How the European union deals with surrogacy. Birth without borders as a driver of value conflicts?

References

• Arcilesbica. (2017). DOCUMENTO CONGRESSUALE: A mali estremi, lesbiche estreme. http://www.arcilesbica.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/a-mali-estremi-lesbiche-estreme_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, P. M., & Paternotte D. (Eds.). (2014). LGBT activism and the making of Europe: A rainbow Europe?. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barroche, J. (2012). État, libéralisme et christianisme: Critique de la subsidiarité européenne. Dalloz.
   Google Scholar
• Bastié, E. (2016, February 03). À l’Assemblée, une mobilisation internationale contre la GPA. Le Figaro. https://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2016/02/03/01016-20160203ARTFIG00054–l-assemblee-une-mobilisation-internationale-contre-la-gpa.php
   Google Scholar
• Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2001). Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budde, E. T., Knill, C., Fernández-I-Marín, X., & Preidel, C. (2018). A matter of timing: The religious factor and morality policies. Governance, 31(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Court of Justice of the European Union. (2014). Cases C-167/12 C. D. v S. T. and C-363/12 Z. v A Government department and the Board of management of a community school. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/CJE_14_36
   Google Scholar
• DasGupta, S., & Dasgupta, S. D. (Eds.). (2014). Globalization and transnational surrogacy in India: Outsourcing life. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Engeli, I., Green-Pedersen, C., & Larsen, L. T. (Eds.). (2012). Morality politics in Western Europe: Parties, agendas and policy choices. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Euchner, E.-M. (2019). Morality politics in a secular age: Strategic parties and divided governments in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Euchner, E.-M., & Engeli, I. (2018). Conflicts over values in the European multilevel space: The case of morality issues. In F. Foret & O. Calligaro (Eds.), European values: Challenges and opportunities for EU governance (pp. 65–79). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Euchner, E.-M., & Knill, C. (2015). Prostitution: Sin, unavoidable evil, or recognized profession? In C. Knill, S. Hurka, & C. Adam (Eds.), On the road to permissiveness?: Change and convergence of moral regulation in Europe (pp. 129–156). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2015). Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0470_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Women’s Lobby. (2015a, May 08). EWL puts the issue of surrogacy on the European agenda. https://www.womenlobby.org/EWL-puts-the-issue-of-surrogacy-on-the-European-agenda
   Google Scholar
• European Women’s Lobby. (2015b). Stop surrogacy now! https://www.womenlobby.org/Stop-Surrogacy-Now?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Feminist International Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Enginnering. (2016). How FINRRAGE works. https://www.finrrage.org/
   Google Scholar
• Fenton-Glynn, C. (2017). International surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Private International Law, 13(3), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2017.1385901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, P. (2009). Voyage to the heart of Europe, 1953–2009: A history of the Christian-Democratic group and the group of the European People’s Party in the European Parliament. Éditions Racine.
   Google Scholar
• Foret, F. (2014). Religion at the European Parliament: Purposes, scope and limits of a survey on the religious beliefs of MEPs. Religion, State & Society, 42(2–3), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2014.950909
   Google Scholar
• Foret, F. (2015). Religion and politics in the European Union: The secular canopy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foret, F., & Rubio Grundell, L. (2020). European morality politics and European values in the EU: The case of Prostitution. Sexuality & Culture, 24(6), 1798–1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09720-w
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem-cells and the future of kinship. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., & Johnson, M. (2018). Editorial. Reproductive BioMedicine & Society Online, 7, 158–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, J. (2015). Modern families: Stories of extraordinary journeys to kinship. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giusberti, C. (2018, March 25). L’utero in affitto spacca ArciLesbica: La sezione bolognese se ne va. La Repubblica. https://bologna.repubblica.it/cronaca/2018/03/25/news/divorzio_bologna_arcilesbica-192153456/
   Google Scholar
• Hague Conference on Private International Law. (2014). The desirability and feasibility of further work on the parentage/surrogacy project. https://assets.hcch.net/upload/wop/gap2014pd03b_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heichel, S., Knill, C., & Schmitt, S. (2013). Public policy meets morality: Conceptual and theoretical challenges in the analysis of morality policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.761497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl, R. (2010). Constitutional theocracy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (2011). Emotional life on the market frontier. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. (2015). Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF soujourns in global Dubai. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Lesbian Gay Association. (2014). ILGA-Europe’s key demands for the recognition of diverse families. https://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/ilga-europes_policy_on_family_revised_2014_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Fernández-I-Marín, X., Budde, E., & Heichel, S. (2020). Religious tides: The time-variant effect of religion on morality policies. Regulation & Governance, 14(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2018). International solidarity in reproductive justice: Surrogacy and gender-inclusive polymaternalism. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1425286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leustean, L. N. (Ed.). (2013). Representing religion in the European Union: Does God matter?. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, A. (2014). The rhetoric of choice: The feminist debates on reproductive choice in the commercial surrogacy arrangement in India. Gender, Technology & Development, 18(2), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852414529484
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2019). Inaction and public policy: Understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’. Policy Sciences, 52(4), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09362-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2018). Between Christian and multicultural democracy: Religious legacies and minority politics. West European Politics, 41(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1343967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondo, É. (2018). Human dignity in EU bioethics politics: A bridge-building incentive or a conflict-driving force? In F. Foret & O. Calligaro (Eds.), European values. Challenges and opportunities for EU governance (pp. 46–64). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z. (Ed.). (2001). Public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy. Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen, B. F., & Guth, J. L. (2015). Religion and the struggle for European Union: Confessional culture and the limits of integration. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panitch, V. (2013). Global surrogacy: Exploitation to empowerment. Journal of Global Ethics, 9(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2013.818390
   Google Scholar
• Parry, P. (2018). Surrogate labour: Exceptional for whom? Economy & Society, 47(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2018.1487180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralat, R. (2018). More natural does not equal more normal: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people’s views about different pathways to parenthood. Journal of Family Issues, 39(18), 4179–4203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18810951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., & Due, C. (2013). Representations of reproductive citizenship and vulnerability in media reports of offshore surrogacy. Citizenship Studies, 17(8), 956–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.851145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigon, A., Chateau, C. (2016). Regulating international surrogacy arrangements - state of play. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/571368/IPOL_BRI(2016)571368_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (1994). Love, power and knowledge: Towards a feminist transformation of the sciences. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, S. (2015). Discounted life: The price of global surrogacy in India. York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanan, S. (2018). A transnational feminist view of surrogacy biomarkets in India. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2018). The values of the Court of Justice of the European Union. In F. Foret, & O. Calligaro (Eds.), European values: Challenges and opportunities for EU governance (pp. 99–115). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schurr, C., & Militz, E. (2018). The affective economy of transnational surrogacy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1626–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18769652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E. S. (2009). Surrogacy and the politics of commodification. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(3), 109–146.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community. (2015). Opinion of the reflection group on bioethics on gestational surrogacy: The question of European and international rules. http://www.comece.eu/dl/nLpuJKJnmLLJqx4KJK/Surrogacy_EN_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shalev, C. (1989). Birth power: The case for surrogacy. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smietana, M. (2018). Procreative consciousness in a global market: Gay men’s paths to surrogacy in the USA. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 7, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.03.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steven, M. (2020). The European conservatives and reformists: Politics, parties and policies. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studlar, D. T., Cagossi, A., & Duval, R. D. (2013). Is morality policy different? Institutional explanations for post-war Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.761503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuvøy, I. (2018). Troublesome reproduction: Surrogacy under scrutiny. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 7, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.015
   Google Scholar
• Tatalovich, R., & Daynes, B. W. (Eds.). (2011). Moral controversies in American politics. M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twine, F. W. (2015). Outsourcing the womb: Race, class and gestational surrogacy in a global market. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2019). Report on safeguards for the protection of the rights of children born from surrogacy arrangements. https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/37/60
   Google Scholar
• Vora, K. (2015). Life support: Biocapital and the new history of outsourced labor. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• VoteWatch Europe. (2015). Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter. https://term8.votewatch.eu/en/term8-annual-report-on-human-rights-and-democracy-in-the-world-2014-and-the-eu-policy-on-the-matter-motion-29.html#/##vote-tabs-list-1
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (2016). Exploitation in International paid surrogacy arrangements. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar