Comparison of Communication Patterns of Students in Online and Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning Environments with Discourse Analysis

References

• Anderson GL 2001. Disciplining leaders: A critical Discourse analysis of the ISLLC National Examination and Performance Standards in educational Administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 4 (3): 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard M, Chuang T, Ali S 2000. Does computerMediated collaboration really improve group Communication? Our general findings. Usability News, 2 (1): 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bower M, Hedberg J 2010. A quantitative multimodal discourse analysis of teaching and learning in a web-conferencing environment - The efficacy of student-centred learning designs. Computers and Education, 54 (2): 462–478.
   Google Scholar
• Belanger M 2008. Online collaborative learning for Labor education. Labor Studies Journal, 33 (4): 412–430.
   Google Scholar
• Diana P, Maddaloni D, Melillo L, Moffa G 2015. Teaching migration studies through collaborative learning practices in an intercultural environment: The case of the Erasmus IP “Sono un Migrante”. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Science, 174: 510-517. ISSN:1877-0428.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk TAV 1997. Discourse as interaction in society. In: TAV Dijk (Ed.): Discourse as Social Interacation. London: SAGE, P. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti A 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee JP 2014. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 4th Edition. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gojkov G, Stojanoviw A, Babic S 2013. Cognitive and learning styles and a method of discourse in higher education teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93: 762–774.
   Google Scholar
• Gu X, Shao Y, Guo X, Lim C 2015. Designing a role structure to engage students in computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 24 (2015): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Haslaman T, Demiraslan Y, Mumcu FK, Donmez 0, Asfkar P 2008. Cevrimici ortamda yapilan grup tartismasindaki iletisim oruntulerinin soylem cozumlemesi yoluyla incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 35: 162-174.
   Google Scholar
• Herring SC 1999. Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4 (4): Special issue on Persistent Conversation.
   Google Scholar
• Howell-Richardson C, Mellar H 1996. A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24: 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Imafuku R, Kataoka R, Mayahara M, Suzuki H, Saiki T 2014. Students’ experiences in interdisciplinary Problem-based learning: A discourse analysis of group Interaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 8 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen DH, Kwon HI 2001. Communication patterns in computermediated vs. face-to-face group Problem solving. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 49 (10): 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RH, Chik A, Hafner CA 2015. Introduction: Discourse analysis and digital practices. In: RH Jones, A Chik, CA Hafner (Eds.): Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age. London: Routledge, pp. 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Ke F, Hsu YC 2015. Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-Supported collaborative learning. The Internet and High-er Education, 26: 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Chiu MM, Law NW 2011. Collaborative argumentation and justifications: A statistical discourse Analysis of online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 946–955.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Jones M 2015. Classroom discourse analysis as a lens on languagein-education policy processes. In:FM Hult, DC Johnson (Eds.): Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 94-106.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur J 2004. Conversation analysis for educational technologists: Theoretical and methodological issues for researching the structures, processes and Meaning of on-line talk. In: D Jonassen (Ed.): Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: McMillian, pp. 1075-1098.
   Google Scholar
• McAteer E, Tolmie A, Duffy C, Corbett J 1997. computermediated communication as a learning resource. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 13: 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer N, Littleton K, Wegerif R 2004. Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational Activities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus TM 2005. Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing small group interactions in educational Environments. In: TS Roberts (Ed.): Computer-support-ed Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Hershey: IDEA Group Publishing, pp. 100-124.
   Google Scholar
• Potter J 2004. Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In: D Silverman (Ed.): Qualitative Analysis: Issues of Theory and Method. 2nd Edition. London: Sage, pp. 200-221.
   Google Scholar
• Schallert D, Chiang Y, Park Y, Jordan M, Lee Haekyung L, Cheng A, Chu H, Lee S, Kim T, Song K 2009. Being polite while fulfilling different discourse function in online classroom discussions. Computers and Education, 53: 713–725.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey E 1999. Collaborative learning in an online Environment. Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2): 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Turoff M, Hiltz SR, Bieber M, Rana A, Fjermestad J 1999. Collaborative discourse structures in computer mediated communications. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Wortham SEF, Reyes A 2015. Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yagelski RP, Grabill JT 1998. Computer mediated Communication in the undergraduate writing classroom: A study of the relationship of online discourse and classroom discourse in two writing courses. computers and Composition, 15: 11–40.
   Google Scholar