References
- Abubakar, N. H., & Dasuki, S. I. (2018). Empowerment in their hands: Use of WhatsApp by women in Nigeria. Gender, Technology and Development, 22(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2018.1509490
- Alemany, C., Slatter, C., & Rodríguez Enríquez, C. (2019). Gender blindness and the annulment of the development contract. Development and Change, 50(2), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12486
- Alhayek, K. (2016). ICTs, agency, and gender in Syrian Activists’ Work among Syrian Refugees in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 20(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852416660649
- Chandra, G., & Erlingsdóttir, I. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of the #MeToo Movement. Routledge.
- Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
- Doneys, P., & Resurrección, B. P. (2022). Gendered pathways of democracy to sustainability. In H. K. Basil Bornemann (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of democracy and sustainability. Routledge.
- Dung, S. K., López, A., Barragan, E. L., Reyes, R. J., Thu, R., Castellanos, E., Catalan, F., Huerta-Sánchez, E., & Rohlfs, R. V. (2019). Illuminating women’s hidden contribution to historical theoretical population Genetics. Genetics, 211(2), 363–366. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301277
- Gaybor, J. (2019). Empowerment, destigmatization and sustainability: The co-construction of reusable menstrual technologies in the context of menstrual activism in Argentina. Gender, Technology and Development, 23(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1643522
- Homsy, G. C., & Lambright, K. T. (2021). Beyond community characteristics: A leader’s gender and local government adoption of energy conservation practices and redistributive programmes. Local Environment, 26(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1886068
- Hostettler, S., Hazboun, E., & Bolay, J.-C. (Eds.) (2015). Technologies for development: What is essential? Springer.
- Icaza, R., & Vázquez, R. (2016). The coloniality of gender as a radical critique of developmentalism. In The Palgrave handbook of gender and development (pp. 62–73). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kelkar, G. (1997). Editorial. Gender, Technology and Development, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.1997.11909838
- Kim, E., & Standal, K. (2019). Empowered by electricity? The political economy of gender and energy in rural Naryn. Gender, Technology and Development, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1596558
- Kusakabe, K., Doneys, P., & Chatterjee, J. S. (2017). Looking forward, looking back: Gender, Technology and Development in a changing world. Gender, Technology and Development, 21(1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2017.1407069
- Leach, M. (2016). Gender equality and sustainable development. Routledge.
- Lechman, E., & Popowska, M. (2020). Enhancing women’s engagement in economic activities through information and communication technology deployment: Evidence from Central–Eastern European countries. Gender, Technology and Development, 24(3), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2020.1824568
- Lykke, N. (1997). To Be a Cyborg or a goddess? Gender, Technology and Development, 1(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.1997.11909841
- MacGregor, S. (Ed.). (2017). Routledge handbook of gender and environment. Routledge.
- Mawdsley, E. (2020). Queering development? The unsettling geographies of South–South cooperation. Antipode, 52(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12574
- Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/302821
- Nightingale, A. J., Eriksen, S., Taylor, M., Forsyth, T., Pelling, M., Newsham, A., Boyd, E., Brown, K., Harvey, B., Jones, L., Bezner Kerr, R., Mehta, L., Naess, L. O., Ockwell, D., Scoones, I., Tanner, T., & Whitfield, S. (2020). Beyond Technical Fixes: Climate solutions and the great derangement. Climate and Development, 12(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495
- Resurreción, B. P., & Elmhirst, R. (Eds.) (2008). Gender and natural resource management: livelihoods, mobility and interventions. Routledge.
- Richardson, S. S., Reiches, M. W., Bruch, J., Boulicault, M., Noll, N. E., & Shattuck-Heidorn, H. (2020). Is there a gender-equality Paradox in science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018). Psychological Science, 31(3), 338–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619872762
- Ryan, J., & Nanda, S. (2022). COVID-19: Social inequalities and human possibilities. Routledge.
- Søraa, R. A. (2017). Mechanical genders: How do humans gender robots? Gender, Technology and Development, 21(1–2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2017.1385320
- Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The Gender-Equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
- Sweetman, C. (Ed.). (1988). Gender and technology. Oxfam GB.
- Truong, T. D. (1997). Gender and human development: A feminist perspective. Gender, Technology and Development, 1(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.1997.11909869
- UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO.
- Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Zimdars, M., & Mcleod, K. (Eds.) (2020). Fake news: Understanding media and misinformation in the digital age. The MIT Press.