1,464
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives/Commentaries

Breaking through the silicon wall: gendered opportunities and risks of new technologies

ORCID Icon &
Pages 306-324 | Received 10 Nov 2021, Accepted 03 Nov 2022, Published online: 02 Dec 2022

References

  • Abd Wahab, R. I. (2022). Being Female in Male-Dominated Industries: Levelling the Playing Field. Data and Storage ASEAN. https://datastorageasean.com/expert-opinions-opinion-byline/being-female-male-dominated-industries-levelling-playing-field
  • Abdel-Aal, A. (2020). Distance Learning for Arab Women Empowerment. AMCIS 2020 Proceedings
  • Babic, A., & Hansez, I. (2021). The Glass Ceiling for Women Managers: Antecedents and Consequences for Work-Family Interface and Well-Being at Work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 618250–618217. p.1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250
  • Beaudry, C., Mouton, J., & Prozesky, H. (2018). The Next Generation of Scientists in Africa. In The Next Generation of Scientists in Africa. African Minds. https://doi.org/10.47622/978-1-928331-93-3
  • Berlin, G., Darino, L., Greenfield, M., & Starikova, I. (2019, June 7). Women in the healthcare industry. Health Systems and Services, McKinsey & Co. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/women-in-the-healthcare-industry
  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4 October), 369–386.
  • Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016). Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings [Paper presentation].30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016), Nips, 1–9.
  • Bonder, G. (2015). National Assessments in Gender and STI: Argentina Report. Women in Global Science and Technology (WISAT).
  • Bonham, K. S., & Stefan, M. I. (2017). Women are underrepresented in computational biology: An analysis of the scholarly literature in biology, computer science and computational biology. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(10), e1005134–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005134
  • Borgonovi, F., Centurelli, R., Dernis, H., Grundke, R., Horvát, P., Jamet, S., Keese, M., Liebender, A.-S., Marcolin, L., Rosenfeld, D., & Squicciarini, M. (2018). Bridging the Digital Gender Divide. Online Publication, 1–151. https://www.google.com/search?q=organisation+for+economic+co-operation+and+development+(oecd)+countries&rlz=1C1GCEU_enZA825ZA825&oq=Organisation+for+Economic+Co-operation+and+Development+&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0l4j46j0l2.16632j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
  • Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–15.
  • Burrell, J. (2010). Evaluating Shared Access: social equality and the circulation of mobile phones in rural Uganda. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01518.x
  • Campion, P., & Shrum, W. (2004). Gender and Science in Development: Women Scientists in Ghana, Kenya, India. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 28(4), 459–485.
  • Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM Pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM Pipeline Metaphor Serving Our Students and the STEM Workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21108
  • Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2020). LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations. ILR Review, 73(1), 25–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919843508
  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of womens underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108
  • Cirillo, D., Catuara-Solarz, S., Morey, C., Guney, E., Subirats, L., Mellino, S., Gigante, A., Valencia, A., Rementeria, M. J., Chadha, A. S., & Mavridis, N. (2020). Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0288-5
  • Copeland, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence. Encylopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence
  • Deloitte Global Center for Corporate Governance (2019). Women in the Boardroom: A Global Perspective
  • Deribe, K. K. (2020). ICT and challenges of agricultural extension education. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 12(3), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.5897/jaerd2020.1162
  • de, C., & Paolo, S. (2022, April 26). Rede Mãe Paulistana. https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/saude/programas/mae_paulistana/index.php?p=5657
  • Dubai School of Government (2011). The Role of Social Media in Arab Women’s Empowerment. (Arab Social Media Report).
  • Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785
  • Flor, L. S., Friedman, J., Spencer, C. N., Cagney, J., Arrieta, A., Herbert, M. E., Stein, C., Mullany, E. C., Hon, J., Patwardhan, V., Barber, R. M., Collins, J. K., Hay, S. I., Lim, S. S., Lozano, R., Mokdad, A. H., Murray, C. J. L., Reiner, R. C., Sorensen, R. J. D., … Gakidou, E. (2022). Quantifying the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender equality on health, social, and economic indicators: a comprehensive review of data from March, 2020, to September, 2021. The Lancet, 399(10344), 2381–2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00008-3
  • Ford, H., & Wajcman, J. (2017). ‘Anyone can edit’ not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap. Social Studies of Science, 47(4), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717692172
  • Gender Working Group. (1995). Taking action: Conclusions and recommendations of the Gender Working Group. In Gender Working Group of the United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development (Ed.), Missing links: Gender equity in science and technology for development (pp. 1–25). IDRC.
  • Google (2022). Google Diversity Annual Report. CA.
  • Graham, M., de Sabbata, S., & Zook, M. A. (2015). Towards a study of information geographies: (im)mutable augmentations and a mapping of the geographies of information. Geo: Geography and Environment, 2(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.8
  • GSMA, & Cherie Blair Foundation. (2010). Women and mobile: A global opportunity. http://www.cherieblairfoundation.org/uploads/pdf/women_and_mobile_a_global_opportunity.pdf
  • GSMA (2022). Early Warning Systems in the Philippines: Building Resilience through Mobile and Digital Technologies. GSMA.
  • GSMA Connected Women (2021). The mobile gender gap report 2021. GSMA.
  • GSMA Connected Women. (2018). The Gender Analysis and Identification Toolkit (GAIT). GSMA.
  • Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2014). Gender Equality in the Information Society: A Review of Current Literature and Recommendations for Policy and Practice. UK Department for International Development.
  • Hassan, B., Unwin, T., & Gardezi, A. (2017). Understanding the darker side of ICTs: Gender, sexual harassment, and mobile devices in Pakistan. Information Technologies & International Development, 14(2018), 1–17. http://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/1558/585
  • Hassan, R. M., & Shoukry, A. (2008). Clouds in Egypt’s Sky - Sexual Harassment: from Verbal Harassment to Rape. https://www.endvawnow.org/uploads/browser/files/ecrw_sexual_harassment_study_english.pdf.pdf
  • Huyer, S. (2015). Is the gender gap narrowing in science and engineering? (UNESCO Science Report. 84–103). UNESCO. p. 85
  • Huyer, S. (2019a). A Global Perspective on Women in Information Technology: Perspectives from The UNESCO Science Report 2015 Towards 2030. In C. Frieze & J. Quesenberry (Eds.), Cracking the Digital Ceiling: Women in Computing Around the World. Cambridge University Press. 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609081
  • Huyer, S. (2019b). ICT in a Changing Climate: A Path to Gender-Transformative Food Security. In A. Sey & N. Hafkin (Eds.), Taking Stock: Data and Evidence on Gender Digital Equality. United Nations University. 262–271. https://i.unu.edu/media/cs.unu.edu/attachment/4040/EQUALS-Research-Report-2019.pdf
  • IBM Cloud Education (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI). IBM Cloud Learn Hub, June 3. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/what-is-artificial-intelligence
  • Jha, P., Kesler, M. A., Kumar, R., Ram, F., Banthia, U. R., Aleksandrowicz, L., Bassani, D. G., Chandra, S., & Banthia, J. (2011). Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. The Lancet, 377(9781), 1921–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60649-1
  • Jin, J.-M., Bai, P., He, W., Wu, F., Liu, X.-F., Han, D.-M., Liu, S., & Yang, J.-K. (2020). Gender Differences in Patients With COVID-19: Focus on Severity and Mortality. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152
  • Kam, M. (2013). Cross-Regional Experiences from India: Mobiles for Empowering Women & Girls. UNESCO Regional Consultation Workshop
  • Kietzmann, J., Lee, L. W., McCarthy, I. P., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2020). Deepfakes: Trick or treat? Business Horizons, 63(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006
  • Koning, R., Samila, S., & Ferguson, J. P. (2021). Who do we invent for? Patents by women focus more on women’s health, but few women get to invent. Science (New York, N.Y.), 372(6548), 1345–1348.
  • Krell, N. T., Giroux, S. A., Guido, Z., Hannah, C., Lopus, S. E., Caylor, K. K., & Evans, T. P. (2021). Smallholder farmers’ use of mobile phone services in central Kenya. Climate and Development, 13(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1748847
  • Kunda, S. N., Jordaan, M., & Mennega, N. (2022). A South African Case Study of Women in the Information Technology Sector: Challenges and Recommendations. Organizational Cultures: An International Journal, 22(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-8013/CGP/v22i02/27-40
  • Lagesen, V. A. (2008). A cyber feminist utopia? Perceptions of gender and computer science among Malaysian women computer science students and faculty. Science, Technology and Human Values, 33(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306192
  • Latonero, M., Berhane, G., Hernandez, A., Mohebi, T., & Movius, L. (2011). Human trafficking online the role of social networking sites and online classifieds. Center on Communication Leadership & Policy (Issue September). http://technologyandtrafficking.usc.edu/files/2011/09/HumanTrafficking_FINAL.pdf
  • Lipsmeier, F., Taylor, K. I., Kilchenmann, T., Wolf, D., Scotland, A., Schjodt-Eriksen, J., Cheng, W.-Y., Fernandez-Garcia, I., Siebourg-Polster, J., Jin, L., Soto, J., Verselis, L., Boess, F., Koller, M., Grundman, M., Monsch, A. U., Postuma, R. B., Ghosh, A., Kremer, T., … Lindemann, M. (2018). Evaluation of smartphone-based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson’s disease clinical trial. Movement Disorders : official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 33(8), 1287–1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27376
  • Logan, D. E., Breazeal, C., Goodwin, M. S., Jeong, S., O’Connell, B., Smith-Freedman, D., Heathers, J., & Weinstock, P. (2019). Social Robots for Hospitalized Children. Pediatrics, 144(1), e20181511. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1511
  • Mahalingam, G., Ricanek, K., & Albert, A. M. (2014). Investigating the periocular-based face recognition across gender transformation. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 9(12), 2180–2192. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2014.2361479
  • Mahdi, E., Mahdi, A., & Buskens, A. (2014). Ancient culture and new technology: ICT and a future free from FGM/C for girls in Sudan. In I. Buskens & A. Webb (Eds.), Women and ICT in Africa and the Middle East, 208–226. IDRC.
  • Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Malcom, L. E. M., & Malcom, S. M. M. (2011). The Double Bind: The Next Generation. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 162–172. p11. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.a84201x508406327
  • Márquez, E. J., Trowbridge, J., Kuchel, G. A., Banchereau, J., & Ucar, D. (2020). The lethal sex gap: COVID-19. Immunity and Ageing, 17(1), 1–8. wr
  • Matoba, N., Akiyama, M., Ishigaki, K., Kanai, M., Takahashi, A., Momozawa, Y., Ikegawa, S., Ikeda, M., Iwata, N., Hirata, M., Matsuda, K., Kubo, M., Okada, Y., & Kamatani, Y. (2019). GWAS of smoking behaviour in 165,436 Japanese people reveals seven new loci and shared genetic architecture. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(5), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0557-y
  • McGregor, A. J. (2017). The Effects of Sex and Gender on Pharmacologic Toxicity: Implications for Clinical Therapy. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(1), 8–9. p8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.12.007
  • Microsoft (2021). Global Diversity & Inclusion Report.
  • Miller, I. N., & Cronin-Golomb, A. (2010). Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease: Clinical characteristics and cognition. Movement Disorders, 25(16), 2695–2703. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23388
  • Mittal, S. (2016). Role of Mobile Phone-enabled Climate Information Services in Gender-inclusive Agriculture. Gender, Technology and Development, 20(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852416639772
  • Mlambo-Ngcuka, P. (2017, July 14). Reshaping the future: Women, girls, ICTs and the SDGs. UN Women.
  • Mpiima, D. M., Manyire, H., Kabonesa, C., & Espiling, M. (2019). Crop Production, Gender Roles and the Use of Mobile Phones and Radios for Agricultural Information by Farmers in Apac District, Northern Uganda. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 07(03), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73007
  • Ndiaye, O. K. (2013). Is the success of M-Pesa empowering Kenyan rural women? Feminist Africa, 18, 156–161.
  • Neumayer, E., & Plumper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: the impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00563.x
  • Ngila, D., Boshoff, N., Henry, F., Diab, R., Malcom, S., & Thomson, J. (2017). Women’s representation in national science academies: An unsettling narrative. South African Journal of Science, 113(5/6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20170050
  • Ni Loideain, N., & Rachel, A. (2018). From Alexa to Siri and the GDPR: The Gendering of Virtual Personal Assistants and the Role of EU Data Protection Law. King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 26.pp. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3281807
  • Nielsen, M. W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A. W., & Schiebinger, L. (2017). Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(8), 1740–1742. p. 1740. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700616114
  • Nielsen, M. W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A. W., & Schiebinger, L. (2017). Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1740–1742. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703146114
  • Oxfam International (2020). Care in the time of coronavirus: Why care work needs to be at the centre of a post-COVID-19 feminist future. (Oxfam Briefing Report). Oxfam GB. https://doi.org/10.21201/2020.6232
  • Pant, A. P. (2003). Good practices: gender equality in basic education and lifelong learning through CLCs: experiences from 15 countries. UNESCO Asia and the Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
  • Perera, D., Agnihotri, J., Seidou, O., & Djalante, R. (2020). Identifying societal challenges in flood early warning systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101794
  • Petray, T., Doyle, T., Harrison, R., Howard, E., & Morgan, R. (2018). Re-Engineering the “Leaky Pipeline” Metaphor: Diversifying the Pool by Teaching STEM “by Stealth. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 11(1), 24–10.
  • Rajenderan, M., & Zawawi, D. (2019). Leaky Pipeline Syndrome in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Industry of Malaysia: A Conceptual Study on Female Career Barriers and Retention Management. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 1158–1174. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i2/5672
  • Riley, D., Pawley, A. L., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. D. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education: transformative possibilities. NWSA Journal, 21, 21–40.
  • Rotondi, V., Billari, F., Pesando, L. M., & Kashyap, R. (2019). Digital Rural Gender Divide in Latin America and the Caribbean. IICA. p. 5.
  • Sample, I. (2020). January 13). What are deepfakes—and how can you spot them? The Guardian
  • Sanga, C. 1., Magesa, M. M. 1., Chingonikaya, E. 1., & Kayunze, K. A. 1. (2013). Can e-learning promote participation of female students in STEM disciplines in higher learning institutions of Tanzania? International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 9(3), 86–102.
  • Schafer, M. J., Shrum, W. M., Miller, B. P., Mbatia, P. N., Palackal, A., & Dzorgbo, D. B. S. (2016). Access to ICT and research output of agriculture researchers in Kenya. Science, Technology and Society, 21(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721816640627
  • Schiebinger, L. (2014). Gendered innovations: harnessing the creative power of sex and gender analysis to discover new ideas and develop new technologies. Triple Helix, 1(1), 9. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0009-7
  • Sey, A., & Hafkin, N. (2019). Taking Stock: Data and Evidence on Gender Digital Equality. UNU.
  • Simonite, T. (2018, August 17). AI is the future—but where are the women. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/artificial-intelligence-researchers-gender-imbalance/
  • Snyder, J., Turner, L., & Crooks, V. A. (2018). Crowdfunding for Unproven Stem Cell–Based Interventions. JAMA, 319(18), 1935–1936. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.3057
  • Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science (New York, N.Y.), 354(6317), 1288–1292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309
  • Tanwir, M., & Khemka, N. (2018). Breaking the silicon ceiling: Gender equality and information technology in Pakistan. Gender, Technology and Development, 22(2), 109–129. p109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2018.1496695
  • UNCTAD (2014). Empowering Women Entrepreneurs through Information and Communications Technologies. UNCTAD.
  • UNCTAD (2019a). BORDERLINE: Women in informal cross-border trade in Malawi, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia. UNCTAD.
  • UNCTAD (2019b). The impact of rapid technological change on sustainable development. UNCTAD.
  • UNESCO (2017). Cracking the code: Girls and Women’s education in STEM. UNESCO.
  • UNESCO (2019a). I’d Blush if I Could. UNESCO.
  • UNESCO (2019b). Women in science. UNESCO.
  • UNESCO (2021). UNESCO Science Report: The race against time for smarter development. UNESCO.
  • UNESCO (2022). A Braided River: The Universe of Indian Women in Science. UNESCO.
  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) (2019). Information and Communication Technologies: Prospects for Promoting Gender Equality in the Arab Region. United Nations.
  • United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) (2020). World’s Women.
  • United Nations, Economic and Social Council Commission on Science and Technology for Development. (2021, March 4). Using science, technology and innovation to close the gap on Sustainable Development Goal 3, good health and well-being: Report of the Secretary-General. E/CN.16/2021/2.
  • Williams, L. D. A., & Artzberger, G. H. (2019). Developing women as ICT users: a miniature scoping review of gender and ICTs for development. Gender, Technology and Development, 23(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1679330
  • Williams, J. (2004). The Maternal Wall. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2004/10/the-maternal-wall
  • Wyche, S., & Olson, J. (2018). Kenyan Women’s Rural Realities, Mobile Internet Access, and “Africa Rising. Information Technologies & International Development, 14, 33–47.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.