Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Statistics and Management Systems Volume 20, 2017 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
93
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The empirical study of impact critical security factors of mobile applications on technology acceptance model

Yi-Lun ChiDepartment of Marketing and Supply Chain Management Overseas Chinese University, 100 Chiao Kwang Rd., Taichung40721, Taiwan, R.O.CCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Yuan-Cheng TsaiDepartment of Marketing and Supply Chain Management Overseas Chinese University, 100 Chiao Kwang Rd., Taichung40721, Taiwan, R.O.C
Pages 245-273 | Received 01 Feb 2016, Published online: 21 Apr 2017

References

  • Abrams, R. (2010). Android Application Security. blog, 19(Aug), http://blog.eset.com/2010/08/19/android-application-security-2.
  • Anckar, B., & D’incau D. (2002). Value Creation in Mobile Commerce: Findings from a Consumer Survey. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 4(1), 43–64.
  • Butler, M. (2011). Android: Changing the Mobile Landscape. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 10(1), 4–7. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2011.1
  • Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002). An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Siruational Factors. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 61(3), 184–201. doi: 10.1177/0092070302303001
  • Davis, F. D. (1986). Doctoral Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management. Cambridge, MA.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. doi: 10.2307/249008
  • Hong, W., Wong, W., Thong, J. & Tam, K. (2002). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97–124.
  • Hong, X. Y., Zhang, S.Y., & Guo, J. Y. (2011). key factors affecting organizational adoption and application information security management system certification. Computer Audit Journal, 23, 99–112.
  • Huang, X. G., Han, H. E., Kuo, G. M., & Cheng, K. T. (2011). Diabetes was used as an example to explore the key factors affecting hospitals to build personal health records portal based on Information staff’s view. Information Management Journal, 19(2), 407–437.
  • Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of computer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127–143. doi: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518115
  • Legris, P., Inghamb, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information and Management, 40(3), 191–204. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  • Lewis, W., Agarwal, R. & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657–678.
  • Lin, J. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a website. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197–208. doi: 10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00005-0
  • Lucas, H. C., & Spitler, V. K. (1999). Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 291–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01611.x
  • Ong, C. S., Lai, J. Y., and Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795–804. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012
  • Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  • Noyes, K. (2010). Why Android App Security Is Better than for iPhon. PCWorld, 6 Aug.;www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/202758why_android_app_security_is_better_than_for_the_iphone.html
  • Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.