Impact of product heterogeneity and soft budget constraint on excess capacity in Chinese energy industry based on the duopoly model

References

• Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB. 2007. Capacity choice in a mixed duopoly under price competition. Econ B. 12(26):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Basu S. 1996. Procyclical productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization. Q J Econ. 111(3):719–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu S, Fernald JG, Shapiro MD. 2001. Productivity growth in the 1990s: technology, utilization, or adjustment. Carnegie-rochester conf ser public policy. 55(1):117–165.
   Google Scholar
• Bils M, Cho JO. 1994. Cyclical factor utilization. J Monetary Econ. 33(2):319–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves RE. 1971. International corporations: the industrial economics of foreign investment. J Econ. 38(149):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin E. 1933. The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JL. 2014. Research on the soft budget constraints problem of the overseas investment of Chinese state-owned enterprises. Beijing: Economic Science Press. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Tang JJ. 2016. Managerial delegation, optimal proportion of state-owned shares and excess capacity: a study based on mixed oligopoly model. J Con Fin Econ. 2:74–84. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Chen YT, Zhang XT. 2015. Influences of internationalization and product differentiation on enterprise performance: an empirical research based on China’s listed manufacturing companies. Int Bus. 4: 134–142. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren H, Mahran HA. 2010. A tale of industrial stagnation from Africa. Int Rev Appl Econ. 24(4):495–510.
   Google Scholar
• Dewatripont M, Maskin E. 1995. Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economies. Rev Econ Stud. 62:541–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE. 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev. 67(3):297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnart JF, Licandro O, Portier F. 1999. Firm heterogeneity, capacity utilization, and the business cycle. Rev Econ Dynam. 2(2):433–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanti L. 2016. Social welfare and cross-ownership in a vertical industry: when the mode of competition matters for antitrust policy. Jpn World Econ. 37–38:8–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao JG. 2006. The effect of product differentiation on the market structure-based on evolutionary economics. Ind Econ Res. 6:30–36. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Geng Q, Jiang F, Fu T. 2011. Policy-related subsides, overcapacity and China’s economic fluctuation-empirical testing based on RBC model. J China Ind Econ. 5:27–36. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Hilke JC. 1984. Excess capacity and entry: some empirical evidence. J Ind Econ. 33:233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu RT. 2016. Analysis of supply side factors of excess capacity formation and resolution. J Modern Econ Res. 2:5–9. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Huang H, Xu C. 1999. Institutions, innovations, and growth. Am Econ Rev. 89:438–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson GH. 1998. China’s state enterprises: public good, externalities, and Coase. Am Econ Rev. 88(2):428–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang FT, Geng Q, Lv DG, Li XP. 2012. Mechanism of excess capacity based on China’s regional competition and market distortion. Chin Ind Econ. 6:44–56. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Kamien MI, Schwartz NL. 1972. Uncertain entry and excess capacity. J Am Econ Rev. 62:918–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornai J. 1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrutich MN. 2017. Capacity choice under uncertainty in a duopoly with endogenous exit. Eur J Oper Res. 258(3):1033–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YF. 2007. Wave phenomenon and the reconstruction of macroeconomic theories for developing countries. J Econ Res. 1:126–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YF, Liu MX, Zhang Q. 2004. Policy burden and enterprise’s soft budgetary building: a case study from China. Manage World. 8:81–89,127. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu RM, Shi L. 2010. The dual efficiency loss of state-owned enterprises and economic growth. J Econ Res. 1: 127–137. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Lu YZ, Poddar S. 2006. The choice of capacity in mixed duopoly under demand uncertainty. Manch Sch. 74(3):266–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis SE. 1985. The excess capacity controversy: a critique of recent criticism. Econ Inq. 23:265–275.
   Google Scholar
• Mykhayliv D, Zauner KG. 2013. Investment behavior and ownership structures in Ukraine: soft budget constraints, government ownership and private benefits of control. J Comp Econ. 41:265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y. 2014. Capacity choice in a duopoly with a consumer-friendly firm and an absolute profit-maximizing firm. Int Rev Econ Financ. 34:105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa H. 2006. Capacity choice in the mixed duopoly with product differentiation. Pac Econ Bull. 12:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Roland G. 1998. Federalism and the soft budget constraint. Am Econ Rev. 88:1143–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Xu C. 1998. Innovation and bureaucracy under soft and hard budget constraints. Rev Econ Stud. 65:151–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao FL, Hou Q. 2012. The research on the impact of product differentiation to innovation incentives – based on spillovers. Stud Sci Sci. 30:608–613. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Robles J. 2011. Demand growth and strategically useful idle capacity. J Oxford Econ Papers. 63:767–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal R. 1998. Monopoly and soft budget constraint. Rand J Econ. 29:596–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Vives X. 1984. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand J Econ. 15:546–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang DX, Jiang CH. 2010. Study on pricing mode, product differentiation and innovation incentives of enterprises. J financ econ. 36:90–99. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaru Y, Nakamura Y, Saito M. 2009. Capacity choice in a mixed duopoly with managerial delegation. Econ B. 29(3):1904–1924.
   Google Scholar
• Vives X. 1986. Commitment, flexibility, and market outcomes. Int J Ind Organ. 4(2):217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Wan F, Zhou Q. 2015. The defect and selection of product differentiation strategy – based on the analysis of hoteling model. J Techno Manag Res. 6:49–52. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Wen N, Sasaki D. 2001. Would excess capacity in public firm be socially optimal? J. Economic Record. 77:283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood J. 2013. The effects of bailouts and soft budget constraints on the environment. Environ Resour Econ. 54:127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie ZS, Li SJ. 2015. The causes and properties of soft budget constraint: an improved generalized. China Econ Quar. 14:1193–1210. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Yu DH, Lu YN. 2015. Government improper intervention and overcapacity of strategic emerging industries–a case study of Chinese photovoltaic industry. J China Ind Econ. 10:53–68. Chinese.
   Google Scholar