Study of coastal wetland classification based on decision rules using ALOS AVNIR-2 images and ancillary geospatial data

References

• Brown de Colstoun EC, Story MH, Thompson C, Commisso K, Smith TG, Irons JR. 2003. National Park vegetation mapping using multitemporal Landsat 7 data and a decision tree classifier. Remote Sens Environ. 85:316–327.10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00010-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough JS, Park RA, Fuller R. 2010. The nature conservancy: SLAMM 6 beta Technical Documentation, Release 6.0.1 beta.
   Google Scholar
• Coppin PR, Bauer ME. 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens Rev. 13:207–234.10.1080/02757259609532305
   Google Scholar
• Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States: Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Cowardin LM, Golet FC. 1995. US Fish and Wildlife Service 1979 wetland classification: a review. Vegetatio. 118:139–152.10.1007/BF00045196
   Google Scholar
• Dahl TE. 2006. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. Washington, DC: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly JP, Bertness MD. 2001. Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cordgrass in response to accelerated sea-level rise. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 98:14218–14223.10.1073/pnas.251209298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl MA, Brodley CE. 1997. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 61:399–409.10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00049-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore MS, Wilson EH, Barrett N, Civco DL, Prisloe S, Hurd JD, Chadwick C. 2008. Integrating multi-temporal spectral and structural information to map wetland vegetation in a lower Connecticut River tidal marsh. Remote Sens Environ. 112:4048–4060.10.1016/j.rse.2008.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz S, Varlyguin D, Smith A, Wright R, Prince S, Mazzacato M, Tringe J, Jantz C, Melchoir B. 2004. Application of multitemporal Landsat data to map and monitor land cover and land use change in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing image. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers; p. 223–232.10.1142/9789812702630_0025
   Google Scholar
• Gong P, Niu Z, Cheng X, Zhao K, Zhou D, Guo J, Liang L, Wang X, Li D, Huang H, et al. 2010. China’s wetland change (1990–2000) determined by remote sensing. Sci Chin Earth Sci. 53:1036–1042.10.1007/s11430-010-4002-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanes DM, Ward K, Erikson LH. 2011. Waves and tides responsible for the intermittent closure of the entrance of a small, sheltered tidal wetland at San Francisco, CA. Cont Shelf Res. 31:1682–1687.10.1016/j.csr.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope A, Boynton W, Stow D, Douglas D. 2003. Interannual growth dynamics of vegetation in the Kuparuk River watershed, Alaska based on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Int J Remote Sens. 24:3413–3425.10.1080/0143116021000021170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui F, Xu B, Huang H, Yu Q, Gong P. 2008. Modelling spatial-temporal change of Poyang Lake using multitemporal Landsat imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 29:5767–5784.10.1080/01431160802060912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JR. 2004. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jia K, Wei X, Gu X, Yao Y, Xie X, Li B. 2014. Land cover classification using Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager data in Beijing, China. Geocarto Int. 29:941–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemas V. 2011. Remote sensing of wetlands: case studies comparing practical techniques. J Coastal Res. 27:418–427.10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00174.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemas V. 2013. Remote sensing of emergent and submerged wetlands: an overview. Int J Remote Sens. 34:6286–6320.10.1080/01431161.2013.800656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao M, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Gao W. 2011. Sea level affecting marshes model and remotely sensed and geo-spatial datasets for a large area. Annals of GIS. 17:99–104.10.1080/19475683.2011.576270
   Google Scholar
• Mayer AL, Lopez RD. 2011. Use of remote sensing to support forest and wetlands policies in the USA. Remote Sens. 3:1211–1233.10.3390/rs3061211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JT, Sundareshwar P, Nietch CT, Kjerfve B, Cahoon D. 2002. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology. 83:2869–2877.10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2869:ROCWTR]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray N, Phinn S, Clemens R, Roelfsema C, Fuller R. 2012. Continental scale mapping of tidal flats across East Asia using the Landsat Archive. Remote Sens. 4:3417–3426.10.3390/rs4113417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls RJ, Hoozemans FM, Marchand M. 1999. Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: regional and global analyses. Global Environ Change. 9:S69–S87.10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odum EP. 1993. Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ozesmi S, Bauer M. 2002. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 2002 Oct 1;10:381–402.10.1023/A:1020908432489
   Google Scholar
• Pal M, Mather PM. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ. 86:554–565.10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00132-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safavian SR, Landgrebe D. 1991. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 21:660–674.10.1109/21.97458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruce JP, Smoot JC, Ellis JT, Hilbert K, Swann R. 2014. Geospatial method for computing supplemental multi-decadal US coastal land use and land cover classification products, using Landsat data and C-CAP products. Geocarto Int. 29:470–485.10.1080/10106049.2013.798357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiner RW. 1996. Wetlands. In: Philipson W, editor. Manual of photographic interpretation. 2nd ed. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing; 2440 p.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss SM, Kulikowski CA. 1991. Computer systems that learn: classification and prediction methods from statistics, neural nets, machine learning, and expert systems. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wulder M, Franklin SE. 2003. Remote sensing of forest environments: concepts and case studies. Amsterdam: Kluwer Press.10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4
   Google Scholar
• Xu C, Sheng S, Zhou W, Cui L, Liu M. 2011. Characterizing wetland change at landscape scale in Jiangsu Province, China. Environ Monit Assess. Aug;179:279–292.10.1007/s10661-010-1735-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Homer C, Brock J, Fry J. 2013. An efficient method for change detection of soil, vegetation and water in the Northern Gulf of Mexico wetland ecosystem. Int J Remote Sens. 34:6321–6336.10.1080/01431161.2013.800653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Zhang R, Li X. 2009. Classification of wetland from TM imageries based on decision tree. WSEAS Trans Inf Sci Appl. 6:1155–1164.
   Google Scholar