The Relationship between Social Entrepreneurship Characteristics and the Personal Innovativeness of Prospective Teachers

References

• Akyurek C, Sahin C 2013. Evaluation of Entrepreneurship skills of elementary teachers. EKEV Academic Journal, 17 (57): 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Atali L, Sertbas K 2013. A research on individual innovativeness levels of football referees (Kocaeli Region case). Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 15 (3): 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Austin JE, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J 2006. Social entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bacanak A, Ulkudur MA 2012. The opinions of Science and technology education teachers about Entrepreneurial skills and effects: A qualitative study. Paper presented in X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress in Nigde University, Nigde, June 27 to 30, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bayrak C, Terzi C 2004. Reflections of school Managers’ entrepreneurial characteristics on schools. Paper presented in XIII. National Educational Science Congress in Inonu University, Malatya, July 6 to 9, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar DM 2012. Adoption of web 2.0 tools and the individual innovativeness levels of instructors. Journal of Hasan Ali Yucel Education Faculty, 18 (2): 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, D 2004. How to Change the World. Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt R 2000. Entrepreneurs and role conscious. Journal of Business Ideas, 12: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt O, Alparslan M 2013. Entrepreneurial characteristicsand entrepreneurship training: Successful entrepreneurs and students opinions. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 8 (1): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Boru D 2006.Entrepreneurial Tendency: A Research on the Business Administration Students Studying At Marmara University. Istanbul: Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cansiz E 2007. Determining Entrepreneurship Properties of University Student: A Study about the Students of SuleymanDemirel University. Master Thesis, Unpublished. Isparta: Suleyman Demirel University.
   Google Scholar
• Carikci IH, Koyuncu 0 2010. A research on to Determine the relationship between the individualist-col-lectivist culture and entrepreneurial trends. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Social Science Institute, 2 (3): 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Celik K 2013. The relationship between individual innovativeness and self-efficacy levels of student teachers. International Journal of Scientific Re-search in Education, 6 (1): 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cetindamar D, Tutal E, Titiz S, Taluk S 2010. Agents of Social Transformation: Social Entrepreneurs. Paper presented in Social Entrepreneurship Conference in Sabanci University, 4th June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cuhadar C, Bulbul T, Ilgaz G 2013. Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and technopedagogical education competencies of Preservice teachers. Ilkogretim Online, 12 (3): 797 807.
   Google Scholar
• Daft RL 2005. The Leadership Experience, 3th Edition. Canada: Thomson South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker PF 1998. The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 76 (6): 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Eraslan L 2011. Entrepreneurship teaching at primary education curriculum (sample of life science lesson). The Journal of The Industrial Arts Education Faculty of Gazi University, 27: 82–94.
   Google Scholar
• Geisler E 1993. Middle managers as internal corporate entrepreneurs: An unfolding agenda, Interfaces, 23 (6): 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gur-Erdogan D, Zafer-Gunes D 2013. The releationship between individual innovatiness and change readiness conditions of students attending faculty of education. Procedia-Social and Behavior Sciences, 106: 3033–3040.
   Google Scholar
• Herron L 1992. Cultivating corporate entrepreneurs. Human Resource Planning, 15 (4): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hisrich RD, Peters MP, Shepherd DA 2005. entrepreneurship. 6th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Black JS, Porter LW 2005. Management. International Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kazancioglu IS, Candemir A 2010. Exploring the Synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation: Study in furniture sector of Izmir. In: Alev KatranlST (Ed.):SMEs and Entrepreneurship. Izmir: Izmir University of Economics Publication No. 038: 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kert SB, Tekdal M 2012. Comparison of individual innovativeness perception of students attending Different education faculties. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11 (4): 1150–1161.
   Google Scholar
• Kilicer K, Odabasi HF 2010. Individual innovativeness scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, Validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38: 150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kilicer K 2011. Individual Innovativeness Profiles of Prospective Teachers in Computer Education and Instructional Technology. Ph. D. Thesis, UnPublished. Eskisehir: Anadolu University.
   Google Scholar
• Konakli T, Gogus N 2013. Preservice teachers’ social entrepreneurship qualifications scale: validity and reliability study. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 33 (2): 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K 2006.Social Entrepreneurship.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MEB 2005. Introductory Booklet for Pt-5t1 Grade Programs. Ankara: National Education Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oktug Z, Ozden MS 2013. The formative role of Intrinsic motivation in the relationship between Individualism/collectivism and individual innovation trends. Eskisehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Science, 14 (2): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ozgur H 2013. Determine the relationship between innovativeness features and critical thinking dispositions of information technologies Preservice teachers in point of various variables. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9 (2): 409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Uras M 2000. Perceptions of high school teachers about morale, innovation, autonomy, adaptability and problem-solving competencies subscales of Organizational health. Pam ukkale University Journal of Education, 7: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Uzkurt C 2008. Innovation Management and Innovative Organizational Culture as Means of Value Creation in Marketing. Istanbul: Beta Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz O, Bayraktar DM 2014. Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational technologies and their individual innovativeness categories. Procedia-Social and Behavior Sciences, 116: 3458–3461.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz-Ozturk Z, Summak MS 2014. Investigation of primary school teachers individual innovativeness. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, Special Issue 1: 844–853.
   Google Scholar