The Relationship between Prospective Teachers’ Love for Children and “Gender Roles and Some Demographic Qualities”

References

• Acisli S, Kolomuc A 2012. Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin meslege yonelik tutumlarinin incelenmesi [Study of the would-be class teachers’ attitude towards the profession]. Egitim ye Ogretim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 1 (2): 266–270.
   Google Scholar
• Antecol H, Eren O, Ozbeklik S 2012. The Effect of Teacher Gender on Student Achievement in Primary School. IZA-DiscussionPaper, No. 6453.
   Google Scholar
• Aries P 1973. Centuries of Childhood. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Avsar V 2008. Ogretmen Adaylarinin Mizah Tarzlari ye Cinsiyet Rolleri Iliskisi. [The Relationship Between Prospective Teachers’ Humor Styles and Gender Roles.] Master’s thesis, Unpublished. Istanbul: Marmara University.
   Google Scholar
• Baba HB 2007. Teacher Candidates as the Agents of Change for a More Gender Equal Society. Master’s thesis, Unpublished. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar HH, Ozen Y, Gulacti F 2009. Egitim fakultesi ogrencilerinin cinsiyet ve bransa gore akademik basariilari ile ogrenme stillerinin incelenmesi [An investigation on academic achivement and learning styles as to branches and gender from Faculty of education students], Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 42 (1): 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett MA, Sinisi CS 1990. The initial validation of a liking of children scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55: 161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Bem SL 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (2): 155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Buscaglia L 2010. Yasamak, Sevmek ye Ogrenmek [living Loving and Learning] Istanbul: Inkilap Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Can G 1989. Ogretmen Adaylarinin Ogrencilere Yonelik Tutumlari. [Preservice Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Students]. Eskisehir: Anadolu Universitesi Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Marianne EP, James EW 2010. Sex and science: How Professor gender perpetuates the Gender gap Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (3): 1101–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Chusmir HL, Koberg SC 1989. Gender identity and sex role conflict among working women and men. The Journal of Psychology, 122 (6): 567–575.
   Google Scholar
• Dee Thomas S 2007. Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42 (3): 528–554
   Google Scholar
• Demirtas HA 2002. Gender role stereotypes, androgyny and gender role orientations, Kadin/Woman, 3 (2): 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dockett S, Perry B 2010. What will my teacher be like Picture storybooks about starting school. Aus-tralasian journal of early childhood, 35 (3): 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dokmen ZY 1999. Bem cinsiyet rolu envanteri kadin-siilik ve erkeksilik olcekleri Turkce formunun psikometrik ozellikleri [Psychometric characteristics of feminine and masculine subscales of Turkish version of born sex role inventor]. Kriz Dergisi, 7 (1): 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dokmen ZY 2004. Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Sosyal Psikolojik Aciklamalar [Gender: Social Psychological Explanations], Istanbul: Sistem.
   Google Scholar
• Duyan V. Gelbal S 2008. Barnett cocuk sevme olcegini Turkceye uyarlama calismasi [The adaptation study of Barnett liking of children scale to Turkish]. Egitim ye Bilim Dergisi, 33: 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ergin M, Ozdas A 1999. Okul gozlemi ve uygulama calismalarinin ogretmen adaylari uzerindeki etkisi. [School observation and application studies on the effect of Preservice teachers]. AKU Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3: 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel JR, Wallen NE 1993. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Mcgraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gelbal S, Duyan V 2010. Ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin cocuk sevme durumlarini etkileyen degiskenlerin Incelenmesi. [Examination of variables affecting Primary school teachers’ state of liking of children]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi. 38: 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A 1996. Sociology, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gundogdu M, Ozer A 2011. Ergenlerde Cinsiyet Rolu, Problem Cozme ve Ogrenilmis Caresizlik Iliskisi [The relationship with gender role, problem-solving and learned helplessness adolescents]. XL Ulusal Psikolojik Danismanlik ye Rehberlik Kongresi Ege Universitesi, Izmir.
   Google Scholar
• Gunindi EA 1997. Cinsiyet Rollerine Riskin Beklenti, Tutum, Davranislar ye Esler Arasi Sorumluluk Paylasiimi (Kamuda Calisan Yonetici Kadinlar Ornegi) [Expectations, Attitudes, Behaviors and Allocation of Responsibility between Spouses: The Example of Female Managers in Public Sector]. PhD thesis, Unpublished, Ankara: Hacettepe University.
   Google Scholar
• Gungor AD 2001. The gender gap in Turkish Education-A regional approach. ODTU Gelisme Dergisi, 28 (3-4): 339–360.
   Google Scholar
• Inandi Y 2009. Kadin ogretmenlerin okul muduru olmalari onundeki engeller (Mersin Ili Ornegi-Turkiye [The barriers hindering female teachers from Becoming school principals (sample from Mersin Province-Turkey]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Re-search, 36: 161–178.
   Google Scholar
• Jersild A 1975. The teacher as psychologist. In: DA Read, SB Simon (Eds.): Humanistic Education Sourcebook, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kapikiran NA 2009. Ogretmen adaylarinin empatik egilim ve kendini ayarlama acisindan incelenmesi [The analysis of university students in terms of emphatic tendency and self-monitoring]. PAU Egitim Fak Dergisi, 26: 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Karasar N 2003. Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemi [Scientific Method of Research] Ankara: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Kavuncu AN 1987. Bem Cinsiyet Rolu Envanterini Turk Toplumuna Uyarlama Calismalari. [The Adjustment Study of Bem Sex Role Inventory to Turkish Culture]. Master’s thesis, Unpublished. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
   Google Scholar
• Kuru M, Uzun H 2008. Turkiye’de ogretmen Adaylarinin seciminde 1954 ornegi [The method for selecting teacher candidates in Turkey 1954]. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 28 (3): 207–232.
   Google Scholar
• Milli Egitim Temel Kanunu. From http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/htm1/88.html (Retrieved on 19 July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Oguzkan F 1988. Ogretmenligin uc Yonu [The Three Aspects of Teaching]. Ankara: Kadioglu Onur B 2005. Turkiye’de Cocuklugun Tarihi, [Childhood History in Turkey]. Ankara: Imge.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan B, Gundogdu AE 2011. Toplumsal cinsiyet baglamiinda Turkee’de atasozleri vedeyimler [Prov-erbs and idioms in the context of gender in Turkish]. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish, 6 (3): 1133–1147.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick H, Mantzicopoulos PM, Samarapungavan A, French BE 2008. Patterns of young childeren’s motivation for science and teacher-child Relationships. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76 (2): 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Pehlivan KB 2008. Ogretmen adaylarinin sosyokulturel ozellikleri ve ogretmenlik meslegine yonelik Tutumlari [Preservice teachers’ attitudes towards the profession and sociocultural characteristics]. Mersin University Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 4-2: 151–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sayilan F 2012. Toplumsal Cinsiyet ye Egitim [Gender and Education]. Istanbul: Dipnot Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Seferoglu SS 2005. A study on teaching competencies of teacher candidates. International Conference on Education (ICE05), National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Tan MG, Sahin O, Sever M, Bora A 2007. Cumhuriyerte Cocuktular [They Were Children in the Republic]. Istanbul: Bogazici Universitesi Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Tekisik HH 2010. Ogretmenin Egitim Sevdasi [Teacher’s Passion in Education]. Ankara: Cagdas Egitim Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Tongue IH 1960. Pestalozzi Cocuklar Koyu [Pestaloz-zi Children’s Village]. Ankara: Dogus.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF 2003. Egitimin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Acisindan Incelenmesi: Turkiye Raporu. Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Uzuntiryaki B, Geban O 2004. Ilkogretim duzeyi Ogretmen adaylarinin ogrenme stilleri tercihleri ile ein-siyetleri arasindaki iliski [The relationship between gender differences and learning style preferences of Preservice teachers at elementary level]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 26: 182–187.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz DV, Zeyneloglu S, Kocaoz S, Kisa S, Taskin L, Eroglu K 2009. Universite ogrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine iliskin gorusleri [Views on gender roles of university students].Uluslararasi Insan Bilimleri Dergisi. 6 (1): 775–790.
   Google Scholar