Research trend on the application of “E-learning adoption theory” : A scientometric study during 2000-2019, based on Web of Science and SCOPUS

References

• Edumadze, J.K.E. (2019), E-Learning At The University Of Cape Coast, Ghana-Are Our Distance Education Students Technologically Ready? The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(2), 70-81, Retrieved from www.tojdel.net
   Google Scholar
• Tan, P. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan. 1-12. Retrieved from http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/3/4/2158244013503837
   Google Scholar
• Munezero, M. (2016). Challenges and Solutions to Providing Online Courses in Kenya: a lecturer’s perspective at a Kenyan university. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 4(1), 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.tojdel.net
   Google Scholar
• Tarhini, A. et al (2014), The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model, Computers in Human Behavior 41,153–163, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiyeoba, O.O. and Iloanya J.(2019). E-learning in tertiary institutions in Botswana: apathy to adoption. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(2), 157-168. doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarhini, A. H. (2015). A Cross –cultural examination of the impact of social, organizational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739-755. doi:10.111/bjet.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarhini et al (2017), Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business 10(2), 164-182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chametzky, & Barry. (2016). Contradictions in E-Learning: the naturalness of unnaturally learning online. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e –Learning, 4(1), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshman and Schubert (2015), Transfering knowledge or teaching obedience: do obedient students learn better, European Scientific Journal, 11(4), 280-293
   Google Scholar
• Zetian, F., Jun, Y., Daoliang, L., Xiaoshuan, & Lingxian. (2007). Evaluation of learner adoption intention of e-learning in china : A methodology based on perceived innovative attributes. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 609 – 615.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, L. M. (2015). Planned e –learning adoption and occupational socialization in Brazilian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1-21. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, A., Qazi, S., Puah, W., & Chin-Hong. (2018). Assessing e-learning system in higher education institutes: evidence from structural equation modelling. Interactive Technology and Smart education, 15(1), 59-78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjan, H., & Hardshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to about web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical test. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71-80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidin, S. Z. (2012). Adoption and application of mobile learning in the education industry. Procedia of 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2012), University Technology MARA, Malaysia. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H.-J. (2017). Examining civil servants’ decisions to use Web 2.0 tools for learning, based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 295-305. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1121879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Lin, Y. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). A knowledge acquisition approach to developing Mindtools for organizing and sharing differentiating knowledge in a ubiquitous learning environment. Computers & Education, 57, 1368e1377. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, R. & Jain, P. (2015). Research trends in mobile learning: a global perspective. COLLNET journal of Scientometric and Information and Information Management, 9(2), 205-224. doi:10.1080/093737766.2015.1069960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y. T., Chang, K.E. & Liu, T.C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis,. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eke, H.N. (2009), The perspectives of e-learning and libraries in Africa: challenges and opportunities, Library Review, 59(4), 274-290
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. D. (2007). Learning and Teaching in the Mobile Learning Environment of the Twenty-First Century. Austin: Texas: Austin Community College.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, A. (2008).Seven major challenges for e –learning in developing countries: Case study eBIT,Sri Lanka. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT.4 (3), .01 -18. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle. php?id=472.
   Google Scholar
• Takalani, T. (2008). Barriers to e-learning amongst postgraduate black students in higher education in South Africa. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Davis (1989) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13 (3), 319–340, doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 184-204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008) Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), doi.org/10.1111/j.15405915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor & Todd (2001). Understanding Information Technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor & Todd (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behaviour: a study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 137-155.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, Y.Y., & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned be havior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213–223. doi:10.1108/10662240410542643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar