Advanced search
Publication Cover
Gender, Technology and Development Volume 26, 2022 - Issue 3: 25th Anniversary of GTD
Submit an article Journal homepage
4,631
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical papers

Intersectional representation in online media discourse: reflecting anti-discrimination position in reporting on same-sex partnerships

Rok Smrdelja Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, SloveniaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-2775View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Mojca Pajnikb Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia;c Peace Institute, Ljubljana, SloveniaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-1559View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 463-484 | Received 17 Nov 2021, Accepted 31 Oct 2022, Published online: 30 Nov 2022

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
  • Anthias, F. (2013). Hierarchies of social location, class and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame. International Sociology, 28(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912463155
  • Anthias, F. (2020). Translocational belongings: Intersectional dilemmas and social inequalities. Routledge.
  • Aruguete, N. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicación y Sociedad, 28(28), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i28.2929
  • Bowleg, L. (2008). When black+lesbian+woman ≠ black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z
  • Burke, M. C., & Bernstein, M. (2014). How the right usurped the queer agenda: Frame co-optation in political discourse. Sociological Forum, 29(4), 830–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12122
  • Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
  • Corrales, J. (2020). The expansion of LGBT rights in Latin America and the Backlash. In M. J. Bosia, S.M. McEvoy, & M. Rahman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of global LGBT and sexual diversity politics (pp. 185–200). Oxford University Press.
  • Costanza-Chock, S. (2018). Media, communication, and intersectional analysis: Ten comments for the International Panel on Social Progress. Global Media and Communication, 14(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766518776695
  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. Feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139, 139–142.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  • Davis, K. (2020). Who owns intersectionality? Some reflections on feminist debates on how theories travel. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 27(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506819892659
  • Dean, J. J. (2010). Thinking intersectionality: Sexualities and the politics of multiple identities. In Y. Taylor, S. Hines, & M.E. Casey (Eds.), Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality (pp. 119–139). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman Group.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  • Gopaldas, A., & DeRoy, G. (2015). An intersectional approach to diversity research. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(4), 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1019872
  • Gouma, A., & Dorer, J. (2019). Researching intersectionality in media studies: Theoretical approaches, methods and applications in communication and media research practice. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 15(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00005_1
  • Hull, K. (2001). The political limits of the rights frame: The case of same-sex marriage in Hawaii. Sociological Perspectives, 44(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389611
  • Jibrin, R., & Salem, S. (2015). Revisiting intersectionality: Reflections on theory and praxis. Trans-Scripts, 5, 7–24.
  • Krzyzanowski, M., & Machin, D. (2017). Critical approaches: Media analysis in/and critical discourse studies. In C. Colter & D. Perrin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of language and media (pp. 62–76). Routledge.
  • Kuhar, R. (2011). Resisting change: Same-sex partnership policy debates in Croatia and Slovenia. Südosteuropa: Zeitschrift Für Gegenwartsforschung, 59(1), 25–49.
  • Kuhar, R. (2017). Changing gender several times a day: The anti-gender movement in Slovenia. In R. Kuhar & D. Paternotte (eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: mobilizing against equality. (pp. 215–232). Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Kuhar, R., & Pajnik, M. (2020). Populist mobilizations in re-traditionalized society: Anti-gender campaigning in Slovenia. In G. Dietze & J. Roth (Eds.), Right-wing populism and gender: European perspectives and beyond (pp. 167–184). Transcript.
  • Lünenborg, M., & Fürsich, E. (2014). Media and the intersectional other: The complex negotiation of migration, gender, and class on German television. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.882857
  • Meyers, M. (2013). African American women in the news: Gender, race and class in journalism. Routledge.
  • Mihelj, S. (2004). The role of mass media in the (re)constitution of nations: the (re)constitution of the Slovenian Nation through the mass media representations of the plebiscite for an independent Slovenia, Bosnian refugees and non registered migration (1990–2001) [Doctoral dissertation]. Institutum Studiorum Humanitatis.
  • Molina, I., & Cacho, L. M. (2014). Historically mapping contemporary intersectional feminist media studies. In C. Carter, L. Steiner, & L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media and gender (pp. 71–80). Routledge.
  • Moss, K. (2017). Russia as the saviour of European civilization: Gender and the geopolitics of traditional values. In R. Kuhar & D. Paternotte (Eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality (pp. 195–214). Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Nölke, A. (2018). Making diversity conform? An intersectional, longitudinal analysis of LGBT-specific mainstream media advertisements. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(2), 224–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1314163
  • Pajnik, M. (2007). Medijske podobe o beguncih. Socialno delo, 46(1/2), 1–11.
  • Pajnik, M. (2019). Media populism on the example of right-wing political parties’ communication in Slovenia. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1540275
  • Pajnik, M., Kuhar, R., & Šori, I. (2016). Populism in the Slovenian context: Between ethno-nationalism and re-traditionalisation. In G. Campani, G. Lazaridis, & A. Benveniste (Eds.), The rise of the far right in Europe: Populist shifts and ‘othering' (pp. 137–160). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Paternotte, D., & Kuhar, R. (2017). "Gender ideology” in movement: Introduction. In R. Kuhar & D. Paternotte (Eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality (pp. 1–22). Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Paternotte, D., & Kuhar, R. (2018). Disentangling and locating the “Global Right”: Anti-gender campaigns in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1557
  • Podreka, J., Smrdelj, R., & Kuhar, R. (2019). Acceptance with reservations: LGBT people in Slovenia. In P. Godzisz & G. Viggiani (Eds.), Awareness of anti-LGBT hate crime in the European union (pp. 180–197). Lambda Warsaw.
  • Rajgelj, B. (ed.) (2015). Pravni položaj istospolnih partnerstev in starševstva v Sloveniji: sistemska analiza ureditve pravnega položaja istospolnih partnerstev in starševstva v slovenski zakonodaji. Zavod za kulturo raznolikosti Open.
  • Slootmaeckers, K. (2017). The litmus test of pride: Analysing the emergence of the Belgrade ‘ghost’ pride in the context of EU accession. East European Politics, 33(4), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1367290
  • Smith, B. (2016). Intersectional discrimination and substantive equality: A comparative and theoretical perspective. The Equal Rights Review, 16, 73–102.
  • Smooth, W. (2013). Intersectionality from Theoretical Framework to Policy Intervention. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Situating intersectionality (pp. 11–41). Palgrave.
  • Stern, D. M. (2012). It takes a classless, heteronormative utopian village: Gilmore girls and the problem of postfeminism. The Communication Review, 15(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2012.702005
  • Tandoc, E. C., Jr., & Duffy, A. (2019). Routines in journalism. In Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.870
  • Verloo, M. (2006). Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753
  • Vezjak, B. (2018). Seksizem in mizoginija skozi psevdoznanstveni diskurz: medijski konteksti obravnave “napačnega spola”. Javnost – The Public, 25(sup1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1554314
  • Wadsworth, N. D. (2011). Intersectionality in California’s same-sex marriage battles: A complex proposition. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910376386
  • Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5
  • Yuval Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Sage.
  • Zollmann, F., Klaehn, J., Sikka, T., Comeforo, K., Broudy, D., Tröger, M., Poole, E., Edgley, A., & Mullen, A. (2018). The propaganda model and intersectionality: Integrating separate paradigms. Media Theory, 2(2), 213–239.

Sources

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.