Tree species biomass and carbon stock measurement using ground based-LiDAR

References

• Aguirre O, Hui G, Gadow K, Jiménez J. 2003. An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables. For Ecol Manage. 183:137–145. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00102-6.10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00102-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba M, Scaioni M. 2007. Comparison of techniques for terrestrial laser scanning data georeferencing applied to 3-D modelling of cultural heritage. Int Arch Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 36:1–8. Available from: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/5-W47/pdf/alba_scaioni.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aschoff T, Thies M, Spiecker H. 2004. Describing forest stands using terrestrial laser-scanning. Int Arch Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 35:237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Barber D, Mills J, Bryan PG. 2001. Laser scanning and photogrammetry: 21st century metrology. Proceedings of 18th International Symposium CIPA 2001; Sep 18–21, Potsdam; p. 360–366.
   Google Scholar
• Bienert A, Maas H, Scheller S. 2006. Analysis of the information content of terrestrial laser scanner point cloud for the automatic determination of forest inventory parameters. ISPRS WG VIII/11 & EARSeL joint Conference ‘3D Remote Sensing in Forestry’; Feb 14–15; Vienna;15.
   Google Scholar
• Boehler W, Vicent MB, Marbs A. 2003. Investigating laser scanner accuracy. Int Arch Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 34:696–701.
   Google Scholar
• Bombelli A, Henry M, Castaldi S, Adu-Bredu S, Arneth A, Grandcourt AD, Grieco E, Kutsch WL, Lehsten V, Rasile A, et al. 2009. An outlook on the Sub-Saharan Africa carbon balance. Biogeosciences. 6:2193–2205.10.5194/bg-6-2193-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack C. 2009. Standard point on tree bole for measurement. Forest measurement and modelling. Computer-based course resources for Forest Measurement and Modeling (FSTY2009) at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Brown S, Gillespie AJ, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci. 35:881–902.
   Google Scholar
• de Gier A. 2003. A new approach to woody biomass assessment in woodlands and shrublands. In: Roy P, editor. Geoinformatics for tropical ecosystem. Dehradun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh; p. 161–198. ISBN: 81-211-0370-3.
   Google Scholar
• Drake JB, Dubayah RO, Knox RG, Clark DB, Blair JB. 2002. Sensitivity of large-footprint lidar to canopy structure and biomass in a neotropical rainforest. Remote Sens. Environ. 81:378–392. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00013-5.10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Chen A, Peng C, Zhao S, Ci L. 2001. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science. 292:2320–2322.10.1126/science.1058629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1998. Geospatial positioning accuracy standards, part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy. PDF FGDC-STD-007.3-1998. Washington (DC): Federal Geographic Data Committee, Subcommittee for Base Cartographic Data; p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• [FSI] Forest Survey of India. 1996. Volume equations for forest of India, Nepal and Bhutan. Dehradun: Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA. 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett. 2:045023. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023.10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwalt CR, Schultz M. 1968. Principles and error theory and cartographic applications (No. ACIC-TR-96). St. Louis (MO): Aeronautical Chart and Information Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Leckie D, Gougeon F, Yu X, Maltamo M. 2008. Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. Int J Remote Sens. 29:1339–1366. doi:10.1080/01431160701736489.10.1080/01431160701736489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC [Inter governmental Panel on Climate Change]. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaasalainen S, Hyyppä J, Karjalainen M, Krooks A, Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa P, Holopainen M, Jaakkola A. 2010. Comparison of terrestrial laser scanner and synthetic aperture radar data in the study of forest defoliation. Int Arch Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 38:82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kale MP, Ravan SA, Roy PS, Singh S. 2009. Patterns of carbon sequestration in forests of western ghats and study of applicability of remote sensing in generating carbon credits through afforestation/reforestation. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 37:457–471.10.1007/s12524-009-0035-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketterings QM, Coe R, Noordwijk MV, Ambagau Y, Palm CA. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For Ecol Manage. 146:199–209. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00460-6.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00460-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch B, Heyder U, Weinacker H. 2006. Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar data. Photogram Eng Remote Sens. 72:357–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krankina ON, Harmon ME, Cohen WB, Oetter DR, Olga Z, Duane MV. 2004. Carbon stores, sinks, and sources in forests of northwestern Russia: can we reconcile forest inventories with remote sensing results? Clim Change. 67:257–272. doi:10.1007/s10584-004-3154-6.10.1007/s10584-004-3154-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Marcot BG, Saxena A. 2006. Tree species diversity and distribution patterns in tropical forests of Garo Hills. Curr Sci. 91:1370–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Slatton KC, Roth BE, Cropper WP. 2009. Prediction of forest canopy light interception using three‐dimensional airborne LiDAR data. Int J Remote Sens. 30:189–207.10.1080/01431160802261171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience. 52:19–30.10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, et al. 2012. Automatic stem mapping using single-scan terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 50:661–670.10.1109/TGRS.2011.2161613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichti DD, Gordon SJ, Stewart MP. 2002. Ground-based laser scanners: operation, systems and applications. Geomatica. 56:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lichti DD, Gordon SJ, Tipdecho T. 2005. Error models and propagation in directly georeferenced terrestrial laser scanner networks. J Surv Eng. 131:135–142.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2005)131:4(135)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, et al. 2003. LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Prog Phys Geogr. 27:88–106.10.1191/0309133303pp360ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas HG, Bienert A, Scheller S, Keane E. 2008. Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data. Int J Remote Sens. 29:1579–1593.10.1080/01431160701736406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo J, Manduchi R, Matthies L. 2001. Ladar-based discrimination of grass from obstacles for autonomous navigation. In: Rus D, Singh S, editors. Experimental robotics VII, Lecture notes in control and information sciences volume, vol. 271; Berlin: Springer; p. 111–120. doi:10.1007/3-540-45118-8_12.
   Google Scholar
• Miri M, Varshosaz M. 2011. Evaluating parameters affecting the georeferencing accuracy of terrestrial laser scanners. Int Arch Photogram Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 38:387–390. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W16-387-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen MJ, et al. 2010. New automated point-cloud alignment for ground-based light detection and ranging data of long coastal sections. J Surv Eng. 137:14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu SC, Wynne RH, Scrivani JA. 2004. Fusion of small-footprint lidar and multispectral data to estimate plot-level volume and biomass in deciduous and pine forests in Virginia, USA. For Sci. 50:551–565.
   Google Scholar
• Raumonen P, Kaasalainen S, Kaasalainen M, Kaartinen H. 2011. Approximation of volume and branch size distribution of trees from laser scanner data. Int Arch Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 38:79–84. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W12-79-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindranath NH, Somashekhar BS, Gadgil M. 1997. Carbon flow in Indian forests. Clim Change. 35:297–320.10.1023/A:1005303405404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repola J. 2009. Biomass equations for Scot pine and Norway spruce in Finland. Silva Fennica. 43:625–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J, Birdsey R, Cieszewski C. 1997. Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. For Sci. 43:424–434.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra CA, Valle JID, Orrego SA, Moreno FH, Harmon ME, Zapata M, Colorado GJ, Herrera MA, Lara W, Restrepo DE, et al. 2007. Total carbon stocks in a tropical forest landscape of the Porce region, Colombia. For Ecol Manage. 243:299–309. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonse M, Aschoff T, Spiecker H, Thies M. 2003. Automatic determination of forest inventory parameters using terrestrial laserscanning. Proceedings of the Scand Laser Scientific Workshop on Airborne Laser Scanning of Forests; Umeå; p. 252–258.
   Google Scholar
• Singh K, Chand P. 2012. Above-ground tree outside forest (TOF) phytomass and carbon estimation in the semi-arid region of southern Haryana: a synthesis approach of remote sensing and field data. J Earth Syst Sci. 121:1469–1482.10.1007/s12040-012-0237-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somogyi Z, Teobaldelli M, Federici S, Matteucci G, Pagliari V, Grassi G, Seufert G. 2008. Allometric biomass and carbon factors database. iForest-Biogeosciences For. 1:107–113. doi:10.3832/ifor0463-0010107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JH, Han SH, Yun KY, Kim YI. 2002. Assessing the possibility of land-cover classification using lidar intensity data. Photogrammetric Computer Vision Symposium 2002, ISPRS Commission III; 2002 Sep 9–13; Graz; p. 259–263.
   Google Scholar
• Song C, Dickinson MB, Su L, Zhang S. 2010. Estimating average tree crown size using spatial information from Ikonos and QuickBird images: across-sensor and across-site comparisons. Remote Sens Environ. 114:1099–1107.10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soudarissanane S, Lindenbergh R, Menenti M, Teunissen P. 2011. Scanning geometry: influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens. 66:389–399.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez JC, Ontiveros C, Smith S, Snape S. 2005. Use of airborne LiDAR and aerial photography in the estimation of individual tree heights in forestry. Comput Geosci. 31:253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS, Lindgren PM. 2001. Stand structure and small mammals in young lodgepole pine forest: 10-year results after thinning. Ecol Appl. 11:1151–1173.10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1151:SSASMI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson JS, Jeglum JK. 2001. Structure and dynamics of an undisturbed old-growth Norway spruce forest on the rising Bothnian coastline. For Ecol Manage. 151:67–79.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00697-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temesgen H, Gadow KV. 2004. Generalized height – diameter models – an application for major tree species in complex stands of interior British Columbia. Eur J For Res. 123:45–51.10.1007/s10342-004-0020-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas V, Treitz P, McCaughey JH, Morrison I. 2006. Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density. Can J For Res. 36:34–47.10.1139/x05-230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari AK, Singh JS. 1984. Mapping forest biomass in India through aerial photographs and nondestructive field sampling. Appl Geogr. 4:151–165.10.1016/0143-6228(84)90019-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaaja M, Hyyppä J, Kukko A, Kaartinen H, Hyyppä H, Alho P. 2011. Mapping topography changes and elevation accuracies using a mobile laser scanner. Remote Sens. 3:587–600.10.3390/rs3030587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Hann DW. 1988. Height-diameter equations for sixteen tree species in the central Western Willamette Valley of Oregon. Research Paper No. 51. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf PR, Ghilani CD. 1997. Adjustment computations: statistics and least squares in surveying and GIS. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Zeide B, Vanderschaaf C. 2001. The effect of density on the height–diameter relationship. In: Outcalt KW, editor. Proceedings of the Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference; March 20–22; Knoxville, TN: USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-48; p. 453–456.
   Google Scholar
• Zenner EK. 2000. Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests? Ecol Appl. 10:800–810.10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0800:DRTISC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar