Computational quantum key distribution (CQKD) on decentralized ledger and blockchain

References

• P.W. Shor, Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer, SIAM Journal on Computing, 26, 5, 1484–1509, 1997. doi: 10.1137/S0097539795293172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Bernstein, Introduction to post-quantum cryptography, Post-Quantum Cryptography, pp.1-14, Eds.Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-88702-7, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Peikert, Lattice Cryptography for the Internet, Proc.of CRYPTO 2014 is the 34rd International Cryptology Conference, pp1-25, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• T. Güneysu, V. Lyubashevsky, T. Pöppelmann, Practical Lattice-Based Cryptography: A Signature Scheme for Embedded Systems, Proc. of Cryptographic hardware and embedded systems - CHES 2012, 14th international workshop, Leuven, Belgium, Proceedings, pp.530-547, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Ding, M. Snook, Ö. Dagdelen, Authenticated Key Exchange from Ideal Lattices, Oswald E., Fischlin M. (eds) Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9057, pp.719-751, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• L. Ducas, A. Durmus, T. Lepoint, V. Lyubashevsky, Lattice Signatures and Bimodal Gaussians, R. Canetti and J.A. Garay (Eds.), CRYPTO 2013, pp. 40–56, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• V. Lyubashevsky, C. Peikert, O. Regev, On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors Over Rings, H. Gilbert (Ed.), Proceedings of Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2010: 29th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, pp.1-23, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• D. Stehlé, R. Steinfeld, Making NTRUEncrypt and NTRUSign as Secure as Standard Worst-Case Problems over Ideal Lattices, Paterson K.G. (eds) Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.27-47, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• C. Easttom, An Analysis of Leading Lattice-Based Asymmetric Cryptographic Primitivess, Proc. of 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• T. Matsumoto, H. Imai, Public Quadratic Polynomial-Tuples for Efficient Signature-Verification and Message-Encryption, EUROCRYPT 1988: Advances in Cryptology’ EUROCRYPT ‘88, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp.419-453, doi:10.1007/3-540-45961-8_39, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• J. Patarin, Cryptanalysis of the Matsumoto and Imai Public Key Scheme of Eurocrypt’88, Advances in Cryptology’ CRYPT0’ 95, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp.248-261, doi:10.1007/3-540-44750-4_20, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• J. Patarin, Hidden Field Equations (HFE) and Isomorphisms of Polynomials (IP): two new Families of Asymmetric Algorithms, U. Maurer (Ed.): Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ‘96, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.1070, pp. 33-48, pp.33-48, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• J. Ding, D. Schmidt, Rainbow, a New Multivariable Polynomial Signature Scheme, Ioannidis, John (ed.), Proc. of Third International Conference, ACNS 2005, New York, NY, USA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3531, pp. 164–175, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• J. Buchmann, E. Dahmen, A.Hülsing, XMSS - A Practical Forward Secure Signature Scheme Based on Minimal Security Assumptions, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 7071 (Post-Quantum Cryptography. PQCrypto 2011), pp.117–129, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25405-5_8, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Bernstein, D. Hopwood, A. Hülsing, T. Lange, R. Niederhagen, L. Papachristodoulou, M. Schneider, P. Schwabe, Z. Wilcox-O’Hearn, Oswald, Elisabeth; Fischlin, Marc (eds.), SPHINCS: practical stateless hash-based signatures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9056. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 368–397, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46800-5_15, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• M. Naor, M. Yung, Universal One-Way Hash Functions and their Cryptographic Applications, Proceedings of STOC 1989, pp. 33-43, DOI: 10.1145/73007.73011, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• R. Overbeck, N. Sendrier, Code-based cryptography, in D.J. Bernstein, J.Buchmann, E.Dahmen (Eds), Post-Quantum Cryptography. pp. 95–145, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7_4, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• L. De Feo, P. Jao, Towards quantum-resistant cryptosystems from supersingular elliptic curve isogenies, In: Yang BY. (eds) Post-Quantum Cryptography, PQCrypto 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7071. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.19-34, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• W. Diffie, P.C. van Oorschot, M.J. Wiener, Authentication and Authenticated Key Exchanges, in Designs, Codes and Cryptography, Vol.2 pp.107–125, DOI:10.1007/BF00124891, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• X. Sun, H. Tian, Y. Wang, Toward Quantum-Resistant Strong Designated Verifier Signature from Isogenies, in IEEE Proc. Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS), 2012, pp. 292–296, doi:10.1109/iNCoS.2012.70, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• R.A. Perlner, D.A. Cooper, Quantum Resistant Public Key Cryptography: A Survey, IDtrust ‘09: Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Identity and Trust on the Internet, pp.85-93, doi: 10.1145/1527017.1527028, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• M. Campagna, T. Hardjono, L. Pintsov, B. Romansky and T. Yu, Kerberos Revisited Quantum-Safe Authentication, in ETSI Quantum-Safe-Crypto Workshop September 15 2013, pp.1-18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Manish Kalra & Ramesh C. Poonia (2017) Design a new protocol for quantum key distribution, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 38:6, 1047-1054, DOI: 10.1080/02522667.2017.1374723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manish Kalra & Ramesh C. Poonia (2018) Simulation of BB84 and proposed protocol for quantum key distribution, Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 21:4, 661-666, DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2018.1475075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankit Kumar, Pankaj Dadheech, Vijander Singh, Ramesh C. Poonia & Linesh Raja (2019) An improved quantum key distribution protocol for verification, Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 22:4, 491-498, DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2019.1637153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankit Kumar, Pankaj Dadheech, Vijander Singh, Linesh Raja & Ramesh C. Poonia (2019) An enhanced quantum key distribution protocol for security authentication, Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 22:4, 499-507, DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2019.1637154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VV.AA. https://wiki2.org/en/Post-quantum_cryptography, retrieved 18-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• VV.AA, OpenQuantumSafe, openquantumsafe.org, retrieved 18-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• D. Stebila and M. Mosca, Post-Quantum Key Exchange for the Internet and the Open Quantum Safe Project, Invited Lecture at Selected Areas in Cryptography (SAC) 2016 by D. Stebila. References and related work updated, https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1017, July 28, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, Quantum Cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing, Int.Conf. on Comp., Syst. Signal Processing, Bagalore, India, pp.175-179, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• S. Wiesner, Conjugate Coding, SIGACT News, 15:1, pp.78-88, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• P. Higgins, Pushing for Perfect Forward Secrecy, an Important Web Privacy Protection, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Retrieved 18-01-2020.
   Google Scholar