Classroom Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Constructivist Approach

References

• Alesandrini K, Larson L 2002. Teachers Bridge to Constructivism. The Clearing House, 75: 118-122. From proquest database (Retrieved on 19 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Alkan C, Deryakulu D, Simsek. N 1995. Egitim teknolojisine Gins: Disiplin Siirec Uriin. Ankara: Onder Matbaacilik.
   Google Scholar
• Aviram A 2000. Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 19: 465–489.
   Google Scholar
• Balim AG, Kesercioglu T, Inel D, Evrekli E 2009. Fen ogretmen adaylarinin yapiilandirmaci yaklasima Yonelik göriislerinin farkli d9gibkenler ayisindan Incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Egitim Fakiiltesi Dergisi, 27: 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A 1994. Self-efficacy. In: VS Ramachaudran (Ed.): Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-81.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Baysal C, Tekarslan E 1998. Davranis bilimleri. Istanbul: Istanbul Universitesi Isletme Fakiiltesi Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Bikmaz HF 2004. Sinif ögretmenlerinin fen ögretiminde ozyeterlik inanci ölyegi“nin geyerlik ve gövenirlik yalismasi. Milli Egitim Dergisi, 161.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts M 2002. Motivation to learn. Educational Practices Series, 10: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks MG, Brooks JG 1999. The courage to be Constructivist. Educational Leadership, 57 (3): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Butler D 2002. Individualizing instruction in self-regu-lated learning. Theory into Practice, 41 (2): 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Boyiiköztörk A, Kiliycakmak E, Akgön OE, Karadeniz A, Demirel F 2008. Bilimsel Arastirma Yöntemleri. Ankara: PegemYayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Can T 2004. Yabanci Dil Olarak Ingilizce Ogretmenlerinin Yetistirilmesinde Kuram ye Uygulama Boyutuyla Olusturmaci Yaklasim. Yayinlanmamis Yöksek Lisans Tezi. Istanbul: Istanbul Universitesi. Cha H, Yager RE 2003. Effectiveness of the Korean science teacher education programs concerning the teacher conceptions of constructivism and STS. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23 (4): 341–359.
   Google Scholar
• Charambous C, Philippou G, Kyriakides L 2004. Towards a Unified Model on Teachers’ Concerns and Efficacy Beliefs Related to a Mathematics Reform. Proceedings of the 28th Conference on the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2: 199-206.
   Google Scholar
• Çayak S 2014. Ilkokul ögretmenlerinin yapilandirmaci yaklabimi uygulamaya yönelik tutumlari ile özYeterlikleri arasindaki iliski. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, 31: 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• Çetin B 2009. Yeni ilkögretim programi (2005) Uygulamalarinin ilkögretim 4. ve 5. Sinif ögrencilerinin ozyeterliliklerine etkisi. Pam ukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, 1 (25): 130–141.
   Google Scholar
• De Mesquita PB, Drake JC 1994. Educational reform and the self-efficacy beliefs of teachers Implementing non graded primary school programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10 (3): 291-302.
   Google Scholar
• Demir S, Onen F, Sahin F 2012. Fen Bilgisi Ogretmen Adaylarinin yapilandirmaci Yaklasimi Uygulamaya Yönelik Ozyeterlilik inany Dözeylerinin Belirlenmesi Uzerine Bir Arastirma. X Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ye Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, Nigde Universitesi Egitim Faköltesi, Nigde (27-30 Haziran).
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle PE, Camp WG 1999. Constructivism: The Vocational and Technical Education Perspective. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 16: 23-46. From http://edpsychserver.ed.vt.edu/research.cfm (Retrieved on 14 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Eaton MJ, Dembo MH 1997. Differences in the motivational beliefs of Asian-American and non-Asian students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3: 433–440.
   Google Scholar
• Ekici G 2002. Biyoloji ögretmenlerinin laboratuvar dersine yönelik tutum ölyegi (BOLDYTO). Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, 22: 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Evrekli E, Inel D, Balim AG, Kesercioglu T 2009. Fen ögretmen adaylarina yönelik yapiilandirmaci yaklasim tutum ölyegi: geyerlilik ve gövenirlik yalSrsmasi. Turk Fen Egitimi Dergisi (Turkish Science Education), 6 (2): 134–148.
   Google Scholar
• Evrekli E, Sasmaz-Oren F, Inel D 2010. Ogretmen Adaylarinin Yapilandirmaci Yaklasimi Uygulamaya )(one-lik Ozyeterliliklerinin Cinsiyet, Bölöm ve Sinif Dözeyi Degiskenleri Acisindan Incelenmesi. I. Uluslararasi Egitimde Yeni Yeinelimler ye Yansimalari Konferansinda Sun ulan Bildiri, Antalya, Törkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaith G, Yaghi M 1997. Relationships among Experience, teacher efficacy and attitudes toward the Implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13: 451–458.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey TR 1988. Teacher efficacy, self-concept and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4 (1): 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Howard BC, McGee S, Schwartz N, Purcell S 2000. The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32 (4): 455–465.
   Google Scholar
• Inel D, Törkmen L, Evrekli E 2010. Sinif Ogretmeni Adaylarinin Yapilandirmaci Yaklasima Iliskin Göröslerinin ve Tutumlarinin Incelenmesi: Usak Universitesi Ornegi. 9. Ulusal Fen ye Matematik Egitimi Kongresinde Sun ulan Bildiri, Izmir, Törkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Isikoglu N, Bastörk R, Karaca F 2009. Assessing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student-centered education: A Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25: 350–356.
   Google Scholar
• Kadhiravan S, Balasubramanian N 1999. Computer Anxiety and Attitude Towards Computers in Relation to Achievement In Computer Science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Collaborative and Networked Learning. New Delhi. India. From http://www.india.edu/ignouconf/papers/pad002.html (Retrieved on 1 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kasapoglu K, Duban N 2012. Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin yapilandirmaci yaklasimi uygulamaya yönelik oz yeterlik inanylarini yordayan bir faktör olarak yapilandirmaci yaklasima yönelik tutumlari (Afyonkara-hisar Ili Ornegi). Mersin Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, 8 (2): 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya N 2013. Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Yapiiilandirmaciliga Yeinelik Tutumlari ye Yapilandirmaciligi Uygulamaya Riskin Oz yeterlik Inançlari (4b,onkarahisar Ili Ornegi). Afyon Kocatepe Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitösö, Yayinlanmamis Yöksek Lisans Tezi. Kim MK, Sharp JM, Thompson AD 1998. Effects of integrating problem solving, interactive multimedia, and constructivism in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19 (1): 83-108.
   Google Scholar
• Klausmeier HS, Allen PS 1978. Cognitive Development of Children and Youth a Longitudinal Study. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koy C 2013. Sinif ögretmenlerinin özyeterlik algiilari ve yapilandirmaci ögrenme ortami olubturma Becerilerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakfiltesi Dergisi, (1): 240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Maharg P 2000. Rogers, constructivism and jurisprudence: Educational critique and the legal curriculum. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 7: 189–203.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews MR 2002. Constructivism and Science Education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11 (2): 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell JC 2002. Kazanan tutum. Istanbul: Kurtib Matbaa Ltd. sti.
   Google Scholar
• Maypole J, Davies TG 2001. Student’s perceptions of constructivist learning in a community college American history II survey course. Community College Review, 29 (2): 54–79
   Google Scholar
• McCoach DB 2002. A validation study of the school attitude assessment survey. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35 (2): 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares F 2002. Overview of Social Cognitive Theory and Self-efficacy. From http://www.emory.edu/Education/mfp/eff.html (Retrieved on 11 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Schunk DH 1990. Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1): 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Sert N 2008. Ilkögretim programlarinda olusturmacilik. Egitimde Kuram ye Uygulama, 4 (2): 291–316.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell A, St George A 2000. Developing efficacy beliefs in the classroom. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1 (2): 58–71.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp C 2002. Study support and the development of self-regulated learner. Educational Research, 44 (1): 29–42 .
   Google Scholar
• Tanriseven firedi I, firedi L 2009. A variable which can be effective in constructivist learning environments: Teaching style preference. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 4 (4): 1171–1185.
   Google Scholar
• Tavsancil E 2002. Tutumlarin 0101mesi ye Spss Ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk Hoy A, Hoy WK 1998. Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2): 202–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ülgen G 1995. Egitim Psikolojisi. Ankara: Bilim Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Oredi L 2013. The effect of classroom teachers’ attitudes toward constructivist approach on their level of establishing a constructivist learning environment: A case of Mersin. Educational Research and Reviews, 8 (11): 668–676.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield A, Eccles JS 2000. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz M, cimen 0 2008. Biyoloji egitimi tezsiz Yiiksek lisans ogrencilerinin biy9.1oji ogretimi ozyeterlik inane diizeyleri. Yüzüncü Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakiiltesi Dergisi, 5 (1): 20-29.
   Google Scholar