References
- Besselar, P. v. d. and Leydesdorff, L., Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences. Research Evaluation, Vol.18, 2009, pp. 273–288.
- Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L., Besselaar P. v. d., A Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4, 2009, pp. 211–220.
- EC–European Commission. Frontier research: The European Challenge. High Level Expert Group Report, EUR 21619. 2005.
- Glänzel, W., and Meyer, M., Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of “reverse” citation relations. Scientometrics, Vol. 58, 2003, pp. 415–428.
- Glänzel, W., and Zhou, P., Publication activity, citation impact and bi-directional links between publications and patents in biotechnology. Scientometrics, Vol. 86, pp. 2011, 505–525.
- Hörlesberger M., Roche I., Besagni D., Scherngell T., François C., Cuxac P., Schiebel E., Zitt M., Holste D., A concept for inferring “frontier research” in grant proposals. Scientometrics, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1008-6, Vol. 97, 2013, pp. 129–148.
- Juznic, P., Peclin, S., Zaucer, M., Mandelj, T., Pusnik, M, and Demsar, F., Scientometric indicators: peer review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interest. Scientometrics, Vol. 85, 2010, pp. 429–441.
- Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., and Schmoch, U., Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S &T systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
- Polanco X., François C., Royauté J., Besagni D., and Roche I., Stanalyst®: An integrated environment for clustering and mapping analysis on science and technology. In: Proceedings of the 8th ISSI, Sydney, (Australia), July 16th -20th . 2001
- Stokes, D., Pasteur's Quadrant Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press. 1997