Examining Teachers’ Value Perceptions According to Different Variables

References

• Aktay A, Eksi H 2009. Yonetici ve ogretmenlerin deger tercihleri ile orgutsel vatandaslik davranislari arasindaki iliski [The relationship between Organizational citizenship behaviours and value Preferences of teachers and principal]. Journal of Work Ethi, 2 (3): 19–65.
   Google Scholar
• Aktepe V, Yel S 2009. Ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin deger yargilarinin betimlenmesi: Kirsehir ili ornegi [Characterization of values of primary school Teachers: The case of Kirsehir]. Journal of Educational Science, 7 (3): 607–622.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan AE, Celebi N, Akdag B, Yuksel M, Canel N, Imamoglu S, Dundar S 2009. A study on professional ethic perceptions of teachers and school principals. European Journal of Educational Studies-A Peer Reviewed Online Journal, 1 (3): 145-167. ISSN 19446-6331.ozelacademy.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Bakioglu A, Silay N 2011. Yuksek Ogretimve Ogretmen Yetistirmede Karakter Egitimi [Higher Education and Character Education on Teacher Training]. Ankara: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Battle AA, Looney L 2014.Teachers’ intentions to stay in teaching.The role of values and knowledge of adolescent development. Education, 134 (3): 369–379.
   Google Scholar
• Bilsky W, Schwartz SH 1990.Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values. extensions and cross cultural replications. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 58: 878–891.
   Google Scholar
• Celik V 2014. Developing moral capital in schools. Education and Science, 39 (174): 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Liu Y 2011. Relationships between in-role performance and individual values, commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior among Israeli teachers. International Journal of Psychology, 46 (4): 2 71-287 .
   Google Scholar
• Collinson V 2012. Sources of teachers’ values and attitudes. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Values and Attitudes, 16 (3): 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock M 1990. Learning to Live: Values and Experience in the Life of a Classroom. From http://proquest.umi.com/pqdwebdid=747120221&sid=3&fmt=2&clientid=43845&rqt=309&vname=pqd. (Retrieved on 3 March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings R, Harlow S, Maddux CD 2007. Moral reasoning of in-service and Preservice teachers: A review of the research. Journal of Moral Education, 36 (1): 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• De Roche EF, Williams MM 1998. Educating Hearts and Minds. California: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Demirutku K 2004. Turkish Adaptation of the Portrait Value Questionnaire. Unpublished Manuscript. Ankara/ Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Demirutku K 2007. Parenting Styles, Internalization of Values, and the Self-concept. PhD Thesis, UnPublished. Ankara/Turkey: The Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Dundar HT 2012.The relationship between the Teachers’ values and their organizational citizenship Behaviors. Erzincan University. Journal of Education-Faculty, 14 (2): 216–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis CD 1994. Urban secondary teacher’ value orientations: Social goals for teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10 (1): 9–120.
   Google Scholar
• Eksi H 2003. Temel insani degerlerin kazandirilmasinda bir yaklasim: Karakter egitimi programlari [An approach of bringing basic humanistic values: Character education programs]. Journal of Values Education, 1 (1): 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Firat N 2007. Ogretmen ye Egitim Yoneticilerinin Deger ye Okul Kulturu Algilari [Value and School Culture Perception of Teacher and Educational Administration]. Doctorate Thesis, Unpublished. Izmir. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu.
   Google Scholar
• Firat-Sahin N, Acikgoz K 2012. Bazi degiskenler ayisindan ögretmenlerin deger sistemleri [Value Systems of teachers with different variables]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43: 422–443.
   Google Scholar
• Frydaki E, Mamoura M 2008. Explaining teachers’ value orientations in literature and history class-rooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (6): 1487–1501.
   Google Scholar
• Gultekin ML 1996. The Politics of Practice: An Analysis of One Teacher’s Values, Beliefs, and Theories. AAT.9627962.University of Pennsylvania. From. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdwebdid=742552891&sid=3&fmt=2&clientid=43845&rqt=309&vname=pqd. (Retrieved on 15 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gungor E 1993. Degerler Psikolojisi: Ahlak Psikolojisi, Ahlaki Degerlerve Ahlaki Gelisme [Value Psychology: Moral Psychology, Moral Values and Moral Development]. Amsterdam: Netherlands Association of Turkish Academics Foundation Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes N 2001.Being a School of Excellence: Values-Based Education.Oxford: Shire County Council Education Service. From http://livingvaluesEducation.com.(Retrieved on 23 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G 1983. Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In: JB Deregowski, S Dziurawiec, RC Annis (Eds.): Expiscations in Cross-cultural Psychology. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger, pp. 335-355.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G 1984.The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9 (3): 389–398.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G 1985. The interaction between national and organizational value systems. Journal of Management Studies, 22 (4): 347–357.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G 2001. Culture’s Consequences. Comparing, Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2“Edition. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson SF 1988. The Relationship between Teacher Values, School Climate Ratings, Background Information and Self-report Use of Teaching Methods. West Virginia University, AAT 8905115.
   Google Scholar
• Karakitapoglu AZ, Imamoglu EO 2002. Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 142: 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Karamustafaoglu O, Ozmen H 2004. Toplumumuzda ve ogretmen adaylari arasinda ogretmenlik meslegine verilen deger uzerine [On the value given to the teaching profession among the Preservice teachers and our society]. Journal of Values Education, 6: 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschanbaum H 1995. Enhance Values and Morality in Schools and Youth Settings. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kolac E, Karadag R 2012. Turkce ogretmeni Adaylarinin “deger” kavramina yukledikleri anlamlar ve deger siralamalari [Turkish teachers’ “value” Concept meanings and values they installed rankings]. Primary School Online, 11 (3): 762–777.
   Google Scholar
• Kozan MK, Ergin C 1999. The influence of intra-cultural value differences on conflict management practices. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10: 249–267.
   Google Scholar
• Kusdil ME, Kagitcibasi C 2000. Turk ogretmenlerinin deger yonelimleri ve Schwartz deger kurami [Value administration of Turkish teachers and Schwartz value theory]. Turkish Journal of Psyhology, 15 (45): 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Y 2002. Teacher Value as a Determinant of Class-room Climate. PhD Thesis, Unpublished. Louisville, Kentucky: USD. UMI Number 3038912.
   Google Scholar
• Maya I 2012. Retired Teachers’ Self-Values (A Sample from canakkale). 51h World Conference on Educational Sciences - WCES 2013. Elseiver. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116: 601–605.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Donald P, Gandz J 1991. Idendification of values in organizations: Concepts, controversies and research. Journal of Management, 24 (3): 217–236.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy J 2004. Person-Organization Values Congruence and the Work Commitment of High School Principals. Doctoral Dissertation, Unpublished. University of San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmedoglu AU 2006. Genylik, degerlerve din [Youth, values and religion]. In: Y Mehmedoglu, AU Mehmedoglu (Eds.): Kuresellesme Ahlakve Degerler [Globalization, Morality and Values]. Istanbul: Litera, pp. 251-319.
   Google Scholar
• MEB 2011. Milli Egitim Bakanliginin Teskilatve Görevleri HakkSinda [About the Organization and Functions of the Ministry of National Education]. Official Newspaper. Number: 28054. From http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/09/20110914-1.htm. (Retrieved on 10 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• MEB 2012. Istanbul IlMilli Egitim Mudurlugu Strateji Gelistirme Mudurlugu [Istanbul Provincial National Education Directorate of the Directorate of Strategy Development] 2011-2012 Istatistikverileri [2011-2012 Statistical datas]. From http://Istanbul.meb.gov.tr/upload/bolumler/strateji/istatistik/istatistikist2012.pdf. (Retrieved on 10 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Oguz E 2012.Views of Preservice teachers on values and value education. Educational Science: Theory and Practice, 12 (2): 1320–1325.
   Google Scholar
• Posner BZ, Munson M 1979. The importance of values in organizational behavior. Human Search Management, 18 (3): 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Posner BZ 1992. Person-organization values congruence: No support for individual differences as a moderating influence. Human Relations, 45 (4): 351–361.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach M 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan K1993. Mining the values in the curriculum: A look character education. Educational Leadership, 51 (3): 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• SagivL, Schwartz SH 1995. Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 69 (1): 437–448.
   Google Scholar
• Sagnak M 2004. Birey, orgut uyumu [Individual Organization compliance]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice,10(37): 72–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sagnak M 2005. Ilkogretim okullarinda gorevli yonetici ve ogretmenlerin orgutsel degerlere iliskin algSrlarSr [Employee administrator of primary schools and teacher’s organizational values concerning Perceptions]. Education and Science, 30 (136): 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Test in 20 Countries. In: MP Zanna (Ed.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, Volume 25, pp. 1-65. Fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08):60281-60286.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH 1994. Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values Journal of Social Issues, 50 (4): 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychologyan International Review, 48 (1): 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH 2006. Basic Human Values: Theory, Methods and Application. From http://www.yourmoralsorg/schwartz.2006.basic%20human%2ovalues. (Re-trieved on 10 October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH,Bardi A 2001. Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (3): 268–290.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Bardi A 2003. Value and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology, 29 (10): 1207–1220.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Bilsky W 1990. Toward a theory of Universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (5): 878–891.
   Google Scholar
• Schwardz SH, Caprara GV, Vecchione M 2010. Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31 (3): 421–452.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Huisman S 1995.Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58: 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Rubel T 2005. Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multi-method studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89: 1010–1028.
   Google Scholar
• Sezgin F 2006. Ilkogretim okulu ogretmenlerinin birey-orgut deger uyumuna iliskin algilari [Primary school teachers perceptions of organization values fit]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 48: 557–583.
   Google Scholar
• Silcock P, Duncan D 2001. Values acquisition and values education: Some proposals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 49 (3): 242–259.
   Google Scholar
• Sisman M 2002. Orgutler ye Kulturler [Organization and Cultures]. Ankara: PEGEMA.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PB, Schwartz SH 1997. Values. In: JW Berry; MH Segall, C Kagitcibasi (Eds.): Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 78-118.
   Google Scholar
• Suh BK, Traiger J 1999. Teaching values through Elementary social studies and literature curricula. Education, 119 (4): 723–727.
   Google Scholar
• Tasdan M 2010. Turkiye’deki resmi ve ozel ilkogretim okulu ogretmenlerinin bireysel degerleri ile okulun orgutsel degerleri arasindaki uyum duzeyi [The Turkish state and private elementary school teacher’s the level of compliance between individual values and school’s organizational values]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16 (1): 113–148.
   Google Scholar
• Tull A, Medrano CI 2008. Character values congruence and person-organization fit in student affairs: Compatibility between administrators and the Institutions that employ them. Journal of College and Character, 9 (3): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Tunca N, Saglam M 2013. Reliability and validity work conducted on a professional values scale Designed for elementary school teachers. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, E-Journal, EBAD-JESR, 3 (1): 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Ursery D 2002. Exploring Values, Rules and Principles. From http://www.stedwardsedu/ursery/values. (Re-trieved on 20 December 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver JB, Schmitt NW 1991. An exploratory Examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44 (2): 333–352.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz E 2009. Ogretmenlerin deger tercihlerinin bazi degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi [The study into teachers’ value perceptions in terms of various Variables]. Journal of Values Education, 7 (17): 109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Ylmaz E, Avsaroglu Deniz 2010. An investigation of teacher candidates’ value preferences. WCES 2010. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2: 4943–4948.
   Google Scholar
• Walker ME 1998. A Longitudinal Analysis of Teacher Values from 1973 to 1994: Implications for Schools Leaders. Implications for Schools Leaders. A Office of Graduate Studies of Texas University Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. UMI Company. Ann Arbor. M148103. Number: 9815859.
   Google Scholar