h-type indices for multiple authorship papers based on “relative first author” principle

References

• Abbas, A.M. (2011). Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 88: 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0389-7
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S.E., & Daniel, H.D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h-index and 37 different h-index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3): 346-359. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11): 2215-2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, J.C., Hua, P.H., Rousseau, R., & Wan, J.K. (2008). Adapted pure h-index. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2): 145-157. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-9
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. (2006). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1): 8-9.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1): 131-152. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, G.-H. & Mo, X.-Q. (2019). Research on the evaluation of scientists based on weighted h-index. In: International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (pp.125-133). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99698-1_14
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, N.T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS One, 3(12): e4021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, N.T. (2009). Credit for coauthors. Science, 323(5914): 583. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.323.5914.583a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagen, N.T. (2009). Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably-not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84: 785-793. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagen, N.T. (2013). Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy. Journal of Informetrics, 7: 784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s research output. In: Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 102(46): 16569-16572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, S.E., & Greenberg, D.A. (1981). Publication credit. Science, 213(4511): 950-952. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.213.4511.950
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X. (2009). Loads of Special Authorship Functions: Linear Growth in the Percentage of “Equal First Authors” and Corresponding Authors. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(11): 2378-2381.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X.J., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2010). In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices. Journal of Information Science, 36(1): 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509348133
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Tang, W., Chen, G., Feng, C., Tu, X.M. (2016). Correlation and agreement: overview and clarification of competing concepts and measures. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 28(2): 115-120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsey (1980) Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10: 145-162. DOI: 10.1177/030631278001000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim C. (1998). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(5): 482. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980415)49:5<482::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-H
   Google Scholar
• Price, D.S. (1951). Quantitative measures of the development of science. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 14: 85-93.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D.S. (1961). Science since Babylon. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D.S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683): 510-515. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price D.S. (1981). Multiple authorship, Science, 212(4498): 987. doi: 10.1126/science.212.4498.986.b
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shreiber, M. (2008). A modification of the h-index: the hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3): 211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Shreiber, M. (2008). To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies the h for multi-authored manuscripts. New Journal of Physics, 10: 040201. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/040201
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, M. (2009). The influence of self-citation corrections and the fractionalized counting of multi-authored manuscripts on the Hirsch index. Annalen der Physik, 18(9): 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200910360
   Google Scholar
• Tabah, A.N. (1999). Literature dynamics: studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34: 249-286.
   Google Scholar
• Trueba, F.J., & Guerrero, H. (2004). A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics, 60(2): 181-204. doi: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027792.09362.3f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M.E., Rand, T.A., Resh, V.H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1): e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multi-authored publications: consequences for the impact of authors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10): 944-945. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<944::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, J.-K., Hua, P.-H., & Rousseau, R. (2007). The pure h-index: calculating an author’s h-index by taking co-authors into account. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 1(2): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2007.10700824
   Google Scholar
• Zang, Ch.T. (2009). A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO Reports, 10(5): 416-417. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar