The heterogeneous relation between firm size and corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from listed companies in China

References

• M. Buchinsky, Estimating the asymptotic covariance matrix for quantile regression models: A Monte Carlo study. J. Econometrics. Vol. 65, 1995, pp. 303–338.
   Google Scholar
• M. Buchinsky, Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research. J. Human Res. Vol. 33, 1998, pp. 88–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. Callihan, Corporate effective tax rates: A synthesis of the literature. J. Acc. Lit. Vol. 13, 1994, pp. 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• A. Deaton, The analysis of household surveys: A micreconometric approach to development policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• C. Derashid and H. Zhang, Effective tax rates and the industrial policy hypothesis: Evidence from Malaysia. J. Int. Acc. Aud. Tax. Vol. 12, 2003, pp. 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Newberry, Determinants of the variability of corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. J. Acc. Public Pol. Vol. 16, 1997, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• G. W. Gustavsen and K. Rickertsen, The effects of taxes on purchases of sugar-sweetened carbonated soft drinks: a quantile regression approach. Appl. Econ. Vol. 43, 2011, pp. 707–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Holland, Accounting policy choice: The relationship between corporate tax burdens and company size. J. Bus. Finance and Acc. Vol. 25, 1998, pp. 265–88.
   Google Scholar
• Y. C. Hsieh, New evidence on determinants of corporate effective tax rates. AJBM. Vol. 6, 2012, pp. 1177–1180.
   Google Scholar
• K. A. Kim and P. Limpaphayom, Tax and firm size in Pacific-Basin emerging economies. J. Int. Acc. Aud. Tax. Vol. 7, 1998, pp. 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• B. B. Kern and M. H. Morris, Taxes and firm size: The effect of tax legislation during the 1980s. J. Amer. Tax. Assoc. Vol. 14, 1992, pp. 80–96.
   Google Scholar
• R. Koenker, Quantile regression, Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• R. Koenker and J. G. Bassett, Regression quantiles. Econometrica. Vol. 46, 1978, pp. 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Liu and S. Cao, Determinants of corporate effective tax rates Evidence from listed companies in China. The Chinese Econ. Vol. 40, 2007, pp. 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• T. M. Porcano, Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive. J. Acc. Public Pol. Vol. 7, 1986, pp. 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. Powell, Censored regression quantiles. J. Econometrics. Vol. 32, 1986, pp. 143–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Shelvin and S. S. Porter, The corporate tax Comeback in 1987: Some further evidence. J. Amer. Tax. Assoc. Vol. 14, 1992, pp. 58–79.
   Google Scholar
• C. P. Stickney and V. E. McGee, Effective corporate tax rates: The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. J. Acc. Public Pol. Vol. 1, 1982, pp. 125–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. J. Wilkie, Corporate average effective tax rates and inferences about the relative tax preference. J. Amer. Tax. Assoc. Vol. 10, 1988, pp. 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• P. J. Wilkie and S. T. Limberg, The relationship between firm size and effective tax rate: A reconciliation of Zimmerman (1983) and Porcano (1986). J. Amer. Tax. Assoc. Vol. 11, 1990, pp. 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• L. Wu, Y Wang, B. X. Lin, C. Li and S. Chen, Local tax rebates, corporate tax burdens, and firm migration: Evidence from China. J. Acc. Public Pol. Vol. 26, 2007, pp. 555–583.
   Google Scholar
• J. Yao, Corporate effective tax and the policy of first levying and then rebating taxes. Tax. Res. J. Vol. 19, 2003, pp. 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. Zimmerman, Tax and Firm Size. J. Acc. and Econ. Vol. 5, 1983, pp. 119–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar