women, Internet cafés, and life transformations in Egypt. Information Technologies & International Development, 4, 89. doi:10.1162/itid.2008.00009
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Information Technology & People, 21, 222–243. doi:10.1108/09593840810896000
   Google Scholar