Factors influencing technology use by Mayan women in the digital age

References

• Agwu, J., & Okhimamwe, A. (2009). Gender and climate change in Nigeria. Lagos, Nigeria: Heinrich Böll Stiftung (HBS).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. (2015). India's Gender Digital Divide: Women and Politics on Twitter. In Observer Research Foundation (pp. 1–8). ORS: New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ORFIssueBrief_108.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R., & Feder, G. (2007). Agricultural extension. In R. Evenson, & P. Pingali (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics (pp. 2344–2367). Washington, DC: Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, C., McLain, B., & Eger, E. (2016). Women in Tech: The Facts 2016 update. See what’s changed and what hasn’t. National Center for Woman & Information Technology. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/womenintech_facts_fullreport_05132016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J., Black, R., & Curtis, A. (2008). Exploring the digital divide in an Australian Regional City: a case study of Albury. Australian Geographer, 39, 479–493. doi:10.1080/00049180802419203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., Waycott, J., Pedell, S., Hoang, T., & Ozanne, E. (2016). Older People and Social Participation: From Touch-Screens to Virtual Realities. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations (pp. 34–43). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, Y., Bradley, D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. (2013). Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 1715–1724. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman, J.A., Bryan, E., & Goh, A. (2014). Gender, climate change, and group-based approaches to adaptation. In C. Ringler, A. R. Quisumbing, E. Bryan, & R. Meinzen-Dick (Eds) Enhancing women’s assets to manage risk under climate change: Potential for group-based approaches. Climate change, collective action and women’s assets (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S. (2008). Benefits from rural ICT applications in India: Reducing transaction costs and enhancing transparency? LIRNEasia presentation at Public Lecture on ICT in Agriculture, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://www.lirneasia.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/bhatnagar_transaction-costs-and-icts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2013). The Global Information Technology Report 2013. Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boggino, N., & Rosekrans, K. (2007). Investigación-acción: reflexión crítica sobre la práctica docente. [Action research: Critical reflection about teaching practices] Ed: Homo Sapiens. Spain. Retrived from https://biblioteca.unirioja.es/biba/mas_info.php?-titn=277699
   Google Scholar
• British Council. (2016). Gender equality and empowerment of women and girls in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/gender_equality_an_empowerment_in_the_uk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cano, E. (2005). Cómo mejorar las competencias de los docentes. Guía para la autoevaluación y el desarrollo de las competencias del profesorado. [How to improve teaching competences. Guide for self-assessment and development of teachers’ competences] Ed. Graó. Barcelona. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/42159/24113
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., & Hartl, M. (2010). Lightening the Load: Labour saving technologies and practices for rural women. Rugby, UK: International Fund for Agricultural Development and Practical Action.
   Google Scholar
• Castaño, C., Martín, J., & Martínez, J. (2011). La brecha digital de género en España y Europa: medición con indicadores compuestos [Digital divide and gender in Spain and Europe: measurement and composite indicators]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, October-December, 127–140. DOI:10.5477/cis/reis.136.127
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). Charting Digital Divides: Comparing Socioeconomic, Gender, Life Stage, and Rural-Urban Internet Access and Use in Five Countries. In W. Dutton, B. Kahin, R. O'Callaghan & A. Wyckoff (Eds). Transforming Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y., Kwong, C., Chu, J., & Ping, V. (2010). Digital divide and social inclusion: policy challenge for social development. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 3, 37–52. DOI:10.1080/17516231003634161
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (1981). The material of male power. Feminist Review, 9, 41–58. doi:10.1057/fr.1981.19
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: the especial case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne-Simard, D., Galarneau, D., & Larochelle-Coté, S. (2016). Woman in scientific occupations in Canada. Statistical Information Service. Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2016001/article/14643-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, L.J., Correa, T., Straubhaar, J., Covarrubias, L., Graber, D., Spence, J., & Rojas, V. (2014). Gendered Space: The Digital Divide between Male and Female Users in Internet Public Access Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 991–1009. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez, J. (2015). Desarrollo de competencias en el uso de las TIC en profesores de ciencias de secundaria. [Competence development about the use of ICT of science secondary education teachers]. Universidad de Granada, Spain. Retrieved from: https://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/25613376.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez, G., Canto, P., Ortega, J., & McCalman, D. (2016). Raising the technological competence of high school science and mathematics. Teachers of Mexico through delivery of an online program. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 16, 163–180. doi:10.1504/IJTPM.2016.076317
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez, J., Vázquez, I., Suaste, M., & Cab, V. (2016). Reducción de la brecha digital en PJA de comunidades vulnerables de Yucatán. [Digital divide reduction in PJA on vulnerable communities in Yucatan]. Research Project FCYA-2016-0001W. Mexico: K Kellogg Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Duflo, E., & Udry, C. (2003). Intrahousehold resource allocation in Côte d’Ivoire: Social norms, separate accounts and consumption choices (Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper 857). New Haven, CT, US: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (2005). El Cambio Educativo desde la Investigación Acción. (4aEd). [The educational change from action research]. Open University Press. Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Research Service (2015). Bridging the digital divide in the EU. Members´ Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/573884/EPRS_BRI(2015)573884_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, L., Sabatini, J., & Wagner, D. (2000). Basic skills in Adult Education and the Digital Divide in Learning to Bridge the Digital Divide. OECD Publishing: Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264187764-en
   Google Scholar
• Gobierno de la República de Mexico (2013). Estrategia Digital Nacional [National Digital Strategy] November, Mexico. Retrieved from http://cdn.mexicodigital.gob.mx/EstrategiaDigital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goh, A. (2012). A literature review of the gender-differentiated impacts of climate change on women’s and men’s assets and well-being in developing countries. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• González, N., Sedeño, A., & González, V. (2012). Diseño de un focus group para valorar la competencia mediática en escenarios familiares [Design of focus group to assess mediatic competences in family setting]. ICONO, 14, 116–133. DOI:10.7195/ri14.v10i3.191
   Google Scholar
• GSMA (2010). Women & Mobile: A Global Opportunity – A Study on the Mobile Phone Gender Gap in Low- and Middle-income Countries. London. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/GSMA_Women_and_Mobile-A_Global_Opportunity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GSMA Connected Women (2015). Bridging the gender gap: Mobile access and usage in low- and middle-income countries. London: GSMA Connected Women
   Google Scholar
• Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2014). Gender equality in the information society: a review of current literature and recommendations for policy and practice. Retrieved from http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/4/document/1409/Gender%20and%20ICTs%20briefing%202014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huyer, S., Twyman, J., Koningstein, M., Ashby, J., & Vermeulen, S. (2015). Supporting women farmers in a changing climate: Five policy lessons. Agriculture and Food Security Programme. Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Climate Change. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/60479/retrieve
   Google Scholar
• INE [Instituto Nacional de Estadística] (2016). Anuario Estadístico de España. [Statistical Yearbook of Spain]. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/prodyser/pubweb/anuarios_mnu.htm
   Google Scholar
• INEGI [Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía] (2010). Panorama sociodemográfico de Yucatán. Censo de Población y Vivienda México. [Sociodemographic overview of Yucatan. Population and housing censuses in Mexico]. Retrieved from http://coespo.yucatan.gob.mx/general/31_Panorama_Yuc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intel (2012). Women and the Web: Bridging the Internet Gap and Creating New Global Opportunities in Low and Middle-income Countries. Retrieved from http://www.intel.in/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/pdf/women-andthe-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Development Bank (2012). Bridging Gaps, Building Opportunity – Broadband as a Catalyst of Economic Growth and Social Progress in Latin America and the Caribbean. Understanding the Digital Divide. OECD Publications, Paris: France.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union. (2015). Measuring the information society 2015. Geneva: ITU. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2015/MISR2015-w5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jost, C., Kyazze, F., Naab, J., Neelormi, S., Kinyangi, J., Zougmore, R., … Kristjanson, P. (2015). Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities. Climate and Development, 8, 1–12. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1050978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyazze, F. B., Owoyesigire, B., Kristjanson, P., & Chaudhary, M. (2012). Using a gender lens to explore farmers’ adaptation options in the face of climate change: Results of a pilot study in Ghana (Work Paper No. 26). Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Programme. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/23017
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the Internet, and Social Media. Pew Research Center Internet & Technology. Report. February.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. (Ed.). (1987). Gender and expertise. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (1995). Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Standards of Educational Technology[ISTE] (2007). National Educational Technology Standards (NETS·S) and Performance Indicators for Students. Retrieved from https://www.pobschools.org/cms/lib/NY01001456/Centricity/Domain/45/Ed%20Tech%20Resources/ISTENETS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. France: OECD Publications. Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2013). Capturing Digital Dividends and Closing Digital Divides. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pcd/Capturing%20Digital%20Divides.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2017). Construir un México inclusivo. Políticas y Buena Gobernanza para la Igualdad de Género. [Build an inclusive Mexico. Policies and Good Governance for Gender Equality] Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265493-en
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, C., Jones, E. M., Kristjanson, P., Cramer, L., Thornton, P. K., Forch, W., & Barahona, C. (2015). How resilient are farming households and communities to a changing climate in Africa? A gender-based perspective. Global Environmental Change, 34, 95–107. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A., & Taylor, B. (1980). Sex and skill: Notes towards a feminist economics. Feminist Review, 6, 79–88. doi:10.1057/fr.1980.20
   Google Scholar
• Plan Estatal de Desarrollo (2012–2018) [Mexican State Development Plan]. Gobierno del Estado de Yucatán. Mérida; Yucatán, México. Retrieved from http://www.yucatan.gob.mx/docs/ped/PED-2012-2018-Yuc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C., & Mei Chang, A. (2016). Woman in Tech as a Driver for Growth in Emerging Economies. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/report/women-tech-driver-growth-emerging-economies
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. (2005). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Premi Devi, W., & Somokanta, T. (2016). Gender, technology, and work: case of women employees in selected food processing industries in Manipur. Gender, Technology and Development, 20, 81–104. doi:10.1177/0971852415619497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purushothaman, A., & Zhou, C. (2014). Change toward a creative society in developing contexts—women’s barriers to learning by information and communication technology. Gender, Technology and Development, 18, 363–386. doi:10.1177/0971852414544008
   Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 283–327. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragasa, C. (2012). Improving gender-responsiveness on agricultural extension. In A. R. Quisumbing, R. Meinzen-Dick, T. L. Raney, A. Croppenstedt, J. A. Behrman & A. Peterman (Eds), Gender in agriculture and food security: Closing the knowledge gap (pp. 411–430). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A.T. (2017). Inclusive capitalism and development: case studies of telecenters fostering inclusion through ICTs in Bangladesh. Information Technologies & International Development, 13, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, I., & Kuriyan, R. (2012). Poverty and profits in the information age. Information Technologies & International Development, 8, iii–viii.
   Google Scholar
• Schinzel, B. (2017). Women in computing and the contingency of informatics cultures. In: H. Werthner and F. Van Harmelen (Ed.). Informatics in the future: proceedings of the 11th European Computer Science Summit (ECSS 2015), 1st ed, (pp. 3–7). [online] Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-55735-9_8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schleife, K. (2008). Regional versus individual aspects of the digital divide Germany. Centre for European economic research. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp06085.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Servon, L. (Ed.) (2002). Bridging the Digital Divide. Technology, community and public policy. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sharaievska, I. (2012). Family and Marital Satisfaction and the use of Social Network Technologies. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Recreation, Sport and Tourism, EEUU.
   Google Scholar
• Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C.B. (2014). Understanding the agricultural input landscape in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recent plot, household, and community level evidence (Policy Research Working Paper 7014). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2003). Five principles for research ethics. Monitor Staff, 34 (1). Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/monitor/jan03/principles.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, J., Almerich, G., Gargallo, L., & Aliaga, F. (2010). Las competencias en TIC del profesorado y su relación con el uso de los recursos tecnológicos. [Teachers’ competences in ICT and their relation with the use of the technological resources] Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 18(10), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, A., Hansen, J., Jay, A., Campbell, B., Kinyangi, J., Aggarwal, P.K., & Zougmoré, R. (2014). Scaling up climate services for farmers: Mission possible. Learning from good practice in Africa and South Asia (CCAFS Report No. 13). Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).
   Google Scholar
• Twyman, J. (2014) Adaptation actions in Africa: evidence that gender matters (CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/51391
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2003). Science, Technology and Gender and International Report. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Francia: Science and Technology for Development series UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154045
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2017). Leaving no one behind: from digital divide to digital empowerment.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: a longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. Journal Information, Comunication & Society, 18, 782–797. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.994544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Journal Information Society, 19, 315–326. doi:10.1080/01972240309487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneswara, P. (2013). The digital Divide in India. Inferences from the information and communication technology workforce. In M. Ragnedda, & G.W. Muschert (Eds.). The Digital Divide. The internet and social inequality in international perspective (pp. 134–140). Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, USA: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., Dragne, C., & Lucas, A. (2014). Women in Computer Sciences in Romania: Success and Sacrifice. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 4, 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.jielusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/WomenInComputerSciences2014Fall231.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. (1989). Office automation: The labor process and women’s work in Britain. Hemel Hempstead, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. (1992). Language, technology, gender, and power. Human Relations, 45, 883–904. doi:10.1177/001872679204500902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WISE (2015). Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: The Talent Pipeline from Classroom to Boardroom. UK: WISE Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/uploads/wise/files/WISE_UK_Statistics_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank & IFPRI (2010). Gender and governance in rural services: Insights from India, Ghana and Ethiopia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Retrieved from https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar