Object-oriented semantic labelling of spectral–spatial LiDAR point cloud for urban land cover classification and buildings detection

References

• Arya S, Mount DM, Netanyahu NS, Silverman R, Wu AY. 1998. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions. J ACM. 45:891–923.10.1145/293347.293348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson P. 2000. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens. XXXIII:110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Benediktsson JA, Chanussot J, Fauvel M. 2007. Multiple classifier systems in remote sensing: from basics to recent developments. In: Haindl M, Kittler J, Roli F, editor. Multiple classifier systems. Heidelberg: Springer. p. 501–512.
   Google Scholar
• Burtch R. 2002. Lidar principles and applications. In: IMAGIN conference; Traverse City, MI. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Lin C-J. 2011. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2: 27:1–27: 27. Software available from: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.10.1145/1961189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Zhang L, Li J, Liu R. 2012. Urban building roof segmentation from airborne lidar point clouds. Int J Remote Sens. 33:6497–6515.10.1080/01431161.2012.690083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damodaran BB, Nidamanuri RR. 2014. Dynamic linear classifier system for hyperspectral image classification for land cover mapping. IEEE J Sel Top Appl. 7:2080–2093.10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2294857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir N, Baltsavias E. 2012. Automated modeling of 3d building roofs using image and lidar data. Proceedings of the XXII Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing; Melbourne, Australia. Vol. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Du P, Xia J, Zhang W, Tan K, Liu Y, Liu S. 2012. Multiple classifier system for remote sensing image classification: a review. Sensors. 12:4764–4792.10.3390/s120404764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauvel M, Chanussot J, Benediktsson JA. 2006. Decision fusion for the classification of urban remote sensing images. IEEE T Geosci Remote. 44:2828–2838.10.1109/TGRS.2006.876708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filin S, Pfeifer N. 2006. Segmentation of airborne laser scanning data using slope adaptive neighbourhood. ISPRS Photogramm Remote Sens. 60:71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Lohani B. 2011. Heuristical feature extraction from LiDAR data and their visualization. Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning, International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Calgary: University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Golovinskiy A, Kim VG, Funkhouser T. 2009. Shape-based recognition of 3D point clouds in urban environments. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision; Kyoto, Japan. p. 2154–2161.10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459471
   Google Scholar
• Hoffhine Wilson E, Hurd JD, Civco DL, Prisloe MP, Arnold C. 2003. Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sens Environ. 86:275–285.10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00074-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Gatrell JD, Mclean DD, editors. 2005. Geo-spatial technologies in urban environment. In: Applying geospatial technologies in urban environment. New York (NY): Springer; p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lari Z, Habib A, Kwak E. 2011. An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences; Calgary, Canada. Vol. XXXVII-5/W12.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Dong H, Lee KM, Lee SUK. 2008. Fusion of lidar and imagery for reliable building extraction. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 74:215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis DD. 1998. Naive (Bayes) at forty: the independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Nédellec C, Rouveirol C, editors. Machine learning: ECML-98. Chemnitz: Springer; p. 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X. 2008. Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. Prog Phys Geogr. 32:31–49. Available from http://ppg.sagepub.com/content/32/1/31.abstract.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma R. 2005. DEM generation and building detection from lidar data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 71:847–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan BB, Wang C, Tanahashi H, Hirayu H, Niwa Y, Yamamoto K, Tachibana K, Sasagawa T. 2006. A computer vision based approach for 3D building modelling of airborne laser scanner DSM data. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 30:54–77.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinuzzi S, Gould WA, Ramos González OM. 2007. Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data. Landsc Urban Plan. 79:288–297.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matikainen L, Kaartinen H, Hyyppa J. 2007. Classification tree based building detection from laser scanner and aerial image data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 36: 280–287.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer H. 1999. Automatic object extraction from aerial imagery – a survey focusing on buildings. Comput Vis Image Und. 74: 138–149.10.1006/cviu.1999.0750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means JE, Acker SA, Fitt BJ, Renslow M, Emerson L, Hendrix CJ. 2000. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 66:1367–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Currit N, Zhao K. 2010. Ground filtering algorithms for airborne LiDAR data: a review of critical issues. Remote Sens. 2: 833–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa A. 2012. A new object based method for automated extraction of urban objects from airborne sensors data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 39:309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Paparoditis N, Cord M, Jordan M, Cocquerez J-P. 1998. Building detection and reconstruction from mid- and high-resolution aerial imagery. Comput Vis Image Und. 72:122–142.10.1006/cviu.1998.0722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmehr EG, Fraser CS, Zhang C, Leach J. 2013. Automatic registration of optical imagery with 3d lidar data using local combined mutual information. In: ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. Nov; II-5/W2 229–234.10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W2-229-2013
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer N. 2005. A subdivision algorithm for smooth 3D terrain models. ISPRS J Photogramm. 59:115–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbani TF, Heuvel VD, Vosselmann G. 2006. Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraints. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 36:248–253.
   Google Scholar
• Rottensteiner F. 2003. Automatic generation of high-quality building models from lidar data. IEEE Comput Graph. 23:42–50.10.1109/MCG.2003.1242381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusu RB, Cousins S. 2011. 3D is here: point cloud library (PCL). Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on May; Shanghai, China. p. 1–4.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980567
   Google Scholar
• Rutzinger M, Rottensteiner F, Pfeifer N. 2009. A comparison of evaluation techniques for building extraction from airborne laser scanning. IEEE J Sel Top Appl. 2:11–20.10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2012488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salolahti M. 2010. Advanced use of lidar data – automatic building vectorization and contour production. Fig Congress 2010, Facing the Challenges – Building the capacity; 2010 April; Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sampath A, Shan J. 2010. Segmentation and reconstruction of polyhedral building roofs from aerial lidar point clouds. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 48:1554–1567.10.1109/TGRS.2009.2030180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra J. 1986. Introduction to mathematical morphology. Comput Vis Gr Image Process. 35:283–305.10.1016/0734-189X(86)90002-2
   Google Scholar
• Shan J, Sampath A. 2008. Building extraction from LiDAR point clouds based on clustering techniques, Chapter 15. In: Shan J, Toth C, editors. Topographic laser ranging and scanning: principles and processing. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 423–446.
   Google Scholar
• Sithole G. 2005. Segmentation and classification of airborne laser scanner data. Geodesy. 59:93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn G, Dowman I. 2007. Data fusion of high-resolution satellite imagery and LiDAR data for automatic building extraction. ISPRS J Photogramm. 62:43–63.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Salvaggio C. 2013. Aerial 3D building detection and modeling from airborne LiDAR point clouds. IEEE J Sel Top Appl. Earth Obs Remote Sens. 6:1440–1449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2014. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). New York (NY): United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0
   Google Scholar
• Vosselman P. 2000. Slope based filtering of laser altimetric data. International Archieves of programmetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan Q, Xiao Y, Liang Y. 2009. Color-based segmentation of point clouds. In: Bretar F, Pierrot-Deseilligny M, Vosselman G, editors. Laser scanning 2009, IAPRS. Paris: Part 3/W8; p. 248–252, Vol. XXXVIII. September XXXVIII.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Lin X, Ning X. 2013. SVM-based classification of segmented airborne LiDAR point clouds in urban areas. Remote Sens. 5:3749–3775.10.3390/rs5083749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Song C, Simmers J, Cheng P. 2004. Urban 3D GIS from LiDAR and digital aerial images. Comput Geosci. 30:345–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitová B, Flusser J. 2003. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vision Comput. 21:977–1000.10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar