Change detection of linear features in temporally spaced remotely sensed images using edge-based grid analysis

References

• Anderson JR. 1977. Land use and land cover changes – a framework for monitoring. J Res US Geol Surv. 5:143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aplin P. 2004. Remote sensing: land cover. Prog Phys Geogr. 28:283–293.10.1191/0309133304pp413pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asner GP, Keller M, Pereira R, Zweede JC. 2002. Remote sensing of selective logging in Amazonia – assessing limitations based on detailed field observations, landsat ETM+, and textural analysis. Remote Sens Environ. 80:483–496.10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00326-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canny J. 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 8:679–698.10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlotto MJ. 1997. Detection and analysis of change in remotely sensed imagery with application to wide area surveillance. IEEE Trans Image Proc. 6:189–202.10.1109/83.552106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilla G, Hay GJ, Ruiz JR. 2008. Size-constrained region merging (SCRM): an automated delineation tool for assisted photo interpretation. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sens. 74:409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Hay GJ. 2011. An airborne lidar sampling strategy to model forest canopy height from Quickbird imagery and GEOBIA. Remote Sens Environ. 115:1532–1542.10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Hay GJ, Carvalho LMT, Wulder MA. 2012. Object-based change detection. Int J Remote Sens. 33:4434–4457.10.1080/01431161.2011.648285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Mao Z, Philpot B, Li J, Pan D. 2013. Detecting changes in high-resolution satellite coastal imagery using an image object detection approach. Int J Remote Sens. 34:2454–2469. doi:10.1080/01431161.2012.743691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton C. 2003. Change detection in overhead imagery using neural networks. Appl Intell. 18:215–234.10.1023/A:1021942526896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Lambin E. 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens. 25:1565–1596.10.1080/0143116031000101675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey V, Zhang Y, Zhong M. 2010. A review on image segmentation techniques with remote sensing perspective. ISPRS TC VII Symposium XXXVIII (7A), Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Erener A, Düzgün HS. 2009. A methodology for land use change detection of high resolution pan images based on texture analysis. Ital J Remote Sens. 41:47–59.10.5721/ItJRS20094124
   Google Scholar
• Falkowski MJ, Wulder MA, Whiteand JC, Gillis MD. 2009. Supporting large-area, sample-based forest inventories with very high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Prog Phys Geogr. 33:403–423.10.1177/0309133309342643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher PF, Comber AJ, Wadsworth RA. 2005. Land use and land cover: contradiction or complement. In: Fisher P, Unwin D, editors. Re-presenting GIS85-98. Chichester: Wiley; p. 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Fu KS, Mui JK. 1981. A survey on image segmentation. Pattern Recognit. 13:3–16.10.1016/0031-3203(81)90028-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. 2007. Digital image processing. 2nd ed. Pearson Education. ISBN: 81-7758-168-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hall O, Hay GJ. 2003. A multiscale object-specific approach to digital change detection. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 4:311–327.10.1016/S0303-2434(03)00010-2
   Google Scholar
• Hay GJ, Castilla G. 2008. Object-based image analysis—spatial concepts for knowledge-driven remote sensing applications. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ, editors. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hay GJ, Castilla G, Wulder MA, Ruiz JR. 2005. An automated object-based approach for the multiscale image segmentation of forest scenes. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 7:339–359.10.1016/j.jag.2005.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay GJ, Hemachandranand B, Kyle CD. 2010. Heat (home energy assessment technologies): residential waste heat monitoring, google maps and airborne thermal imagery. GIM Int. 24:13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Heath M, Sarkar S, Sanocki T, Bowyer KW. 1997. A robust visual method for assessing the relative performance of edge-detection algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 19:1338–1359.10.1109/34.643893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath M, Sarkar S, Sanocki T, Bowyer KW. 1998. Comparison of edge detectors: a methodology and initial study. Comput Vision Image Understand. 69:38–54.10.1006/cviu.1997.0587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold M, Scepan J, Clarke KC. 2002. The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environ Planning A. 34:1443–1458.10.1068/a3496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilsever M, Unsalan C. 2012. Two-dimensional change detection methods: remote sensing applications, X (72): 42; London: Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978-1-4471-4254-6.
   Google Scholar
• Juneja M, Sandhu PS. 2009. Performance evaluation of edge detection techniques for images in spatial domain. Int J Comput Theory Eng. 1:1793–8201.
   Google Scholar
• Lu D, Mausel P, Brondízio E, Moran E. 2004. Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens. 25:2365–2401.10.1080/0143116031000139863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendra PM, Fitch RC. 1981. Real-time adaptive contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 3:655–661.10.1109/TPAMI.1981.4767166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson RF. 1983. Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sens. 49:1303–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfanidis SJ. 1996. Introductionto signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pal NR, Pal SK. 1993. A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognit. 26:1274–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijanowski BC, Brown DG, Shellito BA, Manik GA. 2002. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a land transformation model. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 26:553–575.10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1
   Google Scholar
• Rowe NC, Grewe LL. 2001. Change detection for linear features in aerial photographs using edge-finding. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 39:1608–1612.10.1109/36.934092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Boyer KL. 1996. Quantitative measure of change based on feature organization: eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Proceedings of the 1996 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 478–483.
   Google Scholar
• Seerha GK, Kaur R. 2013. Review on recent image segmentation techniques. Int J Comput Sci Eng. 5:0975–3397.
   Google Scholar
• Shrivakshan GT, Chandrasekar C. 2012. A comparison of various edge detection techniques used in image processing. Int J Comput Sci Issues. 9:1694–0814.
   Google Scholar
• Singh A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens. 10:898–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofina N, Ehlers M. 2012. Object-based change detection using high-resolution remotely sensed data and GIS. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX-B7, XXII ISPRS Congress; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer H, Franck R, Kollewe M, Rega N, Rothkirch A, Wiemker R. 2001. Change detection with 1 m resolution satellite and aerial images. Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 5:2256–2258.
   Google Scholar
• Stoica P, Moses R. 2005. Spectral analysis of signals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-113956-8.
   Google Scholar
• Subudhi BN, Bovolo F, Ghosh A, Bruzzone L. 2014. Spatio-contextual fuzzy clustering with Markov random field model for change detection in remotely sensed images. Opt Laser Technol. 57:284–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Huang X, Muramatsu K, Zhang L. 2010. Object-oriented change detection for high-resolution imagery using a genetic algorithm. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information ScienceXXXVIII (8); Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Wulder MA, Hall RJ, Coops NC, Franklin SE. 2004. High spatial resolution remotely sensed data for ecosystem characterization. BioScience. 54:511–521.10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0511:HSRRSD]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulder MA, White JC, Hay GJ, Castilla G. 2008. Towards automated segmentation of forest inventory polygons on high spatial resolution satellite imagery. For Chronicle. 84:221–230.10.5558/tfc84221-2
   Google Scholar
• Xiuwan C. 2002. Using remote sensing and GIS to analyse land cover change and its impacts on regional sustainable development. Int J Remote Sens. 23:107–124.10.1080/01431160010007051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YJ. 1997. Evaluation and comparison of different segmentation algorithms. Pattern Recognit Lett. 18:963–974.10.1016/S0167-8655(97)00083-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar