Investigation of Environmental Ethics Approaches of Students in Terms of Various Variables

References

• Al-Rabaani A, Al-Mekhlafi SSM 2009. Attitudes of Sultan Qaboos University students towards some Environmental problems and their willingness to take action to reduce them. Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (1): 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ajiboye JO, Silo N 2008. Enhancing Botswana Children’s environmental knowledge, attitudes and Practices through the school civic clubs. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3 (3): 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyagi-Usui M, Vinken H, Kuribayashi A 2003. proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors: An International comparison. Human Ecology Review, 10 (1): 23-3 1 .
   Google Scholar
• Buyukozturk S, Kilic Cakmak E, Akgun OE, Karadeniz S, Demirel F 2011. Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott JB, Frodeman R 2009. Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. USA: Macmillan Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Carkoglu A, Kentmen Cin C 2015. Economic Development environmental justice, and proenvironmental behavior. Environmental Politics, 24 (4): 575-597. Des Jardins JR 2006. Environmental Ethics: Introduction to Environmental Philosophy. (Trans. Rusen Keles). Ankara: Imge Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD 1978. The new Environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9: 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Emmet Jones R 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised nep scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3): 425–442.
   Google Scholar
• Eren M 2015. Responsibility ethics to cure the Environmental issues. Kelam Research, 13 (1): 439-452. Ertan B 2004. In the 2000s, environmental ethics Approaches and Turkey. Journal of Administration Sciences, 2 (1): 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Erten S 2007. Study on adaptation of the ecocentric, anthropocentric and antipathetic attitude scale. Educational Studies-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 28: 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Erten S 2008. Insights to ecocentric, anthropocentric and antipathetic attitudes towards environment in diverse cultures. Eurasian Journal of Educational Re-search, 8 (33): 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Erten S, Aydogdu C 2011. The ecocentric, anthropocentric and antipathhetic attitudes toward Environment in Turkish and Azerbaijani students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41: 158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon Thompson SC, Barton MA 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14 (2): 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gezer K, Cokadar H, Köse S, Bilen K 2006. A Comparison of High School Students’ Attitudes Towards the Environment. Paper presented in Buldan Symposium, Denizli, Törkiye, November 23 to 24, 2006. Gurbuzoglu Yalmanci S 2015. Development of the Environmental ethics’ attitude scale: The study of Validity and reliability. Turkish Journal of Education, 4 (2): 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gurbuzoglu Yalmanci S, Gozum AIC 2011. The Investigation of Kafkas University of candidate teachers’ attitudes towards environmental problems with re-spect to some variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3 (3): 1109-1132. Horwitz W 2001. Environmental dilemmas: The Resolutions of student activists. Ethics and Behavior, 10 (3): 281–308.
   Google Scholar
• Kilic S 2013. Environmental Ethic. Ankara: Orion Book-store.
   Google Scholar
• Kislalioglu M, Berkes F 2005. Environment and Ecology. Istanbul: Remzi Bookstore.
   Google Scholar
• Kortenkamp KV, Moore CF 2001. Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21: 261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Kortenkamp KV, Moore CF 2009. Children’s moral evaluations of ecological damage: The effect of biocentric and anthropocentric intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39 (8): 1785-1806. Mahmutoglu A 2009. Ethical Approach to the Environmental Problems in the Rural Areas. PhD Thesis. Ankara: University of Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan JH 2000. Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumers. 3th Edition. New York: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan JH, Schumacher S 2010. Evidence-based Inquiry: Research in Education. United States of America: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment 2001. Environmental and Human, IV. Environment Council. Cevre Bakanligi Yayin Organi, 48: 32-33, Ankara, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education (MNE) 2013. Göncel-lenen Ogretim Programlari/ The Updated Curriculum. From http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogre-tim-programlari/icerik/151 (Retrieved on 20 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education (MNE) 2014. 2014-2015 Egitim Ogretim Yilinda Okutulacak Ilk ve Orta Ogretim Ders Kitaplari/To be Instructed in the Academic Year 2014-2015 Primary and Secondary Education Textbooks. From http://www.meb.gov.tr/2014-2015-egitimogretim-yilinda-okutulacak-ilk-ve-orta-ogretim-ders-kitaplari/duyuru/7013 (Retrieved on 20 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Onkal G, Yaganak E 2005. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In: A Cevizci (Ed.): Environmental Ethic. Ankara: Babil Yayincilik, pp. 589-595.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir 0 2012. The environmentalism of university students: Their ethical attitudes toward the Environment. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43: 373–385.
   Google Scholar
• Ronald M 2002. A Heuristic for Environmental Values and Ethics, and a Psychometric Instrument to Measure Adult Environmental Ethics and Willingness to Protect the Environment. PhD Thesis. Ohio: The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rolstone H 2003. Environmental ethics. In: N Bunnin, EP Tsui-James (Eds): The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 517–530.
   Google Scholar
• Scarce R 1990. Eco-warriors: Understanding Radical Environmental Movement. Chicago: The Noble Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro DF, Takacs D 2006. A pragmatic, co-operative approach to teaching environmental ethics. In: C Palmer (Ed.): Teaching Environmental Ethics. Koninklijke Brill NV: The Netherlands, pp. 93-116. Sheppard JW 2006. Reducing pessimism’s sway in the environmental ethics classroom. In: C Palmer (Ed.): Teaching Environmental Ethics. Koninklijke Brill NV: The Netherlands, pp. 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Simsekli Y 2001. The evolution of the activities done in the schools which have been chosen for the Project of “Applied environmental training” in Bursa on the terms of the contribution of the school administrator and the charged teachers. Uludag University Journal of Education, 14 (1): 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• State Planning Organization (SPO) 2006. Environment Specialized Committees Report. IX Development Plan (2007-2013). Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Tamkoc G 1996. Ecofeminism purposes. Kadin Arastirmalari Dergisi/ Journal of Women’s Studies, 4: 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Unal S, Dimiski E 1999. The development of Environmental education under the auspices of Unesco-Unep and environmental education of secondary education in Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 16 (17): 142–154.
   Google Scholar
• Uygun S 2006. The globalization of environmental Issues, ethics and education. In: S Böyiikdövenci, V Tasdelen (Eds.): Philosophy of Education Arts: Gift of Saffet Bilhan. Ankara: Hece Yayinlari, pp. 279-290. Varner GE 1998. In Nature’s Interests? Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar