Examination of the Relationship between Classroom Teachers’ Multiple Intelligence Areas and Their Students’ Academic Achievements

References

• Adcock PK 2014. The longevity of multiple Intelligence theory in education. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80 (4): 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kalbani MS, Al-Wahaibi S 2015. Testing the Multiple intelligences theory in Oman. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190: 106–112.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong T 2000. Multiple Intelligences in the Class-room. 2°d Edition. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Balci A 2004. Sosyal Bilimlerde Arastirma Yontem, Teknik ye Ilkeler. 4 Baski. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Brualdi AC 1996. Multiple intelligences: Gardner’s Theory. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 5 (10). From http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=10 (Retrieved on 15 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bumen NT 2010. Coklu zeka kurami ve egitim. Ozcan Demirel (Eds.): Egitimde Yeni Yonelimler. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik, 1-38.
   Google Scholar
• Campell B 1992. Multiple intelligences in action. Child-hood Education, 197–201.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell L, Campbell B, Dickinson D 1996. Teaching and Learning through Multiple Intelligence. Tucson Arizona: Zephyr.
   Google Scholar
• Checkly K 1997. The first seven. Educational Leadership, 55 (1): 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Durmaz H, Ozyildirim H 2005. Fen bilgisi ve sinif Ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin kimya dersine karsi tutumlari ve coklu zeka alanlari ile kimya ve Turkce derslerindeki basarilari arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi. Gazi Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi, 6 (1): 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner H 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner H 1999. Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21s1 Century. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Genc M 2012. Ogretmenlerin coklu zekd alanlari ile problem cozme becerileri arasindaki iliskinin Incelenmesi. Bartin Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 1 (1): 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ghamrawi N 2014. Multiple intelligences and ESL teaching and learning: An investigation in KG II class-rooms in one private school in Beirut, Lebanon. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25 (1): 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Green A, Hill A, Friday E, Friday SS 2005. The use of multiple intelligences to enhance team productivity. Management Decision, 43 (3): 349–359.
   Google Scholar
• Gungor F 2005. Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Zekci Alanlarina Gore Coklu Zekci Etkinliklerini Uygulama Durumlarinin Belirlenmesi. PhM Thesis, Unpublished. Zonguldak: Karaelmas Universitesi.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerr T 1997. The Naturalist Intelligence. From http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/mi/hoerrl.htm (Retrieved on 4 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Karasar N 2011. Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemi. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara J 2015. Multiple Intelligences and Minds as Attributes to Reconfigure PR-A Critical Analysis. Public Relations Review, From http://www.science-direct.com/science/article/pii/s036381111500034x (Retrieved on 5 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer M 1997. The GREENing of learning: Using the eight intelligence. Educational Leadership, 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan H 1996. An analysis of Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligence. Roeper Review, 18 (4): 263–269.
   Google Scholar
• Oral B 2001. Branslarina gore universite ogrencilerinin zekd alanlarinin incelenmesi, Egitim ye Bilim, 26 (122): 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdamar K 1999. Paket Programlarile Istatistiksel Veri Analizi. Eskisehir: Kaan Kitapevi.
   Google Scholar
• Saban A 2005. Coklu Zeka Teorisi ye Egitimi. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Saban A 2015. Conceptions of learning in light of the MI theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186: 231–237.
   Google Scholar
• Selcuk Z, Kayili H, Okut L 2004. Coklu Zeka Uygulamalari. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Serin U 2008. Izmir Ilinde Gorey Yapan Fen Alani Ogretmenlerinin Ogretme Strateji ye Stilleri ile Tercih Ettikleri Ogretim Yontemleri ye Coklu Zeka Alanlari Arasindaki Iliski. PhD Thesis, Unpublished. Izmir: Dokuz Eylul Universitesi.
   Google Scholar
• Shearer B 2004. Multiple intelligences theory after 20 years. Teachers College Record, 106 (1): 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford P 2003. Multiple intelligence for every class-room. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39 (2): 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ 2014. Teaching about the nature of Intelligence. Intelligence, 42: 176–179.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent A, Ross D 2001. Personalize training: Determine learning styles, personality types and multiple intelligences online. The Learning Organization, 8 (1): 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Walters J 1992. Application of Multiple Intelligences Research in Alternative Assessment. Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on Evaluation and Measurement. 2, Washington, DC, September 4-6, 1991. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349812.
   Google Scholar
• Weller LD 1999. Application of the multiple Intelligences theory in quality organizations. Team Performance Management, 5 (4): 136–146.
   Google Scholar
• Yucel S, Ince HH, Oral B 2006. Diyarbakir’da degisik branslardaki fenedebiyat ve egitim fakultesi mezunu biyoloji ogretmenleri ile biyoloji ogrencilerinin zekd alanlarinin incelenmesi. DU Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 7: 31–46.
   Google Scholar