The Predictive Power of Classroom Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs Related to Implementing the Constructivist Approach upon Their Level of Creating a Constructivist Learning Environment: A Mersin Case

References

• Andrew S, Vialle W 1998. Nursing Students’ Self-Efficacy, Self-regulated Learning andAcademic Performance In Science Teaching. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education C onferenc e.From http://www.aare.edu.au/98pap/abs98.html(Retrieved on 9 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Atasay S, Akdeniz AR 2006. Yapilandirmaci ogrenme kuramina uygun gelistirilen yalisma yapraklarinin uyg ulama siirecinin degerlendirilmesi. Milli Egitim Dergisi, 170: 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Aviram A 2000. Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 19: 465–489.
   Google Scholar
• Bagci-Kiliy G 2001. Olusturmaci fen ogretimi. Kuramve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1 (1): 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A 1994. Self-efficacy. In: VS Ramachaudran (Ed.): Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-81.
   Google Scholar
• Bikmaz HF 2002.Fen ogretiminde ozyeterlik inanci olyegi. Egitim Bilimlerive Uygulama, 1 (2): 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks MG, Brooks JG 1999. The courage to be Constructivist. Educational Leadership, 57 (3): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bukova-Giizel E 2007. Matematik ogretmen adaylarinin limit kavramini ogrenmelerinde yapilandirmaci ogrenme ortaminin etkisinin belirlenmesi. Kuramve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (3): 1155–1198.
   Google Scholar
• Butler D 2002. Individualizing instruction in self-regu-lated learning. Theory into Practice, 41 (2): 81-92.
   Google Scholar
• BUyuközturk S 2009. Sosyal bilimler kin veri analizi elkitabi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• BUyuközturk S, Kiliycakmak E, Akgiin OE, Karadeniz S, Demirel F 2008. Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Cha H,Yager RE 2003. Effectiveness of the Korean science teacher education programs concerning the teacher conceptions of constructivism and STS. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23 (4): 341–359.
   Google Scholar
• Charambous C, Philippou G, Kyriakides L 2004. Towards a Unified Model on Teachers’ Concerns and Efficacy Beliefs Related to a Mathematics Reform. Proceedings of the 28th Conference on theInternational Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2: 199-206.
   Google Scholar
• Chye S, Walker RA, Smith 11997. Self-regulated Learning in Tertiary Students: The Role of Culture and Self-efficacy on Strategy Use and Academic Achievement. Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education.From http://Www.aare.edu.au/97pap/chyes350.htm (Retrieved on 15 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Crano WD, Brewer MB 2002. Principles and Methods of Social Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Çikrikçi S 2014. Ilkokul ogretmenlerinin yapilandirmaci yaklasimi uygulamaya yonelik tutumlari ile ozyeterlikleri arasindaki ilidki. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi 31: 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• Çikrikçi SÇinar O, Teyfur E, Teyfur M 2006. Ilkogretim okulu ogretmen ve yoneticilerinin ya pilandirmaci egitim yaklasimi ve program hakkindaki görübleri. Inönii Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, 7 (11): 47-64.
   Google Scholar
• Evrekli E, Sasmaz-Oren F, Inel D 2010. Ogretmen Adaylarinin Yapilandirmaci Yaklasimi Uygulamaya )(one-lik oz Yeterliliklerinin Cinsiyet, BolUm ve Sinif Diizeyi Degiskenleri Ayisindan Incelenmesi. I. Uluslararasi Egitimde Yeni Yönelimler ye Yansimalari KonferAnsinda Sunulan Bildiri, Antalya, Tiirkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Fer S, Cirik I 2006. Ogretmenlerde ve ogrencilerde, yapilandirmaci ogrenme ortami ölyegirn.n geyerlik ve giivenirlik yalismasi nedir? Yeditepe Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, EDU 7, 2 (1): 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaith G, Yaghi M 1997. Relationships among Experience, teacher efficacy and attitudes toward the Implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13: 451–458.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey TR 1988. Teacher efficacy, self-concept and attitudes toward the implementation of Instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4 (1): 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Giiltepe MB, Yildirim 0, Sinan 0 2008. Solunum sistemi konusunun olusturmaci yaklasima dayali ogretiminin ogrenci basarisina etkisi. Ilkögretim-Online, 7 (2): 522-536.
   Google Scholar
• Hackmann DG 2004. Constructivism and block sched-uling: Making the connection.Phi Delta Kappan, 85: 697–703.
   Google Scholar
• Harland T 2003.Vygotsky’s zone of proximal Development and problem based learning: Linking a Theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8 (2): 263–272.
   Google Scholar
• Howard BC, McGee S, Schwartz N, Purcell S 2000. The experience of constructivism: Transforming Teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32 (4): 455–465.
   Google Scholar
• Karasar N 1998. Bilimsel Arastirma Yeintemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapoglu K, Duban N2012. Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin yapilandirmaci yaklasimi uygulamaya yonelik ozyeterlik inanylarini yordayan bir faktor olarak yapilandirmaci yaklasima yonelik tutumlari (Afy-onkarahisar Ili Ornegi). Mersin Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, 8 (2): 85-96.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Sharp JM, Thompson AD 1998.Effects of integrating problem solving, interactive multimedia and constructivism in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19 (1): 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Koy C 2013. Sinif ogretmenlerinin ozyeterlik algi lari ve yapilandirmaci ogrenme ortami olubturma beceri lerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, Ozel Sayi (1): 240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Leung M, Chan K 1998. Gender and Elective differences in the Motivated Strategies for Learning of Preservice Teacher Education in Hong Kong. From http://www.aare.edu.au/98pap/leu98366.htm (Re-trieved on 27 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Loyens SMM, Rikers RMJP, Schmidt HG 2007. Students’ conceptions of distinct constructivist assumptions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12: 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Maypole J, Davies TG 2001. Student’s perceptions of constructivist learning in a community college American history II survey course. Community College Review, 29 (2): 54–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares F 1996. Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66: 543–578.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR, De Groot E 1990. Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom Academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson V 1997. Constructivist teaching and Teacher education. Theory and Practice, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rikers RMJP, Tamara Van Gog TV, Paas F 2008. The effects of constructivist learning environments: A commentary. Instructional Science, 36: 463-467.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk DH 1990. Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1): 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Senemoglu N 1997. Gelisim ogrenme ye ögretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Ertem Matbaacilik.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell A 2002. Constructivism and student misconceptions: Why every teacher needs to know about them. Australian Science Teacher Journal, 48: 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Solomonidou C, Kolokotronis D 2008. The role of Constructivist educational software on students’ Learning regarding mechanical interaction. Educ Inf Techno1,13(3): 185-219.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens T, Olivarez Jr A, Lan WY, Tallent-Runnels MK 2004. Role of mathematics self-efficacy and motivation in mathematics performance across ethnicity. The Journal of Educational Research, 97 (4): 208–222.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum G, Naidu S, Jegede 0, Austin J 2001. Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory Investigation. Learning and Instruction, 11: 87-111.
   Google Scholar
• Tezci E, Gürol A 2003. Olusturmaci ogrenme tasarimi ve yaraticilik. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 2 (1): 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran M,Woolfolk Hoy A 2001. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (7): 783–805.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjala P 1998. Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: Do learning out-comes differ? Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2): 173-190.Oredi L 2013. The effect of classroom teachers’ attitudes toward constructivist approach on their level of establishing a constructivist learning environment: A case of Mersin. Educational Research and Re-views, 8 (11): 668–676.doi: 10.5897/ERR2013.1468
   Google Scholar
• Warwick P, Stephenson P2002. Editorial article reConstructing science in education: Insights and Strategies for making it more meaningful. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32 (2): 143-151.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley KF 2005. The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21: 747–766.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf MR 1994. Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (2): 197–223.
   Google Scholar
• Yanpar Yelken T, Oredi L, TanrisevenI, Kiliy F 2010. Ilkogretim müfettislerinin yapilandirmaci program ile 8gretmenlerin yapilandirmaci ogrenme ortami olusturma düzeylerine iliskin görüsleri. Cukurova Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitiisii Dergisi, 19 (2): 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz M, Koseoglu P, Geryek C, Soran H 2004. Ogretmen oz yeterlik inanci. Bilim ye Aklin Aydinliginda Egitim Dergisi, 5 (58). From http://yayim.meb.gov.tr./dergiler/sayi58/yilmaz-koseoglu.htm (Re-trieved on 18 February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Young SH,Vrongistinos K 2002. In-service teachers’ self-regulated learning strategies related to their Academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29 (3): 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Zajacova A, Lynch S, Espenshade T 2005. Self-Efficacy, stress and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46 (6): 677–706.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Educational Psychology, 25: 82–91.
   Google Scholar