Mirroring the bias: gender and artificial intelligence

References

• Allen, C., Varner, G., & Zinser, J. (2000). Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130050111428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altomonte, G. (2015). Affective labor in the post-fordist transformation. Public Seminar.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2020). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new JIM code. Social Forces, 98(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, H. (2016). I’d blush if I could’: Digital assistants, disembodied cyborgs and the problem of gender. Word and Text, A Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics, 6(01), 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 356(6334), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. (2018). Conversing with personal digital assistants: On gender and artificial intelligence. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 10(3), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v10i3.563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P., & Ribas, L. (2019). AI becomes her: Discussing gender and artificial intelligence. Technoetic Arts, 17(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00014_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila Dos Santos, E., Albahari, A., Díaz, S., & De Freitas, E. C. (2022). Science and Technology as Feminine’: Raising awareness about and reducing the gender gap in STEM careers. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(4), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1922272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny, J. (2020). What is an algorithm? How computers know what to do with data. The Conversation.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrosovestnova, A., Hannibal, G., & Reinboth, T. (2022). Service robots for affective labor: a sociology of labor perspective. AI & Society, 37(2), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01208-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, L. (2021). Algorithms. Investopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Draude, C. (2011). Intermediaries: Reflections on virtual humans, gender, and the Uncanny Valley. AI & Society, 26(4), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0312-4
   Google Scholar
• Eyssel, F., & Hegel, F. (2012). (S)he’s got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. R. A. Focus. (2018). BigData: Discrimination in data-supported decision making. European Union Agency Fundamental Rights, Vienna, Austria, Rep. TK-02-18-634-EN-N.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler, L. (2017). We tested bots like Siri and Alexa to see who would stand up to sexual harassment. Quartz Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell, A. R. (2021). Artificial Eye: The Modernist Origins of AI's Gender Problem. Discourse, 43(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.13110/discourse.43.1.0031
   Google Scholar
• Fung, P. (2019). This is why AI has a gender problem. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/06/this-is-why-ai-has-a-gender-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Gilli, A., Pellegrino, M., & Kelly, R. (2019). Intelligent machines and the growing importance of ethics. In A. Gilli (Ed.), The brain and the processor: Unpacking the challenges of human-machine interaction (6th ed., pp. 45-54). NATO Defense College. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep19966.1
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., & Andrijasevic, R. (2019). Virtually absent: The gendered histories and economic of digital labour. Feminist Review, 123(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919878929
   Google Scholar
• Guszcza, J. (2018). Smarter together: Why artificial intelligence needs human-centered design. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-22/artificial-intelligence-human-centric-design.html
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. (1999). Affective labor. Boundary, 26(2), 89–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/303793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Cloud Education. (2020). Strong AI. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/strong-ai
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, C. (2017). Petitions asks Alexa and Siri to flip the script on sexual harrassment. Venture Beat. https://venturebeat.com/2017/12/08/petition-asks-siri-and-alexa-to-flip-the-script-on-sexual-harassment/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (2010). Sorting out the Question of Feminist Technology. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamola, M. J. (2021). An ontic–ontological theory for ethics of designing social robots: a case of Black African women and humanoids. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09529-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthiou, A., Klaus, P., Kuppelwieser, V. G., & Reeves, W. (2021). Man vs machine: Examining the three themes of service robotics in tourism and hospitality. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00434-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendrick, J. (2021b). AI adoption skyrocketed over the last 18 months. Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Naivinit, S., & Onta, N. (2006). Women into computing conference: The gender politics of ICT. Gender, Technology and Development, 10(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185240601000207
   Google Scholar
• Nomura, T. (2020). A possibility of inappropriate use of gender studies in human-robot Interaction. AI & Society, 35(3), 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00913-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science (New York, N.Y.), 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksala, J. (2016). Affective labor and feminist politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1086/682920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onta, N. (2007). Recent books on gender and technology. Gender, Technology and Development, 11(3), 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185240701100306
   Google Scholar
• Pagallo, U. (2013). Robots in the cloud with privacy: A new threat to data protection? Computer Law and Security Review, 29(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riek, L., & Howard, D. (2014). A code of ethics for the human–robot interaction profession. Proceedings of We Robot, 2014. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757805
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2010). Gendering humanoid robots: Robo-sexism in Japan. Body and Society, 16(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X10364767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelhowe, H. (2004). Paradigms of computing science: The necessity for methodological diversity. Gender, Technology and Development, 8(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2004.11910131
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, A., & McMahon, J. (2019). Alexa, alert me when the revolution comes: Gender, affect, and labor in the age of home-based artificial intelligence. New Political Science, 41(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2019.1595288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søraa, R. A. (2017). Mechanical genders: how do humans gender robots? Gender Technology and Development, 21(1-2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2017.1385320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutko, D. M. (2020). Theorizing femininity in artificial intelligence: a framework for undoing technology’s gender troubles. Cultural Studies, 34(4), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2019.1671469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2019). First UNESCO recommendations to combat gender bias in applications using artificial intelligence. Retrieved November 27, 2021, from https://en.unesco.org/news/first-unesco-recommendations-combat-gender-bias-applications-using-artificial-intelligence
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2020). Artificial intelligence and gender equality. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374174
   Google Scholar
• Vailshery, L. S. (2021). Number of digital voice assistants in use worldwide from 2019 to 2024. Statistica. https://www.statista.com/statistics/973815/worldwide-digital-voice-assistant-in-use/
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J., & Bath, C. (2007). ‘Social’ robots & ‘Emotional’ software agents: gendering processes and de-gendering strategies for ‘technologies in the making’. In Gender Designs IT (pp. 53–63). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90295-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018). Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum Boston Consulting Group (BCG). (2018). Towards a reskilling revolution: A future of jobs for all. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, K. (2018). The future of AI may be female, but it isn’t feminist. Venture Beat. https://venturebeat.com/2018/06/28/the-future-of-ai-may-be-female-but-it-isnt-feminist/
   Google Scholar