The Effect of Reciprocal and Direct Teaching Approaches on Summarizing Skill

References

• Anderson V, Hidi S 1989. Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46 (4): 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bretzing BH, Kulhavy RW, Caterino LC 1987. Note taking by junior high students. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (6): 359–362.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Day JD 1983. Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Day JD, Jones RS 1983. The developments of plans for summarizing text. Child Development, 54: 968–979.
   Google Scholar
• Cakir 0 1995. Buyuk Olcekli Kurallarin Ogretiminin Okudugunu Anlamaya Etkisi. PhD Thesis, UnPublished. Ankara: Hacettepe Universitesi.
   Google Scholar
• Cikrikci SS 2008. Ilkogretim ogrencilerinde ozetleme becerisinin gelisimi. Dil Dergisi, 141: 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Day JD 1980. Teaching Summarization Skills: comparison of Training Methods. PhD Thesis, UnPublished. Urbana: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan A 2013. Ustbilis ve ustbilise dayali ogretim. Middle Eastern and African Journal of Educational Research, 3: 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem C 2012. Turk Dili ve Edebiyati ogretmen Adaylarinin ozetleme stratejilerini kullanim tercihleri ve metin dil bilimsel bir ozetleme calismasi. Dil ye Edebiyat Egitimi Dergisi, 1 (3): 36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Eyup B, Stebler MZ, Yurt-Uzuner S 2012.Turkce Ogretmeni adaylarinin ozetleme stratejilerini kullanmadaki egilimleri. Dil ye Edebiyat Egitimi Dergisi, 1 (1): 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Garner R 1990. When children and adults do not use learning strategies toward a theory of settings. Re-view of Educational Research, 60 (4): 519–529.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn AL, Garner R 1985. Synthesis of research on students’ ability to summarize text Educational Leadership, 42 (5): 52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Karatay H, Okur S 2012. Ogretmen adaylarinin oykuleyici ve bilgilendirici metinleri ozetleme becerileri. International Journal of Social Science, 5 (7): 399–420.
   Google Scholar
• Kinstch W, van Dijk TA 1978. Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Re-view, 85 (5): 363–394.
   Google Scholar
• Kusdemir Y, Gunes F 2014. Dogrudan ogretim modelinin okudugunu anlama becerilerine etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 32: 86–113.
   Google Scholar
• Palincar AS, Brown AL 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (2): 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley M, Johnson CJ, Symons S, McGoldrick, Kurtia JA 1989. Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90 (3): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Raslie H, Mikeng D, Ting SH 2015. Reciprocal Teaching and comprehension of struggling readers. International Journal of Education, 7 (1): 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart SD, Stahl SA, Erickson LG 1986. Some Effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21 (4): 422–438.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine B, Meister C 1994. Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Re-search, 64 (4): 479–530.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk HD 2009. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (Trans. Eds. Muzaffer Sahin) Ankara: Nobel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senemoglu N 2013.Gelisim, Ogrenme ye Ogretim. Ankara: Pegem A Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seymoura JR, Osanab HP 2003.Reciprocal teaching procedures and principles: Two teachers’ Developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19: 325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin M 1983. Is Idaresinin Temel Kavramlari. Ankara: Anadolu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taspinar M, Atici B 2002. Ogretim model, strateji, yontem ve becerileri/teknikleri: Kavramsal boyut. Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 8: 207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut F1985. Egitimde Olcme ye Degerlendirme Metotlari. Ankara: Saydam Matbaacilik.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JP, Taylor MB, de Cani JS 1984. Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (6): 1065–1075.
   Google Scholar