References
- Akiwowo, S. (2021). Does the online safety bill work for women, especially women of colour? Medium. https://medium.com/@glitchuk_/does-the-online-safety-bill-work-for-women-especially-women-of-colour-f76591c8872b
- Amnesty International. (2018). Toxic Twitter—A toxic place for women. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2018/03/online-violence-against-women-chapter-1/
- Athar, R. (2015). From impunity to justice: Improving corporate policies to end technology-related violence against women. Association for Progressive Communications. https://genderit.org/sites/default/files/flow_corporate_policies_formatted_final_1.pdf
- Barratt, S. A. (2018). Reinforcing sexism and misogyny: Social media, symbolic violence and the construction of femininity-as-fail. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 19(3), 16–31.
- Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the power out of empowerment–An experiential account. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469559
- BCS The Chartered Institute for IT. (2020, September 23). Record numbers of women in IT - But black women still under-represented, new research finds | BCS. https://www.bcs.org/about-us/press-office/press-releases/record-numbers-of-women-in-it-but-black-women-still-under-represented-new-research-finds/
- Bell, D., & Belt, D. (2021). Gender diversity in the silicon valley. A comparison of large public companies and silicon valley companies 2020 proxy season. Fenwick. https://assets.fenwick.com/documents/Fenwick-Gender-Diversity-Survey-2020.pdf
- Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
- Bernal, P. (2018). The Internet, warts and all: Free speech, privacy and truth (Vol. 48). Cambridge University Press.
- Bilge, S., & Collins, P. H. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity.
- Bradley, A. (2019). Did we forget about power. In R. McGee, & J. Pettit (Eds.), Power, empowerment and social change (pp. 101–116). Routledge.
- Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference. In m. Peters, M. Olssen, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Futures of critical theory: Dreams of difference (pp. 239–259). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Burris, A. (2014). Hell hath no fury like a woman porned: Revenge porn and the need for a federal nonconsensual pornography statute. Florida Law Review, 66, 2325.
- Cahn, A. F. (2021, May 13). Apple’s AirTags are a gift to stalkers. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-apples-air-tags-are-a-gift-to-stalkers/
- Carlson, C. R., & Rousselle, H. (2020). Report and repeat: Investigating Facebook’s hate speech removal process. First Monday 25(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i2.10288
- Clark-Parsons, R. (2018). Building a digital Girl Army: The cultivation of feminist safe spaces online. New Media & Society, 20(6), 2125–2144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731919
- Cockburn, C., & Ormrod, S. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Cohen, J. E. (2020). Networks, standards, and network-and-standard-based governance. In K. Werbach (Ed.), After the digital tornado: Networks, algorithms, humanity (pp. 58–80). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/after-the-digital-tornado/networks-standards-and-networkandstandardbased-governance/171AAEAB5AAA8E7DB94B0E0164792CBA
- Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Polity Press.
- Corneliussen, H. G., Herman, C., & Gajjala, R. (2018). ICT changes everything! But who changes ICT?. In D. Kreps, C. Ess, L. Leenen, & K. Kimppa (Eds.), This changes everything – ICT and climate change: What can we do? (Vol. 537, pp. 250–257). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_18
- Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019a). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
- Couldry, N., & Mejías, U. A. (2019b). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
- Dé, R., Pal, A., Sethi, R., Reddy, S. K., & Chitre, C. (2018). ICT4D research: A call for a strong critical approach. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1286284
- Dignam, P. A., & Rohlinger, D. A. (2019). Misogynistic men online: How the red pill helped elect trump. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1086/701155
- D’ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press.
- Dunn, S. (2020). Technology-facilitated gender-based violence: An overview (Supporting a Safer Internet Paper No. 1). Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/SaferInternet_Paper%20no%201_0.pdf
- Easter, B. (2018). “Feminist_brevity_in_light_of_masculine_long-windedness:” Code, space, and online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447335
- End Violence Against Women Coalition. (2021). VAWG principles for the online safety bill (pp. 265–275). https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/VAWG-Principles-for-the-Online-Safety-Bill-150921.pdf
- Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
- Eyben, R., Kabeer, N., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Conceptualising empowerment and the implications for pro-poor growth: A paper for the DAC poverty network. Institute of Development Studies.
- Faith, B., & Fraser, E. (2018). What works to prevent cyber violence against women and girls? (VAWG Helpdesk Research Report No. 212). VAWG Helpdesk. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14764
- Faith, B., & Fraser, E. (2019). Digital harassment of women leaders: A review of the evidence (VAWG Helpdesk Research Report No. 209). Department for International Development. https://www.sddirect.org.uk/media/1630/q-209-digital-harassment-of-women-leaders-bibliography.pdf
- Flood, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Pease, B. (2018). Resistance and backlash to gender equality: An evidence review. Crime and Justice Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology. https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/-/media/ResourceCentre/PublicationsandResources/PVAW/Backlash/Resistance-and-Backlash-to-Gender-Equality–-Evidence-Review.pdf
- Fraser, D. E., & Martineau-Searle, L. (2018). Nature and prevalence of cyber violence against women and girls VAWG Helpdesk Research Report No. 211 VAWG Helpdesk.
- Full force: Why the world works better when girls go to school. (2018). Malala Fund. https://fullforce.malala.org/
- Gajjala, R., & Mamidipudi, A. (1999). Cyberfeminism, technology, and international “development.” Gender and Development, 7(2), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/741923122
- Gaventa, J. (2005). Reflections on the uses of the ‘power cube’ approach for analysing spaces, places and dynamics of civil society participation and engagement (No. 4; CPF Evaluation Series 2003–2006). MFP Breed Netwerk. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.115.8099&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00320.x
- Gaventa, J. (2020). Applying power analysis: Using the ‘Powercube’ to explore forms, levels and spaces. In R. McGee & J. Pettit (Eds.), Power, empowerment and social change (pp. 117–138). Routledge.
- Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
- Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
- Girl Effect. (2018). Real girls, real lives, connected: A global study of access and usage of mobile, told through 3000 voices. https://global.girleffect.org/stories/real-girls-real-lives-connected/
- Glitch UK and End Violence Against Women Coalition. (2020). The ripple effect COVID-19 and the epidemic of online abuse. https://glitchcharity.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Glitch-The-Ripple-Effect-Report-COVID-19-online-abuse.pdf
- GSMA Intelligence. (2020). The mobile gender gap report 2020. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/GSMA-The-Mobile-Gender-Gap-Report-2020.pdf
- Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2017). A feminist action framework on development and digital technologies. Association for Progressive Communications. https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/feminist-action-framework-development-and-digital-technologies
- Hadley, L. (2017). Tackling domestic abuse in a digital age. Women’s Aid/All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Domestic Violence. https://1q7dqy2unor827bqjls0c4rn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/APPGReport2017-270217.pdf
- Hafkin, N. (2000). Convergence of concepts: Gender and ICTs in Africa. In E. M. Rathgeber, & E. O. Adera (Eds.), Gender and the information revolution in Africa (pp. 1–16). IDRC.
- Haraway, D. (1987). A manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1987.9961538
- Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2016). Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social & Legal Studies, 25(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663915624273
- Henry, N., Powell, A., & Flynn, A. (2017). Not just ‘revenge pornography’: Australians’ experiences of image-based abuse. RMIT University.
- hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.
- Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: resurrecting "patriarchy" as a theoretical tool. Violence against Women, 15(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246
- International Foundation for Electoral Systems. (2021). Assessment of online violence against politically and civically engaged women in Bangladesh. https://www.ifes.org/publications/assessment-online-violence-against-politically-and-civically-engaged-women-bangladesh
- Jackson, S. J., & Banaszczyk, S. (2016). Digital standpoints: Debating gendered violence and racial exclusions in the feminist counterpublic. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 40(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859916667731
- Kangere, M., Kemitare, J., & Michau, L. (2017). Hashtag activism: Popularizing feminist analysis of violence against women in the Horn, East and Southern Africa. Feminist Media Studies, 17(5), 899–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1350526
- Lobato, L. C., & Gonzalez, C. (2020). Embodying the Web, recoding gender: How feminists are shaping progressive politics in Latin America. First Monday. 25(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i5.10129
- Lumsden, K., & Morgan, H. M. (2018). Cyber-trolling as symbolic violence. In N. Lombard (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of gender and violence (p. 80). Routledge.
- Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
- Mathias, J. N. (2017, January 3). The real name fallacy. Coral by Vox Media. https://coralproject.net/blog/the-real-name-fallacy/
- McGee, R., & Pettit, J. (2020). Power, empowerment and social change. Routledge.
- Miller, V., VeneKlasen, L., Reilly, M., & Clark, C. (2006). Power: Concepts for revisioning power for justice, equality and peace. Just Associates.
- Nazneen, S., & Hickey, S. (2019). Beyond the inclusion-to-influence debate: The politics of negotiating gender equity. In S. Nazneen, S. Hickey, & E. Sifaki (Eds.), Negotiating gender equity in the Global South (pp. 3–20). Routledge.
- Noble, S. U. (2016). A future for intersectional black feminist technology studies. Scholar & Feminist Online, 13(3), 1–8.
- Office of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. General Assembly resolution 48/104. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-elimination-violence-against-women
- Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259190
- Pandey, P., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Unpacking Empowerment in ICT4D Research. In P. Nielsen & H. C. Kimaro (Eds.), Information and communication technologies for development. strengthening southern-driven cooperation as a catalyst for ICT4D (pp. 83–94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_8
- Pavan, E. (2017). Internet intermediaries and online gender-based violence. In M. Segrave & L. Vitis (Eds.), Gender, technology and violence (pp. 62–78). Routledge.
- Pei, X., & Chib, A. (2021). Beyond the gender (dis)empowerment dichotomy: The mobile phone as social catalyst for gender transformation in the Global South. New Media & Society, 23(3), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820905295
- Pinch, T. (2009). The social construction of technology (SCOT): The old, the new, and the nonhuman. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Material culture and technology in everyday life: Ethnographic approaches (pp. 45–58). Peter Lang.
- Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2017). Sexual violence in a digital age (pp. 49–76). Springer.
- Rao, A., & Sandler, J. (2019). Critical reflections on shifting the toxic alchemy of institutional power. In R. McGee & J. Pettit (Eds.), Power, empowerment and social change (pp. 139–151). Routledge.
- Resurrección, B. P., Doneys, P., & Lund, R. (2015). Gender entanglements in gender and development: A call for grounded, multidimensional and ‘moving’ feminisms. In R. Lund, P. Doneys, & B. Resurrección (Eds.), Gendered entanglements: Revisiting gender in rapidly changing Asia (pp.319–328). NIAS Press.
- Roberts, S. T. (2018). Digital detritus: “Error” and the logic of opacity in social media content moderation. First Monday. 23(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i3.8283
- Sey, A., & Hafkin, N. (2019). Taking stock: Data and evidence on gender equality in digital access, skills, and leadership. EQUALS Global Partnership. https://www.itu.int/en/action/gender-equality/Documents/EQUALS%20Research%20Report%202019.pdf
- Steinfield, C., Wyche, S., Cai, T., & Chiwasa, H. (2015). The mobile divide revisited: Mobile phone use by smallholder farmers in Malawi. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Vol. 8, p. 9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738022
- Suzor, N., Dragiewicz, M., Harris, B., Gillett, R., Burgess, J., & Van Geelen, T. (2019). Human rights by design: The responsibilities of social media platforms to address gender‐based violence online. Policy & Internet, 11(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.185
- Thakur, D., & Potter, L. (2018). Universal service and access funds: An untapped resource to close the gender digital divide. Web Foundation.
- The Glitch Team. (2019). Online abuse: Addressing new forms of control. Safe: The Domestic Abuse Quarterly, 66, 23–26.
- Tidy, J. (2019, October 25). Stalkerware: The software that spies on your partner—BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-50166147
- UN. (2015). Sustainable development goals [5]. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
- UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018, June 21). OHCHR | The impact of online violence defenders and women’s organisations. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23238&LangID=E
- United Nations Human Rights Council & Šimonović, D. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). Human Rights Council.
- United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Sub-Committee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security. (2021). (testimony of Frances Haugen). https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/d2a43b1f-9d3e-42b9-ac4a-9bb8d262ecb7/note/566e46ba-1a14-45cc-a5b6-fb5624f019b1.#page=1
- UN Women. (2020). Online and ICT facilitated violence against women and girls during COVID-19 (UN Women Ending Violence Against Women (EVAW) COVID-19 Briefs No. 4; UN Women Ending Violence Against Women (EVAW) COVID-19 Briefs, Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.18356/b3f5cc80-en
- UN Women & United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). Progress on the sustainable development goals. UN Women. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2021/Progress-on-the-Sustainable-Development-Goals-The-gender-snapshot-2021-en.pdf
- van der Spuy, A., & Aavriti, N. (2018). Mapping research in gender and digital technology (p. 144). Association of Progressive Communications. https://www.apc.org/sites/default/files/IDRC_Mapping_0323_0.pdf
- Van Dijck, J. (2021). Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2801–2819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820940293
- van Oosten, J. M. F. (2021). Adolescent girls’ use of social media for challenging sexualization. Gender, Technology and Development, 25(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2021.1880039
- Vella, H. (2018, June 20). IoT devices and smart domestic abuse: Who has the controls?. E&T Magazine. https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2018/06/iot-devices-and-smart-domestic-abuse-who-has-the-controls/
- Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057
- Williams, S. (2015). Digital defense: Black feminists resist violence with hashtag activism. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1008744
- Yardley, E. (2021). Technology-facilitated domestic abuse in political economy: A new theoretical framework. Violence against Women, 27(10), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220947172
- Zelezny-Green, R. (2018). ‘Now I want to use it to learn more’: Using mobile phones to further the educational rights of the girl child in Kenya. Gender & Development, 26(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2018.1473226
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.