617
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives/Commentaries

Knowledge economy and gender inequality

, &
Pages 341-356 | Received 22 Jan 2022, Accepted 16 Sep 2022, Published online: 22 Oct 2022

References

  • Altekar, A. S. (1952). The position of women in Hindu society: From pre-historic times to the present. Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Appadurai, A. (2013). Commodities and the politics of value. In The future as cultural fact (pp. 9–60). Verso.
  • Archer, W. G. (1974). The hill of flutes: Love, life and poetry in tribal India. George Allen and Unwin.
  • Bamberger, J. (1974). The myths of matriarchy. In M. Z. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society (pp. 281–300). Stanford University Press.
  • Bosu-Mullick, S. (2001). Gender relations and witches among the indigenous communities of jharkhand, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 5, 2.
  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clearlight Publishers.
  • Chakravarti, U. (1993). Conceptualising brahminical patriarchy in early India: Gender, caste, class and state. Economic and Political Weekly, 28, 579–585.
  • Chakravarti, U. (1999). The world of the Bhaktin in South Indian tradition – the body and beyond. In Kum Kum Roy (Ed.), Women in early Indian society (pp. 299–321). Manohar Books.
  • Chattopadhyaya, D. (1966). Science and society in ancient India. KP Bagchi.
  • Doniger, W. (2009). The hindus: An alternate history. Penguin/Viking Press.
  • Doniger, W. (2016). Reeeming the Kamasutra. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Folbre, N. (2020). The rise and decline of patriarchal systems: An intersectional political economy. London: Verso.
  • Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the oral and the written. Cambridge University Press.
  • Govindnathan, P. (2022). Acid violence in India [Ph.D. Dissertation] (mimeo). Denton, TX: Texas Woman's University.
  • Green, M. (2008). Making women’s medicine masculine: The rise of male authority in premodern gynaecology. Oxford University Press. https://www.academia.edu/34512001/Green_Conclusion_The_Medieval_Legacy_Medicine_of_for_and_by_Women_2008_proofs, last accessed July1, 2022.
  • Gurukkal, R. (1997). From clan and lineage to hereditary occupations and caste in early South India. In D. Nathan (Ed.), From tribe to caste. Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
  • Harrison, S. (1992). Ritual as intellectual property. Man, 27(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2804052
  • Jaiswal, S. (2016). The making of Brahminic hegemony: Studies in caste, gender and Vaisnava theology. Tulika Books.
  • Kautilya (n.d.). Arthashastra. Translated by Sharmasastry. http://103.5.132.213:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/448/1/B_Arthashastra_of_Chanakya_-_English.pdf
  • Kelkar, K., Shrestha, G., & Veena, N. (2002). IT industry and women’s agency: Explorations in Bangalore and Delhi, India. Gender Technology and Development, 6(1), 63–84.
  • Kelkar, G., & Sharma, A. (2021). Culture, capital, and witch hunts in Assam. Council for Social Development and Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung South Asia.
  • Kelkar, G., & Nathan, D. (2020). Witch hunts: Culture, patriarchy and structural transformation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kelkar, G., Mishra-Panda, S., Nathan, D., & Pattanayak, S. (2022). Knowledge and gender inequality: A study of Adivasi societies in Jharkhand and Odisha. Centurion University of Technology and Management (mimeo).
  • Kelly, L. (2015). Knowledge and power in pre-historic societies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuznets, S. (1965). Economic growth and structure (pp. 85–87). Norton.
  • Leach, E. (2004). Political systems of highland Burma. Berg.
  • Lerche, J., & Shah, A. (2018). Conjugated oppression within contemporary capitalism: Class, caste, tribe and agrarian change in India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(5–6), 927–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1463217
  • Leslie, J. (2016). The daily duties of women. In V. Ramaswamy (Ed.), Women and work in precolonial India: A reader (pp. 3–8). Sage.
  • Manu. (n.d.). The laws of Manu (W. Doniger & B. Smith, Trans. and Ed.). Penguin.
  • Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press.
  • Munshi, I. (2001). Women and forest: A study of the Warlis of Western India. Gender, Technology and Development, 5(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2001.11909998
  • Nathan, D., Silliman Bhattacharjee, S., Rahul, S., Kumar, P., Dahaghani, I., Singh, S., & Swaminathan, P. (2022). Reverse subsidies in global monopsony capitalism: Gender, labor and environmental injustice in garment production. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nathan, D. (2021). Knowledge and inequality: An exploration. Working Paper 17. SICS: University of the Witwatersrand.
  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common pool resources. University of Michigan Press.
  • Pagano, U. (2014). The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(6), 1409–1429. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu025
  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
  • Porodong, P. (2001). Bobolizan, forests and gender relations in Sabah, Malaysia. Gender, Technology and Development, 5(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2001.11909986
  • Ramaswamy, V. (2016a). Introduction. In V. Ramaswamy (Ed.), Women and work in precolonial India: A reader (pp. xvii–xxxv). Sage.
  • Ramaswamy, V. (2016b). Tracking economic transitions: Tamil women from tribe to caste and changing production roles. In V. Ramaswamy (Ed.), Women and work in precolonial India: A reader. Sage.
  • Ramaswamy, V. (Ed.). (2016c). Women and work in pre-colonial India. Sage Publications.
  • Renn, J. (2020). The evolution of knowledge: Rethinking science for the anthropocene. Princeton University Press.
  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
  • Roy, Kumkum (Ed.). (1999). Women in early Indian societies. Manohar.
  • Roy, K. (2010). The power of gender and the gender of power. Oxford University Press.
  • Roy, K. (2021). The challenge of democratization: Learning and teaching history in the twenty-first century. Kum Kum Roy, PDF.
  • Salve, M. (2008/1855). Mang Maharachya Dukhvisayi (About the grief of the Mangs and Mahars). www.dalitweb.org/?p=2047
  • Satyawadhana, C. (2001). Appropriation of women’s indigenous knowledge: The case of the matrilineal Lua in Northern Thailand. Gender, Technology and Development, 5(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2001.11909988
  • Scharfe, H. (2002). Education in ancient India. Brill.
  • Sen, A. (1995). Cooperative conflict model of household bargaining. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Subramanian, A. (2019). The caste of merit: Engineering education in India. Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.