The Relationship between Students’ Engagement Level and Their Attitudes Toward SchoolFootnote^*

* The summary of this study was presented at the 1st Eurasian Educational Research Congress Congress, held in Istanbul, Turkey, between 24-26 April, 2014.

References

• Alici D 2013. Okula yoneliktutumolcegi’ ningelistir-ilmesi: Guvenirlik ve gecerlik calismasi [Development of an attitude scale towards school: A study on reliability and validity], Education and Science, 38: 318–331.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin B 2010. Cocukveergenpsikolojisi [Child and Adolesence Psychology]. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Balci A 2005. Egitim terimleri sozlugu [Education Terminology Dictionary]. Ankara: Tek Agac Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Bomia L, Beluzo L, Demeester D, Elander K, Johnson M, Sheldon, B 1997. The Impact of Teaching Strategies on Intrinsic Motivation. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ED 418 925)
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA 2006. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buyukozturk S 2005. Sosyal Bilimler kin Veri Analizi [Data Analysis for Social Science]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman E 2003. Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates. Practical Assessment,Research and Evaluation, 8 (13). From http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8andn=13 (Retrieved on 7 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick R 2014. Learning to learn: A complex system perspective. In: R Deakin, Crick C Stringher, K Ren (Eds.): Learning to Learn: International Perspectives from Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 66-86.
   Google Scholar
• Englund MM, Luckner AE, Whaley GJL, Egeland B 2004. Children’s achievement in early elementary school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations, and quality of assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96: 723–730.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74: 59–109.
   Google Scholar
• Forehand MJ 2014. Working on the Work Framework for Engagement: Impacting Students’ Perceived Learning, Attitudes Toward School, and Achievement. PhD Thesis, Unpublished. Lynchburg: Liberty University
   Google Scholar
• Green SB, Salkind NJ 2008. Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh.- Analyzing and Understanding Data. 6th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar-Chiriac E 2014.Group Work as an Incentive for Learning-Students’ Experiences of Group Work. Front. Psychol. 5:558. From http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24926282 (Retrieved on 05 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Harboura KE, Lauren LE, Chris AS, Lindsay EH 2015. A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59 (1): 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Jablon JR, Wilkinson M 2006. Using engagement Strategies to facilitate children’s learning and success. Young Children, 61 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Karaman-Kepenekci Y, Nayir F 2014. Okul iklimini insan haklarina duyarlilik boyutundasorgulama: liseleruzerinebirarastirma [Querying of school climate in terms of sensitivity to human rights: A research on high schools]. Trakya University Journal of Education, 4: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kiroglu K 2013. Is my social studies teacher democratic? Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 50: 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh GD 2009.The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141: 5-12. From http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.283 (Retrieved on 9 May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lazaros EJ, Davidson CJ 2013. Improving student engagement. Contin J Arts Human, 5: 55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid A 2014. Student Engagement, Student Attitudes, and School Preparedness: A Study of Adolescents in Grade Nine, California State University, Long Beach, Dissertation Abstracts, From http://pqdtopen.pro-quest.com/results.html?keywords=student%20engagement (Retrieved on 1 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Marks HM 2000 . Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years, American Educational Research Journal, 37: 153-184.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann FM 1996. Authentic Achievement: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality. Pt Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand M, Gamoran A 1992. Instructional discourse and student engagement. In: Dale H Schunk, Judith L Meece (Eds.): Student Perceptions in the Classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 149-179.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdamar K 2004. Paket Program lar Ile Istatiksel Veri Analizi [Statistical Data Analysis With Pocket Programs]. Eskisehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Jong H, Carrell D, Jeon S, Barch J 2004. Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support, Motivation and Emotion, 28 (2): 147–169
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL 2009. Prooting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning and well-being. In: Kathryn R Wentzel, Allan Wigfield (Eds.): Handbook on Motivation at School. New York: Routlage, pp.171-196.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed S, Zyngier D 2012. How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1: 252–267.
   Google Scholar
• Schlechty PC 2001.0kulu Yeniden Kurmak [Shaking Up The Schools] (Trans. Ozden Y 2012). Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Schlechty PC 2002. Working on the Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Secer I 2013. SPSS ye LISREL Ile Pratik VeriAnalizi, [Practical Data Analysis with SPSS and LISREL], Ankara: AniYayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Senior C, Howard C 2014. Learning in Friendship Groups: Developing Students’ Conceptual Understanding through Social Interaction. Front Psychol, 5:1031. From http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01031/full (Retrieved on 5 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Senior C, Howard C, Senior R 2014. The Future and the Female Academic Leader: Advancing Student Engagement. Front Psychol, 5:377. From http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc4010763/ (Retrieved on 5 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair MF, Christenson SL, Lehr CA, Anderson AR 2003. Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from check and connect longitudinal studies. The California School Psychologist, 8: 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tatar M 2006. Okulveogretmeninogrencibasari-siuzerindeki etkisi [The effects of school and Teachers on student achievement]. Milli Egitim, 171: 156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Tomul E, Celik K, Tas A 2012. Siniftaadalet, ogrencial-giilariina gore ogretmendavranislarininDegerlendirilmesi [Justice in class, assesment of teacher behaviour according to student perceptions]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 48: 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Patrick H 2004. Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning Activities. Teachers College Record, 106: 1759-1795.
   Google Scholar
• Valiente C, Lemery-Chalfant K, Swanson J, Reiser M 2008. Prediction of children’s academic competence from their effortful control, relationships, and class-room participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100: 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Willms JD 2003. Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Zellman GL 1998. Understanding the impact of parental school involvement on children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Eduational Research, 91: 370–381.
   Google Scholar