Relevant local content, social influence, digital literacy, and attitude toward the use of digital technologies by women in Uganda

References

• Abdullah, Z. D., Ziden, A. B. A., Aman, R. B. C., & Mustafa, K. I. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards information technology and the relationship with their academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(4), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6158
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. A., Brown, L. J., And., & Astell, J. A. (2019). Older adults’ perspectives on using digital technology to maintain good mental health: Interactive group study. J Med Interne Res, 21(2), e11694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet, 2014(4), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carcary, M. (2008). The evaluation of ICT investment performance in terms of its functional deployment. A study of organizational ability to leverage advantage from banner MIS. In Institute of Technology in Ireland, Limerick Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davaki, K. (2018). The underlying causes of the digital gender gap and possible solutions for enhanced digital inclusion of and girls. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Global System for Mobile Communication Association. (2015a). Accelerating digital literacy: Empowering to use the mobile internet. Retrieved March 03, 2019, from: https://www.gsma.com/
   Google Scholar
• Global System for Mobile Communication Association. (2015b). Mobile phones, internet, and gender in Myanmar. London: GSMA. Retrieved October 12, 2018 from: https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/
   Google Scholar
• Global System for Mobile Communication Association (2020). Connected Women The Mobile Gender Gap Report 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from: https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GSMA-The-Mobile-Gender-Gap-Report-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hafkin, N., & Taggart, N. (2001). Gender, information technology, and developing countries: An analytic study. https://usaid.gov/wid/pubs/it01/htm.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113499113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). (2012). Connectivity: How mobile phones, computers and the internet can catalyse ’s entrepreneurship. Retrieved from https://www.icrw.org/publications/connectivity-how-mobile-phones-computers-and-the-internet-can-catalyze-womens-entrepreneurship/
   Google Scholar
• ITU. 2016. ITU facts & figures. Geneva: ITU. Retrieved October 18, 2018, from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ITU. 2017. ITU facts & figures. Geneva: ITU. Retrieved October 18, 2018, from: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jope, A. (2017). Gender equality is 170 years away. We cannot wait that long. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekhanya, L. M. (2013). Cultural influence on the diffusion and adoption of social media technologies by entrepreneurs in rural south. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 12(12), 1563. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v12i12.8250
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, M. (2018). Women's safety online: A driver of gender inequality in internet access. Retrieved December 22, 2020, from: https://news.itu.int/womens-safety-online-gender-inequality-in-internet-access/
   Google Scholar
• Melhem, S., Morell, C., & Tandon, N. (2009). Information and communication technologies for 's socio-economic empowerment. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Meraz, S. (2008). and technology: How socialization created a gender gap. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft, UNESCO, UN & ITU. 2014. Girls in STEM and ICT careers: The path toward gender equality. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from http://www2.tku.edu.tw/
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, G. G. (2010). Information technology and gender gap: toward a global view. The Electronic Library, 28(5), 722–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, B. P. (1994). Testing the proportional hazards assumption in the presence of unmeasured heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Economics, 9(3), 321–334.
   Google Scholar
• National Information Technology Authority [NITA] Survey2017/18 Report. Retrieved November 10, 2018, https://www.nita.go.ug/sites/
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A. D., Fransson, G., & Lindberg, J. O. (2019). A study of the use of digital technology and its conditions with a view to understanding what adequate digital competence may mean in a national policy initiative. Educational studies. 1–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic, Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide; Upskill, Innovate.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, D. A., Dhere, A. M., & Pawar, C. B. (2009). ICT and empowerment of rural and deprived in Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1018529120090101
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National institute of environmental sciences. Retrieved October 27, 2019, from: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/
   Google Scholar
• Rhema, A., & Miliszewska, I. (2014). Analysis of student attitudes towards e-learning: The case of engineering students in Libya. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, J. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences. Holt Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Sandys, E. (2005). Gender equality and empowerment of through ICT. 2000 and beyond.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (1997). Students’ attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16–19 education. Computers & Education, 28(1), 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
   Google Scholar
• Souter, D., & Anri, V. D. S. (2018). Women’s didgital inclusion, background aper for the G20. Retrieved from https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/womens-digital-inclusion-background-paper-g20
   Google Scholar
• Truckenbrod, J. (1993). Women and the social construction of computing culture: Evolving new forms of computing. AI & Soc, 7, 345–357.
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Bureau of Statistic [UBOS]. (2014). National Population and Housing Census 2014. Retrieved from https://www.ubos.org/publications
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2012). United Nations E-Government Survey 2012. E-Government for the people. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/connecting-governments-to-citizens
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A., Van Dijk, J., & Peters, O. (2012). Proposing a survey instrument for measuring operational, formal, information and strategic internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.670086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2013). The gender digital divide [Unpublished Master thesis]. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Zher, S. Y., & Chye, C. S. (2017). Developing a digital literacy scale & measuring digital divide using PIAAC data [Paper presentation]. 4thPIAAC International Conference Singapore.
   Google Scholar