An empirical study of behavioral intention model: Using learning and teaching styles as individual differences

References

• J.W. Moon, Y.G. Kim, Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context, inf. manag. 38(4) (2001), 217–230. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Inf. Syst. Res. 46(2) (2000) 186–204.
   Google Scholar
• H.O. Awa, B.M. Nwibere, B.J. Inyang, The uptake of electronic commerce by SMEs: A meta theoretical framework expanding the determining constructs of Tam and Toe frameworks, J.Glob. Bus. Technol. 6(1) (2010) 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• N. Bousbia, I. Rebai, J.M. Labat, A. Balla, Analysing the relationship between learning styles and navigation behaviour in web-based educational system, knowledge management and e-learning. An International J. 2(4)(2010) 400–421.
   Google Scholar
• M.I. Santally, Y. Rajabalee, D. Cooshna-Naik, Learning design implementation for distance e-learning: Blending rapid e-learning techniques with activity-based pedagogies to design and implement a socio-constructivist eenvironment, Eur. J. Open, Distance and e-Learning, Date of publication: 30.07.2012
   Google Scholar
• M. Moore, Three types of interaction. am. J. Distance Education, 3(2) (1989) 1–6. doi: 10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• T. Anderson, D.R. Garrison, Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson ed., Madison WI: Atwood Publishing, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• T. Anderson, Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. Moore & G. Anderson eds., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• U.P.T.Maldonado, G.F. Khan, J. Moon, J.J. Rho, E-Learning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Inf.Rev., 35(1) (2011) 66–85. doi: 10.1108/14684521111113597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.Sumak, M. Hericko, G. Polancic, M. Pusnik, Investigation of e-learning system acceptance using UTAUT. International J. Eng. Education, 26(6) (2010) 1327–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M.van Raaij, J.J.L. Schepers, The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3) (2008) 838–852. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.R. Peterson, S.G. Rayner, S. J. Armstrong, Researching the psychology ofcognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future? Learning and Individ. Differences, 19(2009) 518−523. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Bostrom, L. Olfman, M.K. Sein, The importance of learning style in end-user training, MIS Q., 14(1) (1990) 101–120. doi: 10.2307/249313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• T. O’Conner, Using Learning Styles to Adapt Technology for Higher Education, Retrieved Sep. 22, 2010, from http://www.serprofesso-runiversitario.pro.br/ler.php?modulo=8&texto=397.
   Google Scholar
• R. M. Felder, L.K. Silverman, learning and teaching styles in engineering education.Eng. Education, 78(7) (1988) 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.David, Gender Differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q., 21(4) (1997) 389–400. doi: 10.2307/249720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.P. Lu, H.J. Yu, S. Lu, The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: An empirical study. Eur.J. Operational res., 131(2001) 649–663. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00107-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.K. Blaylock, L.P. Rees, Cognitive style and the usefulness of information, Decis. Sci., 15(1984) 74–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1984.tb01197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Sabry, B. lynne, Web-based learning interaction and learning styles, Br. J. Education Techbology, 34(4)(2003) 443–454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.Z. Zacharis, The effect of learning style on preference for web-based courses and learning outcomes, Br. J. Education Technology, 42(5)(2011) 790–800 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Graf, T.C.Liu, Kinshuk, Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. J. Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2) (2010) 116–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Akkoyunlu, M.Y.Soylu, A study of students’ perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technol. Soc., 11(1) (2008) 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.K. Lu, Learning styles and acceptance of e-learning management systems: An extension of behaviour intention model. International J. Mob. Learning Organ., 6(2) (2012) 246–259. doi: 10.1504/IJMLO.2012.050044
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Hudak, D. E. Anderson, Teaching style and student ratings. Teaching of Psychology, 11(3) (1984) 177–178. doi: 10.1177/009862838401100316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.F. Chen, H.Z. Chen, S.C. Tseng, B.C. Kuo, Measurements of teaching styles for computering teachers. Paper presented at the 2007 National computer symposium, Taipei (2007)..
   Google Scholar
• A. F. Grasha, Using traditional versus naturalistic approaches to assessing learning styles in college teaching. J. on Excellence in Coll. Teaching, 1(1990) 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• A. F. Grasha, A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model. facilitator, and delegator. Coll. Teaching, 42(4) (1994) 142–149. doi: 10.1080/87567555.1994.9926845
   Google Scholar
• A. F.Grasha, A Grasha-Riechmann teaching style survey. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2010, from http://www.longleaf.net/teachingstyle.html (2010).
   Google Scholar
• N.A.Razak, F. Ahmad, P.M.Shah, Perceived and preferred teaching styles (methods) of english for specific purposes (ESP) Students. J. e-Bangi, 2(2) (2007) 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• P.C.Lin, H.K. Lu, C.H. Lo, Exploring the impact of perceived teaching style on behavioral intention toward E-Learning systems. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Thailand, (2012).
   Google Scholar
• H. C.Lucas, V.K.Spitler, Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2) (1999) 291–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, Why don’t men ever stop to ask for dDirections? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour, MIS Q., 24(1)(2000) 115–139. doi: 10.2307/3250981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Agarwal, J. Prasad, Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decis. Sci., 30(2) (1999) 361–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Torkzadeh, T. P. Van Dyke, Effects of Training on Internet Self-efficacy and Computer User Attitudes. Computers in Hum. Behavior, 18(2002) 479–494. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. G. Zikmund, Business Research Method. Fifth ed. The Dryden press, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Orlando, Florida. (1997).
   Google Scholar
• T.F. Hawk, A.J. Shah, Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decis. Sci. J. Innovative Education, 5(1)(2007) 1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Zywno, A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman’s. Index of Learning Styles, Proc. 2003 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE, (2003).
   Google Scholar
• R.M. Felder, J.E.Spurlin, Applications, reliability, and validity of the index of learning styles. Intl. J. Eng. Education, 21(1) (2005) 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.A. Soloman, R. M. Felder, Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire;, Retrieved March 1, 2013, http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learning-styles/ilsweb.html retrieved.
   Google Scholar