The Effect of Organizational Support on Organizational Commitment

References

• Allen DG, Shore ML, Griffeth RW 2003. The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29 (1): 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong M 1998. A Handbook of Personnel Management Practice. 6th Edition. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Armeli S, Eisenberger R, Fasola P, Lynech P 1998. Perceived organizational support and police Performance: The moderating influence of socioEmotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (2): 288–297.
   Google Scholar
• Angle HL, Perry JL 1981. An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Aselage J, Eisenberger R 2003. Perceived Organizational support and psychological contracts: A Theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (5): 491–509.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan M, Agiroglu-Bakir A 2014. Techers’ Opinions About Organizational Commitment In Their Schools. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies International Journal of Social Science, 25 (1): 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Atik S, Ustuner M 2014. Ilkogretim Okullarinin Orgut Tipi Ile Ogretmenlerin Orgutsel Bagliligi Arasindaki Iliski. Ahi Evran Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 15 (2): 133–154.
   Google Scholar
• Aube C, Rousseau V, Morin EM 2007. Perceived Organizational support and organizational commitment: The moderating effect of locus of control and work autonomy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22 (5): 479–495.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio BJ, Zhu W, Koh W, Bhatia P 2004. Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (8): 951–968.
   Google Scholar
• Balay R 1999. Organisational commitment factors of employees and results. Ankara University Educational Sciences Faculty Journal, 32 (1): 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Balci A 2003. Organisational Socialisation Theory, Strategy and Tactics. Ankara: Pegem.
   Google Scholar
• Balci A 2009. Research, Method, Technic and Principles in Social Sciences. Ankara: Pegem.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop JW, Scott DK, Burroughs SM 2000. Support commitment and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management, 26 (6): 1113–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman TS, Strasser S 1984. A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27 (1): 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Baugh SG, Roberts RM 1994. Professional and Organizational commitment among engineers: conflicting or complementing Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 41 (2): 108–114.
   Google Scholar
• Becker TE, Randal DM, Riegel CD 1995. The multi-dimensional view of commitment and theory of reasoned action: A comparative evaluation. Journal of Management, 21 (4): 617–638.
   Google Scholar
• Bozdemir Y, Yolcu H 2014. Okul Yoneticilerinin Orgutsel Adanmislik Duzeyleri Ile Problem Cozme Becerileri Arasindaki Iliski. Egitim Bilimleri Arastirmalari Dergisi, Uluslararasi E-Dergi, 4 (2): 287–311.
   Google Scholar
• Demircan Cakar N, Yildiz S 2009. Effects of Organisational justice on job satisfaction. Is perceived Organisational support an intervening variable Electronic Social Sciences Journal, 8 (28): 68–90.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SP, Leigh TW 1996. A new look at psychoLogical climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (4): 358–368.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Eisenberger R, Johnson KM, Sucharski IL, Aselage J 2009. Perceived Organizational support and extra-role performance: which leads to which The Journal of Social Psychology, 149 (1): 119–124.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung MFY, Law MCC 2008. Relationships of Organizational justice and organizational identification: the mediating effects of perceived organizational Support in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Business Re-view, 14 (2): 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher O 1994. The effects of exchange ideology on the relationship between perceived organizational support and job performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 134 (3): 407–408.
   Google Scholar
• Day C, Eliot B, Kington A 2005. Reform standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining Commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21: 563–577.
   Google Scholar
• Dee JR, Henkin AB, Singleton CA 2006. Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41 (6): 603–627.
   Google Scholar
• Demircan CN, Yildiz S 2009. Effect of organisational justice on job satisfaction. Electronic Social Sciences Journal, 8 (28): 68–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dewettinck K, Singh J, Buyens D 2003. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Reviewing the empowerment effects on critical work outcomes. Vler-ick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series, 29: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dornstein M, Matalon Y, 1998. A comparative Analysis of predictors of organizational commitment. A study of voluntary army personnel in Isreal. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 34 (2): 192–203.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham RB, Grube JA, Castenada MB 1994. Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79 (3): 370–380.
   Google Scholar
• Egriboyun E 2014. Ortaogretim Okullarinda Gorey Yapan Yonetici ve Ogretmenlerin Orgutsel Destek ve Orgutsel Bagliliklari Arasindaki Iliski. Gumushane Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 9: 24–52.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P 1997. Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychlogy, 82 (5): 812–820.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Managemenet Reviews, 71 (3): 500–507.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Fasolo P, DavIslamastro V 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1): 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Florence S, Vandenberghe C 2003. Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of Commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (3): 251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Fresko B, Kfir D, Nasser F 1997. Predicting teacher commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13 (4): 429–438.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Barnett T, Hester K, Relyea C 2003. A social identity perspective on the relationship between perceived organizational support and Organizational commitment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (6): 789–791.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Baron RA 2003. Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guest EA 1991. Human Resource Management. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman CM, Fuqua DR, Worley J 2006. A reliability generalization study on the survey of perceived Organizational support: the effects of mean age and number of items on score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (4): 631–642.
   Google Scholar
• Howes CJ, Cropanzano R, Grandey AA, Mohler CJ 2000. Who is supporting whom Quality team Effectiveness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Quality Management, 5 (2): 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison S 1997. A path model of perceived Organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12 (1): 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Iplik E, Iplik FN, Efeoglu IE 2014. Calisanlarin Orgutsel Destek Algilarinin Orgutsel Vatandaslik Davranisi Uzerindeki Etkisinde Orgutsel Ozdeslesmenin Rolu. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 6 (12): 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Jeongkoo Y, Thye SR 2002. A dual process model of organizational commitment. Work and Occupations, 29 (1): 97–124.
   Google Scholar
• Johlke MC, Stamper CL, Shoermaker ME 2002. Antecedents to boundary-spanner perceived Organizational support. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17 (2): 116–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Ogut A 2012. Analysis of the relationship between perceived organisational support and Organisational commitment. A practice in hotel businesses. Suleyman Demirel University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 17 (1): 387–401.
   Google Scholar
• Karasar N 2009. Scientific Research Method. 20th Edition. Ankara: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Karatas S, Gules H 2010. Relationship between Primary school teachers’ job satisfaction and Organisational commitment. Usak University Social Sciences Journal, 3 (2): 74–89.
   Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn RL, 1977. Organisations’ Social Psychology. Ankara: TODAIE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kose S, Gonulluoglu S 2010. A research for determining the effect of organisational support on organisatinal commitment. Dumlupinar University Social Sciences Journal, 27: 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kraimer ML, Wayne SJ 2004. An examination of Perceived organizational support as a multidimensional construct in the context of an expatriate assignment. Journal of Management, 30 (2): 209–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kursunoglu A, Bakay E, Tanriogen A 2010. Organisational commitment level of primary school Teachers. Pam ukkale University Education Faculty Journal, 28 (2): 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Arad S 1996. A power perspective of empowerment and work groups: Implications for Human resources management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 14: 205–251.
   Google Scholar
• Makanjee CR, Hartzer YF, Uys IL 2006. The effect of perceived organizational support on organizational commitment of diagnostic imaging radiographers. Radiography, 12 (2): 118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Zajac DM 1990. A review and meta-Analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and Consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108 (2): 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ 1991. A Treecomponent conceptualitazation of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1: 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Smith CA 1993. Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (4): 538–551.
   Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM 1982. Employeeorganization linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nartgun-Sezgin S, Kalay M 2014. Ogretmenlerin Orgutsel Destek, Orgutsel Ozdeslesme Ile Orgutsel Sinizm Duzeylerine Iliskin Gorusleri. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9 (2): 1361-1376.
   Google Scholar
• Nehmeh R 2009. SMC working paper. Swiss Management Center, 5: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Northcraft T, Neale H 1996. Organisation Behaviour. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver N 1990. Work rewards, work values and Organizational commitment in employee-owned firm: Evidence from the U.K. Human Relations, 43 (6): 513–526.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A 2010. Researching the relationship of Perceived organisational support with the teachers’ interpersonal self-sufficiency beliefs. GU, Gazi Education Faculty Journal, 30 (1): 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdevecioglu M 2003. A research for determining Relationships between perceived organisational support and organisational commitment. D.E.U. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 18 (2): 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Piercy NF, Cravens DW, Lane N, Vorhies DW 2006. Driving organizational citizenship behaviors and salesperson in-role behavior performance: The role of management control and perceived organizational support. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2): 244–262.
   Google Scholar
• Polatci S, Ardic K, Koc M 2014. Farkli Bir Bakis Acisindan Is Ve Yasam Doyumu Algilanan Orgutsel Destek Ve Orgutsel Bagliligin Etkileri. C.U. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 23 (1): 267–287.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R 2002. Perceived Organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4): 698–714.
   Google Scholar
• Selcuk G 2003. Effect of Organisational Support on Employees’ Behaviours Concerning Work. Master’s Thesis, Unpublished. Izmir: Dokuz Eylul University Social Sciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Selvitopu A, Sahin H 2013. Ortaogretim ogretmenlerinin Orgutsel Adalet Algilari ile Orgutsel Bagliliklari Arasindaki Iliski. Ahi Evran Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14 (2): 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Stamper CL, Johlke MC 2003. The impact of Perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work out-comes. Journal of Management, 29 (4): 569–588.
   Google Scholar
• Tayyah S, Tariq N 2001. Development of an Indigenous organizational commitment questionnaire. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, ProQuest Psychology Journals, 16: 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Topaloglu M, Koc H, Yavuz E 2008. Analysis of Teachers’ organisational commitment in terms of some basic factors. Kamu-Is, 9: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Troman G, Raggl A 2008. Primary teacher Commitment and the attractions of teaching. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 16 (1): 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Turunc O, Celik M 2010. Effect of the employees’ Perception of organisational support and work stress on organisational identification and job performance. Management and Economics, 17 (2): 183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ustuner M 2009. Organisational commitment scale for teachers: Validity and reliability. Inonu University Education Faculty Journal, 10 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, Sleebos E 2006. Organizational identification versus Organizational commitment: self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (5): 571–584.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne SC, Shore LM, Liden RC 1997. Perceived Organizational support and leadermember exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1): 82–111.
   Google Scholar